Skip to content

Project Meeting 2024.09.10

rcopperman edited this page Sep 10, 2024 · 1 revision

Agenda

  • Admin
    • By-laws for project management committee
    • Consortium dues
    • Phase 10A task ideas
    • Western Australia/Perth update
    • Thursday Meeting agenda
  • Administrative Transition
    • MPO/AMPO Meeting (Mark Moran)
    • Multiple Fund idea (Alex B)
    • Update on other options
  • Phase 10A task ideas
  • Technical Updates
    • Phase 9a updates

Meeting Notes

General Admin

  • By-laws for project management committee
    • Available on Google Drive
    • Only need a Google account to edit, but not to view it
  • Consortium dues
    • Consortium contributions should be finalized by end of September
    • Ellen from AMPO should know status of each agencies contribution
    • Executed agreements should be on ActivitySim drive, so can check on sunset date of those contracts to ensure agency contract is in place
  • Western Australia/Perth update
    • Not rejoining consortium
    • Agency felt they were not as an advanced user as other member agencies and so wanted to go with a more simplified and easier to use platform
    • Proceeding with Bentley's Agent
  • Thursday Meeting agenda
    • Agenda: Estimation mode improvements
    • Minimum consortium attendees requested: Joe, Alex, and SANDAG

Administrative Transition

  • MPO/AMPO Meeting (Mark Moran)
    • MPO modelers and executive directors are meeting with Bill Keyrouze from AMPO this afternoon (9/10/24), organized by SEMCOG MPO, to discuss options of continuing with AMPO
    • Purpose of meeting is to go to AMPO as a united front
    • Will discuss what percentage they would consider to have AMPO reconsider
    • (Joe C) Important for Consortium for AMPO to be willing to document and track the work they have completed under the contract with the funds; Consortium should not stay with AMPO unless that is met
    • Not determined at moment is what timeline to set to finalize AMPO decision
  • Multiple Fund idea (Alex B)
    • There is a real possibility that Texas will put a lot of money into ABMs (larger than $35K)
      • Question to consider is how Consortium can benefit
      • (Joe C) Concerned that w/o one pooled fund there will be too many forks/versions of ActivitySim
  • Update on other options
    • RAND is not an option
    • Should reach out to NARC only after AMPO is determined to be absolutely not an option

Phase 10A Preparation

  • Phase 10A task ideas
    • Minimum: PM Task, General software development support; other low hanging fruit such as documentation and useability fixes/updates
    • Other suggestions:
      • Performance enhancements
        • Current state: Unknown ambiguities about why performance varies from one platform to another
        • Proposed task: Investigate hardware and software configurations further to figure out other potential improvements
    • PopulationSim updates
    • Additional estimation tasks (add on to 9b work)
  • Not Doing: investing in simpler model that is focused on easier usability
    • Current consortium view: Not something to take on with existing funds but supportive of others doing it
    • Potential solution to collaborate with TTI or other University (ex: Greg McFarlane), while they lead simplified solution

Technical Updates

  • Phase 9a updates
    • WSP contract signed by WSP, awaiting signature from AMPO
    • Due to contract delays, Phase 9b work may need to extend into CY25
Clone this wiki locally