Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split chat responses and legacy responses on /search screen #330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

mathewjordan
Copy link
Member

@mathewjordan mathewjordan commented May 17, 2024

This work creates tabbing on the Search screen allowing a user to toggle between the streamed AI response and the legacy search results.

image

image

A few things:

  • Tabbing is controlled at the search context level to better maintain control over the active view.
  • Updating search input should always reset the tab to the stream view if AI response is toggled on
  • Updating facets on the results screen will should not reset the tab
  • An actions bar will render below the streamed response upon completion, giving the user avenues to view the results or ask another question

@mathewjordan mathewjordan changed the base branch from deploy/staging to preview/chat-integration May 17, 2024 18:29
@mathewjordan mathewjordan changed the title 4740 new chat request flow Split chat responses and legacy responses on /search screen Jun 13, 2024
@mathewjordan mathewjordan force-pushed the 4740-new-chat-request-flow branch 4 times, most recently from 5beab9c to 6df45e4 Compare June 13, 2024 17:23
Copy link
Contributor

@adamjarling adamjarling left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works great! Looks awesome... let's get this in. 👍

@mathewjordan mathewjordan merged commit 0230848 into preview/chat-integration Jun 14, 2024
1 check passed
@mathewjordan mathewjordan deleted the 4740-new-chat-request-flow branch June 14, 2024 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants