Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add address normalization #184

Closed
wants to merge 12 commits into from
Closed

feat: add address normalization #184

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

bollu
Copy link
Collaborator

@bollu bollu commented Sep 23, 2024

This PR starts implementing address normalization in order to normalize bitvector expressions.
We aim for these to be upstreamed into the Lean bitvector proof development.

Testing:

make all succeeds, nothing was change with regards to conformance.

License:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is
made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

shigoel added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2024
### Description:

We noticed that `simp_mem` required way too many heartbeats, so we
change it to be less agressive.
In future, based off of work in
#184, we shall introduce a
different tactic call `mem_omega` to close `omega` style goals, and
making `simp_mem` (i.e., the internal rewriter within the symbolic
simulation) to only perform rewriting, not goal-closing.

### Testing:

What tests have been run? Did `make all` succeed for your changes? Was
conformance testing successful on an Aarch64 machine?

Conformance succeeds.

### License:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is
made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Co-authored-by: Shilpi Goel <[email protected]>
@shigoel
Copy link
Collaborator

shigoel commented Sep 30, 2024

Closing at @bollu 's request.

@shigoel shigoel closed this Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants