A complete web framework for Ruby
- Home page: http://lotusrb.org
- Mailing List: http://lotusrb.org/mailing-list
- API Doc: http://rdoc.info/gems/lotusrb
- Bugs/Issues: https://github.com/lotus/lotus/issues
- Support: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/lotus-ruby
- Chat: https://gitter.im/lotus/chat
Lotus supports Ruby (MRI) 2+
Add this line to your application's Gemfile:
gem 'lotusrb'
And then execute:
$ bundle
Or install it yourself as:
$ gem install lotusrb
Lotus combines the power and the flexibility of all its frameworks. It uses Lotus::Router and Lotus::Controller for routing and controller layer, respectively. While Lotus::View it's used for the presentational logic.
If you're not familiar with those libraries, please read their READMEs first.
Unlike other Ruby web frameworks, Lotus has flexible conventions for the code structure. Developers can arrange the layout of their projects as they prefer. There is a suggested architecture that can be easily changed with a few settings.
Based on the experience on dozens of projects, Lotus encourages the use of Ruby namespaces. In this way, growing code bases can be split without effort, avoiding monolithic applications.
Lotus has a smart mechanism of duplication of its frameworks, that allows multiple copy of a framework and multiple applications to run in the same Ruby process. In other words, even small Lotus applications are ready to be split in separated deliverables, but they can safely coexist in the same heap space.
For instance, when a Bookshelf::Application
is loaded, Lotus::View
and Lotus::Controller
are duplicated as Bookshelf::View
and Bookshelf::Controller
, in order to make their configurations completely independent from Backend::Application
. They may coexist happily in the same Ruby process.
Developers can therefore use Bookshelf::Controller
instead of Lotus::Controller
.
# config.ru
require 'lotus'
class TinyApp < Lotus::Application
configure do
routes do
get '/', to: ->(env) {[200, {}, ['Hello from Lotus!']]} # Direct Rack response
end
end
end
run TinyApp.new
# config.ru
require 'lotus'
module OneFile
class Application < Lotus::Application
configure do
routes do
get '/', to: 'home#index'
end
end
load!
end
module Controllers
module Home
include OneFile::Controller
action 'Index' do
def call(params)
end
end
end
end
module Views
module Home
class Index
include OneFile::View
def render
'Hello'
end
end
end
end
end
run OneFile::Application.new
When the application is instantiated, it will also create OneFile::Controllers
and OneFile::Views
namespace, to incentivize the modularization of the resources.
Also, note the similarity in names of the action and the view: OneFile::Controllers::Home::Index
and OneFile::Views::Home::Index
.
This naming system is a Lotus convention and MUST be followed, or otherwise configured.
test/fixtures/microservices
├── apps
│ ├── backend
│ │ ├── application.rb Backend::Application
│ │ ├── controllers
│ │ │ └── sessions.rb Backend::Controllers::Sessions::New, Create & Destroy
│ │ ├── public
│ │ │ ├── favicon.ico
│ │ │ ├── fonts
│ │ │ │ └── cabin-medium.woff
│ │ │ ├── images
│ │ │ │ └── application.jpg
│ │ │ ├── javascripts
│ │ │ │ └── application.js
│ │ │ └── stylesheets
│ │ │ └── application.css
│ │ ├── templates
│ │ │ ├── backend.html.erb
│ │ │ └── sessions
│ │ │ └── new.html.erb
│ │ └── views
│ │ ├── backend_layout.rb Backend::Views::BackendLayout
│ │ └── sessions
│ │ ├── create.rb Backend::Views::Sessions::Create
│ │ ├── destroy.rb Backend::Views::Sessions::Destroy
│ │ └── new.rb Backend::Views::Sessions::New
│ └── frontend
│ ├── application.rb Frontend::Application
│ ├── assets
│ │ ├── favicon.ico
│ │ ├── fonts
│ │ │ └── cabin-medium.woff
│ │ ├── images
│ │ │ └── application.jpg
│ │ ├── javascripts
│ │ │ └── application.js
│ │ └── stylesheets
│ │ └── application.css
│ ├── controllers
│ │ └── sessions
│ │ ├── create.rb Frontend::Controllers::Sessions::Create
│ │ ├── destroy.rb Frontend::Controllers::Sessions::Destroy
│ │ └── new.rb Frontend::Controllers::Sessions::New
│ ├── templates
│ │ ├── frontend.html.erb
│ │ └── sessions
│ │ └── new.html.erb
│ └── views
│ ├── application_layout.rb Frontend::Views::ApplicationLayout
│ └── sessions
│ ├── create.rb Frontend::Views::Sessions::Create
│ ├── destroy.rb Frontend::Views::Sessions::Destroy
│ └── new.rb Frontend::Views::Sessions::New
└── config.ru
As you can see, the code can be organized as you prefer. For instance, all the sessions actions for the backend are grouped in the same file, while they're split in the case of the frontend app.
This because Lotus doesn't have namespace-to-filename conventions, and doesn't have autoload paths. During the boot time it recursively preloads all the classes from the specified directories.
# apps/backend/application.rb
require 'lotus'
module Backend
class Application < Lotus::Application
configure do
# Specify a root here so that load paths, etc. are relative to your microservice.
root 'apps/backend'
load_paths << [
'controllers',
'views'
]
layout :backend
routes do
resource :sessions, only: [:new, :create, :destroy]
end
end
end
end
# All code under apps/backend/{controllers,views} will be loaded
# config.ru
require_relative 'apps/frontend/application'
require_relative 'apps/backend/application'
run Lotus::Router.new {
mount Backend::Application, at: '/backend'
mount Frontend::Application, at: '/'
}
# We use an instance of Lotus::Router to mount two Lotus applications
test/fixtures/furnitures
├── app
│ ├── controllers
│ │ └── furnitures
│ │ └── catalog_controller.rb Furnitures::CatalogController::Index
│ ├── templates
│ │ ├── application.html.erb
│ │ └── furnitures
│ │ └── catalog
│ │ └── index.html.erb
│ └── views
│ ├── application_layout.rb Furnitures::Views::ApplicationLayout
│ └── furnitures
│ └── catalog
│ └── index.rb Furnitures::Catalog::Index
├── application.rb Furnitures::Application
└── public
├── favicon.ico
├── fonts
│ └── cabin-medium.woff
├── images
│ └── application.jpg
├── javascripts
│ └── application.js
└── stylesheets
└── application.css
You may have noticed a different naming structure here. You can easily achieve this with a few setting changes.
# application.rb
require 'lotus'
module Furnitures
class Application < Lotus::Application
configure do
layout :application
routes do
get '/', to: 'catalog#index'
end
load_paths << 'app'
controller_pattern "%{controller}Controller::%{action}"
view_pattern "%{controller}::%{action}"
end
end
end
The patterns above indicate to Lotus the name structure that we want to use for our application.
The main actor of the HTTP layer is an action. Actions are classes grouped logically in the same module, called a controller.
For an incoming GET
request to /
, the router will look for a CatalogController
with an Index
action.
Once the action is called, the control will pass to the view. Here the application will look for a Catalog
module with an Index
view.
That two patterns are interpolated at the runtime, with the controller/action informations passed by the router.
test/fixtures/information_tech
├── app
│ ├── controllers
│ │ └── hardware_controller.rb HardwareController::Index
│ ├── templates
│ │ ├── app.html.erb
│ │ └── hardware
│ │ └── index.html.erb
│ └── views
│ ├── app_layout.rb AppLayout
│ └── hardware
│ └── index.rb Hardware::Index
├── application.rb InformationTech::Application
├── config
│ └── routes.rb
└── public
├── favicon.ico
├── fonts
│ └── cabin-medium.woff
├── images
│ └── application.jpg
├── javascripts
│ └── application.js
└── stylesheets
└── application.css
While this architecture is technically possible, it's discouraged, because it pollutes the global namespace and it makes hard to split in several deliverables, once the code base will be big enough.
# application.rb
require 'lotus'
module InformationTech
class Application < Lotus::Application
configure do
namespace Object
controller_pattern '%{controller}Controller::%{action}'
view_pattern '%{controller}::%{action}'
layout :app
load_paths << 'app'
routes 'config/routes'
end
end
end
# We use Object, because it's the top level Ruby namespace.
- Lotus expects controllers, actions and views to have a specific pattern (see Configuration for customizations)
- All the commands must be run from the root of the project. If this requirement cannot be satisfied, please hardcode the path with
Configuration#root
. - The template name must reflect the name of the corresponding view:
Bookshelf::Views::Dashboard::Index
fordashboard/index.html.erb
. - All the static files are served by the internal Rack middleware stack.
- The application expects to find static files under
public/
(seeConfiguration#assets
) - If the public folder doesn't exist, it doesn't serve static files.
- The application structure can be organized according to developer needs.
- No file-to-name convention: modules and classes can live in one or multiple files.
- No autoloading paths. They must be explicitly configured.
A Lotus application can be configured with a DSL that determines its behavior.
require 'lotus'
module Bookshelf
class Application < Lotus::Application
configure do
# Determines the root of the application (optional)
# Argument: String, Pathname, defaults to Dir.pwd
#
root 'path/to/root'
# The Ruby namespace where to lookup for actions and views (optional)
# Argument: Module, Class, defaults to the application module (eg. Bookshelf)
#
namespace Object
# The relative load paths where the application will recursively load the code (mandatory)
# Argument: String, Array<String>, defaults to empty set
#
load_paths << [
'app/controllers',
'app/views'
]
# The route set (mandatory)
# Argument: Proc with the routes definition
#
routes do
get '/', to: 'home#index'
end
# The route set (mandatory) (alternative usage)
# Argument: A relative path where to find the routes definition
#
routes 'config/routes'
# The layout to be used by all the views (optional)
# Argument: A Symbol that indicates the name, default to nil
#
layout :application # Will look for Bookshelf::Views::ApplicationLayout
# The relative path where to find the templates (optional)
# Argument: A string with the relative path, default to the root of the app
#
templates 'app/templates'
# Default format for the requests that don't specify an HTTP_ACCEPT header (optional)
# Argument: A symbol representation of a mime type, default to :html
#
default_format :json
# URI scheme used by the routing system to generate absoule URLs (optional)
# Argument: A string, default to "http"
#
scheme 'https'
# URI host used by the routing system to generate absoule URLs (optional)
# Argument: A string, default to "localhost"
#
host 'bookshelf.org'
# URI port used by the routing system to generate absoule URLs (optional)
# Argument: An object coercible to integer, default to 80 if the scheme is http and 443 if it's https
# This SHOULD be configured only in case the application listens to that non standard ports
#
port 2323
# The name pattern to find controller and actions (optional)
# Argument: A string, it must contain "%{controller}" and %{action}
# Default to "Controllers::%{controller}::%{action}"
#
controller_pattern '%{controller}Controller::%{action}'
# The name pattern to find views (optional)
# Argument: A string, it must contain "%{controller}" and %{action}
# Default to "Views::%{controller}::%{action}"
#
view_pattern '%{controller}Views::%{action}'
end
end
end
Lotus uses different approaches for web development with Ruby than other frameworks. For this reason, it needs to reach a certain degree of maturity. It will be improved by collecting the feedback of real world applications.
Lotus still lacks features like: live reloading, multiple environments, code generators, cli, etc..
Please get involved with the project.
Thank you.
- Fork it ( https://github.com/lotus/lotus/fork )
- Create your feature branch (
git checkout -b my-new-feature
) - Commit your changes (
git commit -am 'Add some feature'
) - Push to the branch (
git push origin my-new-feature
) - Create a new Pull Request
Lotus uses Semantic Versioning 2.0.0
Copyright 2014 Luca Guidi – Released under MIT License