Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Nimly easyCodeTouch_v1 lock #3580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

uvNikita
Copy link
Contributor

@uvNikita uvNikita commented Dec 3, 2024

Proposed change

Add missing nimly lock model.
Fixes #3457 (comment)

Additional information

#3457
#3465

Checklist

  • The changes are tested and work correctly
  • pre-commit checks pass / the code has been formatted using Black
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.79%. Comparing base (97413e3) to head (b51bb6b).
Report is 7 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #3580   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.79%   89.79%           
=======================================
  Files         323      323           
  Lines       10414    10414           
=======================================
  Hits         9351     9351           
  Misses       1063     1063           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@TheJulianJES TheJulianJES left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@TheJulianJES TheJulianJES merged commit 5f1a7f2 into zigpy:dev Dec 12, 2024
9 checks passed
@uvNikita uvNikita deleted the nimly/easyCodeTouch_v1 branch December 18, 2024 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants