-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: integration test #36
Conversation
@andresaiello please, review, thanks! |
|
||
if grep -E "^PRIVATE_KEY=[a-fA-F0-9]{64}$" .env; then | ||
echo "The .env file contains a valid PRIVATE_KEY entry without the 0x prefix." | ||
rm .env |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why you remove it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean why have rm .env
? The reason is in this section of the test I'm testing the key generation functionality, but I don't need the actual key for the rest of the test. I'm using a PRIVATE_KEY
env variable stored in GitHub secrets, which has enough tokens (both native and ZETA) to deploy and test contracts. At some point I'll add faucet to the test, but I'll probably still keep using the evn variable, because I need native gETH, for example, which I can't get from a faucet.
Running some basic commands to ensure that the main bits are working fine.
--fees zeta