Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix eglMakeCurrent and eglDestroySurface validation checks #4652

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 24.lts.1+
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexanderbobrovnik
Copy link
Collaborator

eglMakeCurrent and eglDestroySurface validation checks fail and exit earlier after device lost were detected, preventing the release of surface and underling swap chain.
This makes it impossible to recreate device after device lost.

b/329326128

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@amurovanyi amurovanyi requested a review from TyHolc January 9, 2025 18:34
Copy link
Contributor

@TyHolc TyHolc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there's some failing linux builds with this. Can you take a look at fix those?

@TyHolc TyHolc requested a review from jasonzhangxx January 9, 2025 20:41
@alexanderbobrovnik
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Some Linux checks failing with missing GLIBC_2.28 error, so, not related to this PR.

eglMakeCurrent and eglDestroySurface validation checks fail and exit
earlier after device lost were detected, preventing the release of
surface and underling swap chain.
This makes it impossible to recreate device after device lost.

b/329326128
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants