Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup check_vcpkg.yaml, remove option CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE, ... #6317

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SimonHeimberg
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change
Enhancement of a github workflow

Issue(s) closed
Fixes -

New behavior
remove option CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE from check_vcpkg.yaml, it got an empty value

There is no "config" in matrix.

The fixed line was introduced in 1be5a4e.

Additional context
Maybe a better approach is to configure a matrix with just one value for CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.
And add a comment above line 76 (which uses it), telling it is exactly the same as in ./build_windows*.yaml

…mpty value

There is no "config" in matrix.

The fixed line was introduced in 1be5a4e.
@bunnybot bunnybot added this to the v1.3 milestone Jan 15, 2024
@bunnybot
Copy link

tothxaMirrored from Codeberg
On Mon Jan 15 13:52:11 CET 2024, Tóth András (tothxa) wrote:


That's actually a copy-paste thing from the build(_vcpkg) workflow job. But yes, probably it can be removed from vcpkg update.

@bunnybot bunnybot added the ci:success CI checks succeeded label Apr 2, 2024
@matthiakl
Copy link
Member

Maybe a better approach is to configure a matrix with just one value for CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.
And add a comment above line 76 (which uses it), telling it is exactly the same as in ./build_windows*.yaml

+1 for having a reference. Does it make sense to move this step into a shared file called from both workflows?

@bunnybot bunnybot added ci:success CI checks succeeded and removed ci:success CI checks succeeded labels May 1, 2024
@bunnybot bunnybot added ci:success CI checks succeeded and removed ci:success CI checks succeeded labels May 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci:success CI checks succeeded
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants