Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: x64_*,arm64: Add decoders #215

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

WIP: x64_*,arm64: Add decoders #215

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

wader
Copy link
Owner

@wader wader commented Apr 1, 2022

No description provided.

@wader wader marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2022 17:58
@wader
Copy link
Owner Author

wader commented Apr 1, 2022

I will probably not work on this for a while so let me know if your interested

@peterwaller-arm
Copy link

❤️

@wader
Copy link
Owner Author

wader commented Apr 12, 2023

Hey, kind of forgot about this one. There are some questions how decoding of ISA:s would be modelled in fq and when it would be done, i guess an option that is disabled by default for ELF:s, macho etc?

Do you have any idea or use cases how it would work?

@peterwaller-arm
Copy link

I don't especially have thoughts on how it should work, to be fair, but I like the principle that fq should be able to interpret bytes wherever and whatever they may be, if nothing else so that a human may make sense of those bytes at some point in the pipeline.

I take it what you're saying is that if you started parsing bytes out of an ELF for example, it would bloat the output quite dramatically?

The simplest case I can think of is that fq could be given an elf and would by default act as a disassembler, parsing code in executable sections much like objdump -d would. It remains to be seen whether this is useful/a good idea though?

@wader
Copy link
Owner Author

wader commented Apr 12, 2023

Rebased on master so you can try it. The disassembler is based on https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/arch and there is some half-working symbol lookup support.

Looks like this:

➜  fq git:(isa2) ✗ go run . -o line_bytes=8 'grep_by(.name==".init").code | d' format/elf/testdata/linux_amd64/a_dynamic
      │00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07│01234567│.section_headers[8].code[0:5]:
      │                       │        │  [0]{}: instruction
0x1000│50                     │P       │    opcode: "50" (raw bits)
      │                       │        │    op: "push" (0x50000000)
      │                       │        │  [1]{}: instruction
0x1000│   e8 ca 01 00 00      │ .....  │    opcode: "e8ca010000" (raw bits)
      │                       │        │    op: "call" (0xe8000000)
      │                       │        │  [2]{}: instruction
0x1000│                  e8 35│      .5│    opcode: "e835020000" (raw bits)
0x1008│02 00 00               │...     │
      │                       │        │    op: "call" (0xe8000000)
      │                       │        │  [3]{}: instruction
0x1008│         58            │   X    │    opcode: "58" (raw bits)
      │                       │        │    op: "pop" (0x58000000)
      │                       │        │  [4]{}: instruction
0x1008│            c3         │    .   │    opcode: "c3" (raw bits)
      │                       │        │    op: "ret" (0xc3000000)

# same with objdump
➜  fq git:(isa2) ✗ objdump --section=.init -D format/elf/testdata/linux_amd64/a_dynamic

format/elf/testdata/linux_amd64/a_dynamic:      file format elf64-x86-64

Disassembly of section .init:

0000000000001000 <_init>:
    1000: 50                            pushq   %rax
    1001: e8 ca 01 00 00                callq   0x11d0 <frame_dummy>
    1006: e8 35 02 00 00                callq   0x1240 <__do_global_ctors_aux>
    100b: 58                            popq    %rax
    100c: c3                            retq

All very work-in-progress and mostly just an experiment, but looks promising i think. But there might be quite a bit of work to make it usable, for example maybe the disassembly output should be more standard? how to decode in elf etc, should instructions be split even more somehow? more isas?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants