-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge release/v1.3.0
to develop
#5387
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on enhancing type safety and refining state management across multiple components in the Actions module. The changes primarily involve updating type definitions for Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx (1)
34-38
: LGTM! Consider adding return type annotation.The type annotations for parameters improve type safety while maintaining backward compatibility.
Consider adding a return type annotation for better type inference and documentation:
export const useHighlightHover = ( disabled: boolean, override: null | boolean = null, color: null | string = null -) => { +): { + style: { + backgroundColor: string; + color: string; + cursor: "default" | "pointer"; + }; + onMouseEnter: () => void; + onMouseLeave: () => void; +} => {app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (2)
67-69
: Consider simplifying the click handler condition.The current condition is a bit complex and could be simplified for better readability.
Consider this alternative:
-!( - e.target === ref.current || ref.current?.contains(e.target as Node) -) && +!ref.current?.contains(e.target as Node) &&The simplified version achieves the same result as
contains()
also checks for equality.
97-97
: Consider making the count check more explicit.While the nullish coalescing operator works, the intent could be more clear.
Consider this alternative for better readability:
-(count ?? 0) > 0 ? numeral(count).format("0,0") : "0" +count === null ? "0" : count > 0 ? numeral(count).format("0,0") : "0"app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (2)
1-1
: Consider enhancing analytics tracking.While adding analytics tracking is good, the event could include more properties for better insights.
Consider adding more properties to the analytics event, such as:
- The number of items being tagged
- The type of tagging (bulk vs single)
- The source of the action (keyboard vs click)
Also applies to: 102-102
205-205
: Consider enhancing the clear functionality.While resetting the value is good, consider a more comprehensive reset that includes other related states.
Consider updating the clear function to reset all related states:
-clear={() => setValue("")} +clear={() => { + setValue(""); + setActive(null); + setChanges({}); +}}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
(8 hunks)app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx
(5 hunks)app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}
: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}
: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}
: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: build / build
- GitHub Check: test / test-app
- GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.11)
- GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.10)
- GitHub Check: lint / eslint
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (1)
33-37
: Well-structured type definitions!The explicit null handling in type definitions improves type safety and makes the component's state management more robust.
Also applies to: 154-161
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (1)
189-189
: Verify consistent event handling across the component.The changes properly handle event propagation and state cleanup. Let's verify if similar patterns are needed elsewhere.
Also applies to: 191-191
✅ Verification successful
Event handling is consistent throughout the component
The component has consistent event handling patterns where
stopPropagation
is properly used alongside state updates. No additional changes are needed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other keyboard event handlers that might need similar updates ast-grep --pattern 'onKeyDown($$$)'Length of output: 229
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for keyboard event handlers and stopPropagation in Tagger.tsx echo "=== Keyboard event handlers in Tagger.tsx ===" rg "onKeyDown|onKeyPress|onKeyUp" app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx -A 2 echo -e "\n=== stopPropagation usage in Tagger.tsx ===" rg "stopPropagation" app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx -A 2Length of output: 734
@@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ const Checker = ({ | |||
value: sorted.filter(([n]) => n === active)[0][1], | |||
setChange, | |||
})(); | |||
clear(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent clear behavior confirmed between keyboard and click handlers
The keyboard handler calls clear()
after submission (line 207), but the click handler in the Check component (lines 231-232) only calls submit
via the onCheck
prop without clearing. This creates inconsistent behavior between keyboard and mouse interactions.
- Add
clear()
after thesubmit()
call in thecreateSubmit
function (around line 221) to ensure consistent behavior across all interaction methods.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure consistent behavior between keyboard and click handlers.
The clear()
function is called after submit in the keyboard handler but not in the click handler. This could lead to inconsistent behavior.
Consider adding the clear call in the click handler as well. Let's verify if there are other submit handlers that might need the same update:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for submit handlers in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'submit($$$)'
Length of output: 454
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for click and keyboard handlers in Checker.tsx
echo "=== Click handlers ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'onClick={$_}' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Keyboard handlers ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'useKeydownHandler' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
Length of output: 496
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get broader context of the component implementation
echo "=== Component implementation ==="
rg -U "export function Checker.*?\n}" -A 50 app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Component Definition ==="
# First try with ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'export function Checker' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Component Implementation ==="
# Fallback to simpler ripgrep with context
rg "function Checker" -B 2 -A 30 app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== File Content ==="
cat app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Alternative Declarations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'const Checker = $_' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
Length of output: 12921
Cherry picking fixes for release
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)
23-29
: Enhance type safety with TypeScript annotations.While the value coercion logic is sound, the code would benefit from TypeScript type annotations for better type safety and developer experience.
Consider adding type annotations:
- const onIOChange = useCallback( + const onIOChange = useCallback<( + path: string, + value: unknown, + schema: SchemaType, + ancestors: Record<string, SchemaType> + ) => void>( (path, value, schema, ancestors) => { const computedValue = coerceValue(value, schema);app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)
39-44
: Consider documenting the schema fallback behavior.The schema fallback chain (
schema ?? subSchema ?? computedSchema
) improves reliability but could benefit from documentation explaining the precedence rules.Add a comment explaining the schema resolution order:
+ // Schema resolution order: + // 1. Explicitly provided schema + // 2. Sub-schema from composite views + // 3. Computed schema with inherited properties onChange( path, value, schema ?? subSchema ?? computedSchema, computedAncestors );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx
(1 hunks)app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}
: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)
Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}
: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
- GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.10)
- GitHub Check: test / test-app
- GitHub Check: e2e / test-e2e
- GitHub Check: lint / eslint
- GitHub Check: build / build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
61-71
: Add unit tests for edge cases in coerceValue function.The
coerceValue
function handles important data transformations but lacks test coverage for edge cases.Consider testing:
- Arrays with undefined/null elements
- Mixed type arrays
- Non-string values when schema type is string
- Invalid schema types
Would you like me to help generate comprehensive test cases?
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)
38-45
: Verify schema compatibility across fallback chain.The schema fallback mechanism assumes compatibility between different schema types.
Let's verify schema compatibility across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Schema fallback chain is type-safe and properly implemented
The schema fallback mechanism is verified to be safe as all schema variants (
schema
,subSchema
,computedSchema
) extend fromBaseSchemaType
and maintain a consistent structure with proper type checking.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all schema type definitions and usages ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = { type: string $$$}' \ --pattern 'interface $name { type: string $$$}' # Search for schema transformations rg -A 5 'schema\s*[?]{2}'Length of output: 1676
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for schema type definitions ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = { $$$type$$$: $$$}' # Search for schema interfaces ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name { $$$type$$$: $$$}' # Look for schema validation or transformation functions rg -A 3 'function.*Schema|validateSchema|transformSchema'Length of output: 9007
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find SchemaType definition and related types rg -A 5 "type (Schema|SchemaType|ArraySchemaType|NumberSchemaType)" # Find schema-related type imports rg "import.*Schema.*from"Length of output: 9679
Bump ETA/Brain versions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Merging so we can propagate dependency version bumps
Merge
release/v1.3.0
todevelop
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Dependency Updates
fiftyone-brain
to version 0.19.0voxel51-eta
to version 0.14.0Performance Improvements