Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge release/v1.3.0 to develop #5387

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Merge release/v1.3.0 to develop #5387

merged 11 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

voxel51-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@voxel51-bot voxel51-bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Merge release/v1.3.0 to develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced type safety for active and count states in components
    • Improved event handling and state management
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined control flow for handling null and undefined states
    • Updated component logic to prevent unintended event propagation
  • Dependency Updates

    • Upgraded fiftyone-brain to version 0.19.0
    • Upgraded voxel51-eta to version 0.14.0
  • Performance Improvements

    • Implemented more robust value coercion mechanisms
    • Optimized state management in core components

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on enhancing type safety and refining state management across multiple components in the Actions module. The changes primarily involve updating type definitions for CheckProps and CheckerProps, introducing null-able types for count and active properties, and modifying event handling logic. The modifications span five files: Checker.tsx, Tagger.tsx, utils.tsx, DynamicIO.tsx, and index.tsx, with a consistent theme of improving type annotations and component flexibility.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx - Updated CheckProps and CheckerProps interfaces to allow null values for count and active
- Modified ref initialization and click handler
- Added clear() function
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx - Updated active state type to `null
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx - Added type annotations to useHighlightHover function parameters
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx - Updated onChangeWithSchema function to include computedSchema as a fallback
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx - Replaced value with computedValue in onIOChange callback to ensure coerced values are used
setup.py - Updated version constraints for fiftyone-brain and voxel51-eta dependencies

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • findtopher

Poem

🐰 In the code, we hop and play,
With types that guide us on our way.
Nulls and strings, all in their place,
Our components shine with a happy face!
A rabbit's joy in every line,
Type safety makes our code divine! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0012161 and 55da2ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test / test-app
  • GitHub Check: build / build
  • GitHub Check: e2e / test-e2e
  • GitHub Check: lint / eslint
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
setup.py (2)

77-77: Verify compatibility with major version updates.

Both internal dependencies have received major version bumps:

  • fiftyone-brain: 0.18.x → 0.19.x
  • voxel51-eta: 0.13.x → 0.14.x

Major version updates typically indicate breaking changes. Please ensure all breaking changes have been addressed.

Let's verify the changelog entries and breaking changes:

Also applies to: 79-79


Line range hint 13-13: Verify version consistency with release branch.

The VERSION is set to "1.4.0" but we're merging from release/v1.3.0. Please verify if this is intentional as part of preparing for the next version.

Let's check the version history:

✅ Verification successful

Version bump to 1.4.0 appears intentional

This is a common versioning pattern where the main branch's version is bumped to the next development version (1.4.0) while merging from a release branch (v1.3.0). This allows for parallel development of new features while stabilizing the release.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version history and branch patterns

# Look for version patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking version patterns..."
rg -i "1\.[34]\.[0-9]" --type py

# Look for version-related files
echo "Checking version-related files..."
fd -i -g '*version*'

Length of output: 352


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for version-related documentation and guidelines
echo "Checking for version-related documentation..."
fd -e md -e rst -e txt -X rg -i -l "version|release|bump"

# Look specifically for changelog and contributing guidelines
echo "Checking for CHANGELOG and CONTRIBUTING files..."
fd -i -g '*change*|*contrib*|*release*'

Length of output: 2121


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of key files
echo "Checking CONTRIBUTING.md for version guidelines..."
cat CONTRIBUTING.md

echo -e "\nChecking release notes..."
cat docs/source/release-notes.rst

echo -e "\nChecking setup.py context..."
cat setup.py

Length of output: 72712


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Try to read just the VERSION line from setup.py with context
echo "Checking VERSION definition context..."
rg -B 2 -A 2 'VERSION = ' setup.py

Length of output: 145

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx (1)

34-38: LGTM! Consider adding return type annotation.

The type annotations for parameters improve type safety while maintaining backward compatibility.

Consider adding a return type annotation for better type inference and documentation:

 export const useHighlightHover = (
   disabled: boolean,
   override: null | boolean = null,
   color: null | string = null
-) => {
+): {
+  style: {
+    backgroundColor: string;
+    color: string;
+    cursor: "default" | "pointer";
+  };
+  onMouseEnter: () => void;
+  onMouseLeave: () => void;
+} => {
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (2)

67-69: Consider simplifying the click handler condition.

The current condition is a bit complex and could be simplified for better readability.

Consider this alternative:

-!(
-  e.target === ref.current || ref.current?.contains(e.target as Node)
-) &&
+!ref.current?.contains(e.target as Node) &&

The simplified version achieves the same result as contains() also checks for equality.


97-97: Consider making the count check more explicit.

While the nullish coalescing operator works, the intent could be more clear.

Consider this alternative for better readability:

-(count ?? 0) > 0 ? numeral(count).format("0,0") : "0"
+count === null ? "0" : count > 0 ? numeral(count).format("0,0") : "0"
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (2)

1-1: Consider enhancing analytics tracking.

While adding analytics tracking is good, the event could include more properties for better insights.

Consider adding more properties to the analytics event, such as:

  • The number of items being tagged
  • The type of tagging (bulk vs single)
  • The source of the action (keyboard vs click)

Also applies to: 102-102


205-205: Consider enhancing the clear functionality.

While resetting the value is good, consider a more comprehensive reset that includes other related states.

Consider updating the clear function to reset all related states:

-clear={() => setValue("")}
+clear={() => {
+  setValue("");
+  setActive(null);
+  setChanges({});
+}}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a42cd44 and f1b794d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (8 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (5 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/utils.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build / build
  • GitHub Check: test / test-app
  • GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: lint / eslint
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx (1)

33-37: Well-structured type definitions!

The explicit null handling in type definitions improves type safety and makes the component's state management more robust.

Also applies to: 154-161

app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx (1)

189-189: Verify consistent event handling across the component.

The changes properly handle event propagation and state cleanup. Let's verify if similar patterns are needed elsewhere.

Also applies to: 191-191

✅ Verification successful

Event handling is consistent throughout the component

The component has consistent event handling patterns where stopPropagation is properly used alongside state updates. No additional changes are needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other keyboard event handlers that might need similar updates
ast-grep --pattern 'onKeyDown($$$)'

Length of output: 229


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for keyboard event handlers and stopPropagation in Tagger.tsx
echo "=== Keyboard event handlers in Tagger.tsx ==="
rg "onKeyDown|onKeyPress|onKeyUp" app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx -A 2

echo -e "\n=== stopPropagation usage in Tagger.tsx ==="
rg "stopPropagation" app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Tagger.tsx -A 2

Length of output: 734

@@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ const Checker = ({
value: sorted.filter(([n]) => n === active)[0][1],
setChange,
})();
clear();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Inconsistent clear behavior confirmed between keyboard and click handlers

The keyboard handler calls clear() after submission (line 207), but the click handler in the Check component (lines 231-232) only calls submit via the onCheck prop without clearing. This creates inconsistent behavior between keyboard and mouse interactions.

  • Add clear() after the submit() call in the createSubmit function (around line 221) to ensure consistent behavior across all interaction methods.
🔗 Analysis chain

Ensure consistent behavior between keyboard and click handlers.

The clear() function is called after submit in the keyboard handler but not in the click handler. This could lead to inconsistent behavior.

Consider adding the clear call in the click handler as well. Let's verify if there are other submit handlers that might need the same update:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for submit handlers in the codebase
ast-grep --pattern 'submit($$$)'

Length of output: 454


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for click and keyboard handlers in Checker.tsx
echo "=== Click handlers ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'onClick={$_}' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx
echo -e "\n=== Keyboard handlers ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'useKeydownHandler' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

Length of output: 496


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get broader context of the component implementation
echo "=== Component implementation ==="
rg -U "export function Checker.*?\n}" -A 50 app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

Length of output: 173


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Component Definition ==="
# First try with ast-grep
ast-grep --pattern 'export function Checker' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

echo -e "\n=== Component Implementation ==="
# Fallback to simpler ripgrep with context
rg "function Checker" -B 2 -A 30 app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

Length of output: 335


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== File Content ==="
cat app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

echo -e "\n=== Alternative Declarations ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'const Checker = $_' app/packages/core/src/components/Actions/Checker.tsx

Length of output: 12921

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)

23-29: Enhance type safety with TypeScript annotations.

While the value coercion logic is sound, the code would benefit from TypeScript type annotations for better type safety and developer experience.

Consider adding type annotations:

- const onIOChange = useCallback(
+ const onIOChange = useCallback<(
+   path: string,
+   value: unknown,
+   schema: SchemaType,
+   ancestors: Record<string, SchemaType>
+ ) => void>(
    (path, value, schema, ancestors) => {
      const computedValue = coerceValue(value, schema);
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)

39-44: Consider documenting the schema fallback behavior.

The schema fallback chain (schema ?? subSchema ?? computedSchema) improves reliability but could benefit from documentation explaining the precedence rules.

Add a comment explaining the schema resolution order:

+ // Schema resolution order:
+ // 1. Explicitly provided schema
+ // 2. Sub-schema from composite views
+ // 3. Computed schema with inherited properties
  onChange(
    path,
    value,
    schema ?? subSchema ?? computedSchema,
    computedAncestors
  );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1b794d and 0012161.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: test / test-python (ubuntu-latest-m, 3.10)
  • GitHub Check: test / test-app
  • GitHub Check: e2e / test-e2e
  • GitHub Check: lint / eslint
  • GitHub Check: build / build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 61-71: Add unit tests for edge cases in coerceValue function.

The coerceValue function handles important data transformations but lacks test coverage for edge cases.

Consider testing:

  1. Arrays with undefined/null elements
  2. Mixed type arrays
  3. Non-string values when schema type is string
  4. Invalid schema types

Would you like me to help generate comprehensive test cases?

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/DynamicIO.tsx (1)

38-45: Verify schema compatibility across fallback chain.

The schema fallback mechanism assumes compatibility between different schema types.

Let's verify schema compatibility across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Schema fallback chain is type-safe and properly implemented

The schema fallback mechanism is verified to be safe as all schema variants (schema, subSchema, computedSchema) extend from BaseSchemaType and maintain a consistent structure with proper type checking.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all schema type definitions and usages
ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = { type: string $$$}' \
  --pattern 'interface $name { type: string $$$}'

# Search for schema transformations
rg -A 5 'schema\s*[?]{2}'

Length of output: 1676


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for schema type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type $name = { $$$type$$$: $$$}'

# Search for schema interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $name { $$$type$$$: $$$}'

# Look for schema validation or transformation functions
rg -A 3 'function.*Schema|validateSchema|transformSchema'

Length of output: 9007


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find SchemaType definition and related types
rg -A 5 "type (Schema|SchemaType|ArraySchemaType|NumberSchemaType)"

# Find schema-related type imports
rg "import.*Schema.*from"

Length of output: 9679

Copy link
Contributor

@brimoor brimoor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merging so we can propagate dependency version bumps

@brimoor brimoor merged commit f28e515 into develop Jan 16, 2025
14 checks passed
@brimoor brimoor deleted the merge/release/v1.3.0 branch January 16, 2025 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants