require eslint for PRs #4391
require eslint for PRs #4391
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@benjaminpkane has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 59 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent changes involve the introduction of a new GitHub Actions workflow for code linting triggered by pull requests. This includes adding a job named Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
- app/eslint-packages.txt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
- app/eslint-packages.txt
.github/workflows/lint.yml
Outdated
|
|
||
| - name: Read ESLint Packages List and Lint | ||
| run: | | ||
| cd app |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should probably move this into app/package.json so that we can run this during development.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (1 hunks)
- app/eslint-packages.txt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml
- app/eslint-packages.txt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/lint-app.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (no review received)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/lint-app.yml (1)
1-34: The linting workflow is well-structured and complete.The workflow correctly sets up Node.js, caches dependencies, installs necessary packages, and runs ESLint on specified packages. This ensures that the linting process is efficient and effective.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/lint-app.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/workflows/lint-app.yml
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (6)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorPromptFooter.tsx (1)
7-7: Add a comment explaining the purpose of importingSubmitButtonOption.It's good practice to include a brief comment explaining why specific imports are used, especially when they relate to types or components that might not be immediately obvious to other developers or in large projects.
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (5)
Line range hint
108-108: Use a specific type instead ofanyfor error handling.The use of
anyfor error handling in theOperatorResultclass can obscure the nature of errors and make debugging more difficult. It's advisable to use a more specific type or at least provide a structure for the expected error object.
Line range hint
327-327: Avoid usinganyfor operator parameters.The use of
anyfor operator parameters in theresolveInputmethod reduces type safety and clarity. Defining a specific type for these parameters can help prevent bugs and improve code readability.
Line range hint
420-420: Specify a type forparamsinAbortableOperation.The use of
anyfor theparamsproperty in theAbortableOperationclass can lead to potential type safety issues. It's recommended to define a more specific type to ensure robustness and maintainability.
Line range hint
675-675: Define a specific type forparamsinGeneratedMessage.Using
anyfor theparamsproperty in theGeneratedMessageclass reduces type safety. Defining a specific type would enhance the robustness and maintainability of the code.
Line range hint
901-901: Use a specific type instead ofanyforparamsinAbortableOperationQueue.The repeated use of
anyfor theparamsproperty in theAbortableOperationQueueclass can lead to potential type safety issues. It's advisable to define a more specific type to ensure robustness and maintainability.
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml (2 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/.eslintrc (1 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/babel.config.js (1 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/OperatorInvocationRequestExecutor.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/OperatorPalette.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/built-in-operators.ts (18 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorPromptFooter.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (6 hunks)
- app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- app/packages/operators/.eslintrc
- app/packages/operators/babel.config.js
- app/packages/operators/src/OperatorInvocationRequestExecutor.tsx
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pr.yml
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
lint / eslint failure (12)
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 54-54:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 73-73:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 108-108:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 327-327:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 420-420:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 675-675:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 901-901:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts: [warning] 901-901:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
Path-based Instructions (5)
app/packages/operators/src/components/OperatorPromptFooter.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/operators/src/OperatorPalette.tsx (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/operators/src/built-in-operators.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/operators/src/operators.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.app/packages/operators/src/types.ts (1)
Pattern
**/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/packages/operators/src/OperatorPalette.tsx (1)
112-112: ExportSubmitButtonOptiontype with a detailed comment.The export of the
SubmitButtonOptiontype is a good practice as it allows for reusability and better type checking across the project. However, adding a detailed comment explaining the structure and use-case of this type can enhance maintainability and clarity for other developers.
| required?: boolean; | ||
| defaultValue?: any; | ||
| default?: any; | ||
| invalid?: boolean; | ||
| errorMessage?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor PropertyOptions to remove redundant default field.
The PropertyOptions type includes both defaultValue and default. This redundancy can be confusing and error-prone. It's recommended to keep only defaultValue to align with the changes suggested in the Property constructor.
- default?: any;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| required?: boolean; | |
| defaultValue?: any; | |
| default?: any; | |
| invalid?: boolean; | |
| errorMessage?: string; | |
| required?: boolean; | |
| defaultValue?: any; | |
| invalid?: boolean; | |
| errorMessage?: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/lint-app.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/lint-app.yml
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4391 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 16.02% 99.28% +83.25%
============================================
Files 804 46 -758
Lines 89221 16005 -73216
Branches 1340 0 -1340
============================================
+ Hits 14300 15890 +1590
+ Misses 74921 115 -74806
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
lintin the.github/workflows/pr.ymlfile to utilize the linting workflow.eslint-packages.txtfile to manage linting for specific packages.lint-app.ymlfile.operatorspackage.