-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
15 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
version = '3.11_rc0' | ||
version = '3.11' |
e3a189b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ultrabug Greeting, I have a solution. Ugly, but speedy. Hear me out.
Let me do what I want for
py3status version 3.12
. I aim to close many issues and pull requests as I can for a day.Some things won't be merged since I request a feedback from your friend.
Some things would be new, but I do not expect any problems with merging.
Some things would be rage-inducing, but would close an issue or two.
Some things we could merge and let users report bugs.
Some things I would like to go through again... Those won't be merged.
Some configs will be dropped because of transference between formats, missed backward compatibility, or conflicts. However, this would simplify things more because we would have fewer issues, pull requests and bugs. Users would be exposed with new changes... eg, more colors, more configs, more things to customize, and even the new modules too.
After
py3status version 3.12
, you can delist me from collaborators. And when my pull requests gets zeroed out (definitely not in3.12
), you can block me for contributing too much to this project. I think it would make your friend happy. Ecstatic, even. 😁This should happen soon so we can release
3.12
next day... as to skip out on having to deprecate (missed) pluralpath/paths
inconsistency and for me to clear out things I'm finished with, but sometimes still perform idle tweaks on. Caveats: Post-reviews and not reverting.TL;DR: Can I haz
3.12
? Collaborator for a day?e3a189b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ultrabug & @tobes, given how much value @lasers has already brought to py3status, I think you should really consider giving him permanent collaborator permissions and letting him cleanup the PRs backlog. It feels sad seeing the amount of open issues and PRs, and @lasers since has time and energy to actively maintain the project, I believe we should give him the opportunity.
This is a responsibility, but I think @lasers can handle it, he is already familiar with all the concepts and style guides used in py3status.
Finally, I simply prefer using projects with active development and frequent updates. Even if you (or anyone) spot an issue in a PR that was merged a week ago, it's very easy to improve upon it in a new PR, or in a worst case revert the offending commit, and release a new version.
e3a189b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello guys, sorry for the late reply. I released 3.11 just before going for a bit of vacation.
@lasers I trust and value you very much even if my response time is not the best, once again I apologize for this. I hear what you say @maximbaz and for full disclosure @cyrinux has told me something similar.
I will not do collaborator status for a day, either you have the rights or you don't. This is a relationship that needs to be discussed directly as we did with @tobes before he became collaborator.
That's why I think github is not the place for this conversation to happen. IRC is, and I will be very pleased to have a chat with you there.
Please try to be around and ping me there @lasers we'll sort this very quickly. We just need to "meet and commit together" 👍
Kindly