Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Deferred cancellation on client reset #562

Closed

Conversation

KentShikama
Copy link

See #546.

We have been running a similar patch on our enterprise production systems for about 6 months with no issues, and critically we have stopped getting issues on client resets.

See twisted#546.

We have been running a similar patch on our enterprise production systems for about 6 months with no issues, and critically we have stopped getting issues on client resets.
@KentShikama KentShikama marked this pull request as ready for review August 16, 2022 20:04
@KentShikama KentShikama requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2022 20:04
@adiroiban
Copy link
Member

without automated tests is hard to know if this works or not.
It might work for your case, but might introduce error to others...

I am not using klein, so I don't know.

It was just a general comment

Also, I am not sure why the CI was not triggered for this PR.

Copy link
Member

@glyph glyph left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs automated tests, as @adiroiban said. But also, this functionality exists for a reason, and I explained some of the design constraints on #562. (Thanks for writing up the issue separately from the PR so we can discuss the design & implementation separately :))

@glyph
Copy link
Member

glyph commented Oct 3, 2022

I'm also not sure what's going on with CI; sorry that it's broken. Can you reword / force-push or push another commit to see if it's just a flake on github's side?

@KentShikama
Copy link
Author

I'm going to close until discussion at #546 is resolved.

@KentShikama KentShikama closed this Dec 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants