Upgrade to Remix Vite #1496
Upgrade to Remix Vite #1496
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files in the web application. Key changes include updates to import statements for various modules, the introduction of a new function for parsing environment variables, and adjustments to the handling of cookies for authentication. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint (1.23.1)
apps/webapp/server.js(node:17322) ESLintIgnoreWarning: The ".eslintignore" file is no longer supported. Switch to using the "ignores" property in "eslint.config.js": https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide#ignoring-files Oops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.15.0 ESLint couldn't find an eslint.config.(js|mjs|cjs) file. From ESLint v9.0.0, the default configuration file is now eslint.config.js. https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/migration-guide If you still have problems after following the migration guide, please stop by Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (23)
apps/webapp/vite.config.ts (3)
9-9: Clarify the usage of Infisical for environment variablesThe TODO comment suggests replacing
dotenvanddotenv-expandwith Infisical. If Infisical is the preferred solution for managing environment variables, consider integrating it to enhance security and streamline configuration. This will help in centralizing secret management and could improve development workflows.If you decide to proceed, you might replace lines 10-14 with Infisical's initialization code. Ensure that all environment variables are correctly loaded and that this change aligns with your team's practices.
18-78: Consider merging Vite and Vitest configurationsAs mentioned in the PR objectives, merging Vite and Vitest configurations can simplify your setup and reduce duplication. Since both tools can share similar configurations, especially regarding plugins and path resolutions, consolidating them could improve maintainability.
You might refactor your configuration files to export a base configuration that both Vite and Vitest can extend. This ensures consistency across your development and testing environments.
31-45: Simplify module resolution for Node.js built-in modulesThe aliases for Node.js built-in modules might not be necessary if the dependencies are correctly configured. Instead of manually aliasing each module, consider enabling the
resolveoptionpreferBuiltinsor using thenodePolyfillsplugin to handle this automatically.Option 1: Use the
preferBuiltinsoption:resolve: { - alias: [ - { find: "https", replacement: "node:https" }, - { find: "path", replacement: "node:path" }, - { find: "os", replacement: "node:os" }, - // ... other aliases - ], + preferBuiltins: true, },Option 2: Use the
@vitejs/plugin-node-polyfillsplugin:npm install --save-dev @vitejs/plugin-node-polyfillsThen update your plugins:
+import NodeGlobalsPolyfillPlugin from '@vitejs/plugin-node-polyfills'; plugins: [ + NodeGlobalsPolyfillPlugin(), // ... other plugins ],Ensure that this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects.
apps/webapp/server/app.ts (1)
82-90: Enhance error message for invalid WebSocket pathsThe error message could be more informative to aid in debugging connection issues.
Consider including the attempted path in the error message:
- new Error( - "Cannot connect because of invalid path: Please include `/ws` in the path of your upgrade request." - ) + new Error( + `Cannot connect because of invalid path '${url.pathname}': Please include '/ws' in the path of your upgrade request.` + )apps/webapp/server.js (1)
76-86: Simplify the Morgan logging skip conditionsThe
skipfunction in the Morgan logger excludes certain requests from logging. Consider combining the conditions using a regular expression for improved readability.Apply this diff to streamline the conditions:
skip: (req) => { - if (req.url.startsWith("/@")) return true; - if (req.url.match(/\.[jt]sx?$/)) return true; - return false; + return /^\/@|\.(j|t)sx?$/.test(req.url); },apps/webapp/app/v3/eventRepository.server.ts (3)
Line range hint
680-706: Consider reusing Redis client instances to optimize connectionsIn the
subscribeToTracemethod, a new Redis client is instantiated for each subscription, which could lead to a large number of open connections if there are many subscribers. Consider refactoring to reuse a single Redis client instance or implement a connection pool to manage Redis connections more efficiently.
Line range hint
604-615: Use a stronger hash function for span ID generationThe
#generateDeterministicSpanIdmethod uses SHA-1, which is considered deprecated for cryptographic purposes. While this may not be critical for generating IDs, it's recommended to use a stronger hash function like SHA-256 for better security and future-proofing.You can update the code as follows:
- const hash = createHash("sha1"); + const hash = createHash("sha256");
Line range hint
972-974: Improve time precision in 'getNowInNanoseconds' functionThe
getNowInNanosecondsfunction usesDate.getTime(), which provides millisecond precision. For nanosecond precision, consider usingprocess.hrtime.bigint()to get a high-resolution timestamp.Update the function as follows:
-function getNowInNanoseconds(): bigint { - return BigInt(new Date().getTime() * 1_000_000); +function getNowInNanoseconds(): bigint { + return process.hrtime.bigint(); }apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts (2)
Line range hint
9-13: Add URL validation for redirectTo parameterThe
redirectToURL is used without validation, which could lead to open redirect vulnerabilities. Consider validating the URL to ensure it points to your application's domain.Here's a suggested implementation:
const url = new URL(request.url); const redirectTo = url.searchParams.get("redirectTo"); +const isValidRedirect = redirectTo + ? new URL(redirectTo, request.url).origin === new URL(request.url).origin + : true; + +if (!isValidRedirect) { + throw new Error("Invalid redirect URL"); +}
Line range hint
24-27: Improve error handling for cookie serializationThe
redirectCookie.serialize()call could throw an error, but it's not handled. Consider wrapping it in a try-catch block.if (error instanceof Response) { - error.headers.append("Set-Cookie", await redirectCookie.serialize(redirectTo)); + try { + const cookieHeader = await redirectCookie.serialize(redirectTo); + error.headers.append("Set-Cookie", cookieHeader); + } catch (cookieError) { + console.error("Failed to serialize redirect cookie:", cookieError); + // Proceed with the redirect without the cookie + } }apps/webapp/tsconfig.json (1)
5-5: LGTM! Consider optimizing type order.The addition of
@remix-run/nodeandvite/clienttypes is correct for the Remix Vite migration. Consider movingvitest/globalsfirst in the array as test types should generally take precedence to avoid any potential conflicts with runtime types.- "types": ["@remix-run/node", "vite/client", "vitest/globals"], + "types": ["vitest/globals", "@remix-run/node", "vite/client"],apps/webapp/app/v3/handleWebsockets.server.ts (2)
10-13: Consider improving the state management patternWhile moving the declaration fixes the ReferenceError, the current implementation could be enhanced:
- Use
constinstead ofletsince the map reference itself doesn't need to be reassigned- Consider encapsulating the connections map within the singleton pattern
Here's a suggested refactor:
-// Moved in front of export const wss because -// ReferenceError: Cannot access 'authenticatedConnections' before initialization -let authenticatedConnections: Map<string, AuthenticatedSocketConnection>; - -export const wss = singleton("wss", initalizeWebSocketServer); +const authenticatedConnections = new Map<string, AuthenticatedSocketConnection>(); + +export const wss = singleton("wss", () => initalizeWebSocketServer(authenticatedConnections));Then update the initialization function to accept the map:
function initalizeWebSocketServer( connections: Map<string, AuthenticatedSocketConnection> ) { const server = new WebSocketServer({ noServer: true }); server.on("connection", (ws, req) => handleWebSocketConnection(ws, req, connections) ); // ... rest of the function }
Line range hint
1-9: Consider separating metrics setup from WebSocket handlingThe file currently handles both WebSocket server initialization and metrics setup. Consider extracting the metrics setup into a separate module for better separation of concerns.
You could create a new file
websocketMetrics.server.tsto handle all WebSocket-related metrics, making the code more modular and easier to maintain.Example structure:
// websocketMetrics.server.ts export function initializeWebSocketMetrics(connections: Map<string, AuthenticatedSocketConnection>) { return new Gauge({ name: "dev_authenticated_connections", help: "Number of authenticated dev connections", collect() { this.set(connections.size); }, registers: [metricsRegister], }); }package.json (2)
Line range hint
39-39: Consider using stable TypeScript versionTypeScript ^5.5.4 is currently in beta/RC. Consider using the latest stable version (5.3.x) to avoid potential issues.
- "typescript": "^5.5.4", + "typescript": "^5.3.3",
Line range hint
38-38: Standardize Node.js versionThe @types/node version (20.14.14) suggests Node.js 20 LTS usage. As noted in the PR objectives, there's uncertainty about the intended Node version. Consider:
- Adding
"engines"field to explicitly specify Node.js version requirements- Adding
.nvmrcfile for version management{ + "engines": { + "node": ">=20.0.0 <21.0.0" + }, "devDependencies": {apps/webapp/app/root.tsx (2)
Line range hint
31-34: Consider removing fixed viewport width.The viewport meta tag has a fixed width of 1024px which might affect responsiveness on smaller devices:
{ name: "viewport", content: "width=1024, initial-scale=1", }Consider using a responsive viewport setting instead:
- content: "width=1024, initial-scale=1", + content: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1",
Line range hint
1-57: Successfully migrated to Remix Vite.The implementation correctly follows Remix Vite patterns:
- Proper asset imports with
?urlsuffix- No barrel imports (addressing the mentioned navigation issues)
- Clean separation of concerns in the root component
For future maintenance, consider documenting these Vite-specific patterns in your contribution guidelines to maintain consistency across the codebase.
apps/webapp/package.json (1)
231-232: Review dotenv implementation and CJS interop strategyNew dependencies added:
dotenv-clianddotenv-expand: The PR mentions concerns about the dotenv solution. Consider documenting the rationale for using these packages over alternatives.vite-plugin-cjs-interop: This is added to resolve import-related issues, but ensure it's only needed for specific CommonJS modules that can't be converted to ESM.Consider:
- Document the dotenv strategy in the README
- Create a migration plan to gradually convert CommonJS modules to ESM to reduce reliance on CJS interop
Also applies to: 254-254
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.v3.$projectParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx (5)
50-52: Add license attribution for dotenv code.Since this code is copied from the dotenv library, please add proper license attribution to comply with open-source licensing requirements.
53-91: Improve type safety and maintainability of the parseEnv function.The function has several areas that could be improved:
- The @ts-ignore comment is masking potential type safety issues
- The complex regex pattern could be extracted for better maintainability
Consider this refactored version:
+ const ENV_LINE_REGEX = /(?:^|^)\s*(?:export\s+)?([\w.-]+)(?:\s*=\s*?|:\s+?)(\s*'(?:\\'|[^'])*'|\s*"(?:\\"|[^"])*"|\s*`(?:\\`|[^`])*`|[^#\r\n]+)?\s*(?:#.*)?(?:$|$)/gm; + + interface EnvVars { + [key: string]: string; + } + - function parseEnv(src: string) { + function parseEnv(src: string): EnvVars { - const LINE = - /(?:^|^)\s*(?:export\s+)?([\w.-]+)(?:\s*=\s*?|:\s+?)(\s*'(?:\\'|[^'])*'|\s*"(?:\\"|[^"])*"|\s*`(?:\\`|[^`])*`|[^#\r\n]+)?\s*(?:#.*)?(?:$|$)/gm; - const obj = {}; + const obj: EnvVars = {}; // Convert buffer to string let lines = src.toString(); // Convert line breaks to same format lines = lines.replace(/\r\n?/gm, "\n"); let match; - while ((match = LINE.exec(lines)) != null) { + while ((match = ENV_LINE_REGEX.exec(lines)) !== null) { const key = match[1]; // Default undefined or null to empty string let value = match[2] || ""; // Remove whitespace value = value.trim(); // Check if double quoted const maybeQuote = value[0]; // Remove surrounding quotes value = value.replace(/^(['"`])([\s\S]*)\1$/gm, "$2"); // Expand newlines if double quoted if (maybeQuote === '"') { value = value.replace(/\\n/g, "\n"); value = value.replace(/\\r/g, "\r"); } - // @ts-ignore obj[key] = value; } return obj; }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 65-65: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Line range hint
409-424: Improve error handling and clarity in handlePaste function.The paste handling could be more robust and clearer:
- Missing error handling for malformed input
- Unclear comment about default paste behavior
Consider this improved version:
const variables = parseEnv(text); const keyValuePairs = Object.entries(variables).map(([key, value]) => ({ key, value })); - //do the default paste + // If no valid environment variables were parsed, let the browser handle the paste if (keyValuePairs.length === 0) return; + try { //prevent default pasting e.preventDefault(); const [firstPair, ...rest] = keyValuePairs; update(index, firstPair); for (const pair of rest) { requestIntent(formRef.current ?? undefined, list.append(variablesFields.name)); } insertAfter(index, rest); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to process pasted environment variables:', error); + // Let the browser handle the paste as fallback + return; + }
Line range hint
466-468: Add security warning for clipboard operations.Consider adding a warning about pasting sensitive data, as clipboard content could be intercepted by other applications.
<div className={cn("flex items-center justify-between gap-4", items.length > 1 && "pr-10")}> <Paragraph variant="extra-small"> - Tip: Paste your .env into this form to populate it. + Tip: Paste your .env into this form to populate it. Be cautious when copying sensitive data to clipboard. </Paragraph>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 65-65: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Based on the code analysis performed, I can now generate the final response:
Add a maximum limit validation for environment variables bulk paste operation
The current implementation allows unlimited environment variables to be pasted, which could lead to performance issues or potential abuse. While there's validation for minimum array size in other parts of the codebase (e.g., schedules), there's no maximum limit validation for environment variables.
- Add a reasonable maximum limit (e.g., 100) to the
variablesschema in the form validation- Implement a check in the paste handler to prevent exceeding this limit
- Consider showing a user-friendly error message when the limit is exceeded
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
409-424: Add validation for maximum number of environment variables.Consider adding a limit to the number of environment variables that can be pasted to prevent potential abuse or performance issues.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any existing limits on environment variables in the codebase rg -A 5 "MAX_ENV_VARS|maxEnvVars|MAX_ENVIRONMENT_VARIABLES" # Check for any validation schemas that might already handle this ast-grep --pattern 'z.array($_, { max: $_ })'Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any validation related to environment variables using broader patterns rg -i "environment.*variable.*validation|env.*var.*validation" -A 5 # Check for any zod schema definitions related to environment variables rg -i "z\..*environment" -A 5 # Look for any array validation in the specific file cat "apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.v3.$projectParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx" # Check for any existing validation in the form handling ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = z.array($_)'Length of output: 11393
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any existing array size limits in the codebase rg -i "z\.array.*max|z\.array.*min" -A 2 # Check for any validation in the specific route file rg "variables.*validation|variables.*limit" "apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.v3.$projectParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx" # Look for any API-level validation for environment variables rg "createEnvironmentVariables|addEnvironmentVariables" -A 5Length of output: 566
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
apps/webapp/app/entry.server.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/root.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.v3.$projectParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx(2 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.callback.tsx(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/eventRepository.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/app/v3/handleWebsockets.server.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/package.json(6 hunks)apps/webapp/postcss.config.js(1 hunks)apps/webapp/remix.config.js(0 hunks)apps/webapp/remix.env.d.ts(0 hunks)apps/webapp/server.js(1 hunks)apps/webapp/server.ts(0 hunks)apps/webapp/server/app.ts(1 hunks)apps/webapp/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)apps/webapp/vite.config.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- apps/webapp/remix.config.js
- apps/webapp/remix.env.d.ts
- apps/webapp/server.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- apps/webapp/app/entry.server.tsx
- apps/webapp/postcss.config.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
apps/webapp/app/routes/_app.orgs.$organizationSlug.projects.v3.$projectParam.environment-variables.new/route.tsx
[error] 65-65: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
apps/webapp/vite.config.ts (4)
16-16: Evaluate the necessity of installGlobals({ nativeFetch: true })
The installGlobals function from @remix-run/node is typically used to polyfill globals like fetch in a Node.js environment. Since Node.js versions 18 and above have native support for fetch, verify if this polyfill is required. If your deployment environment uses Node.js 18 or newer, you might be able to remove this.
Consider removing or commenting out this line if not needed:
-installGlobals({ nativeFetch: true });Ensure that removing this does not break any server-side code relying on fetch.
23-29: Review the use of isSsrBuild for conditional rollupOptions
The isSsrBuild flag is intended for differentiating between SSR and client builds. However, in Vite configuration, you might want to use the ssr build option instead. Ensure that isSsrBuild accurately reflects the build context and that the conditional inclusion of rollupOptions behaves as expected.
Verify that isSsrBuild is correctly determined and that the rollupOptions are applied only during SSR builds.
If needed, adjust the configuration:
-export default defineConfig(({ isSsrBuild }) => ({
+export default defineConfig(({ mode, ssrBuild }) => ({
// ...
- rollupOptions: isSsrBuild
+ rollupOptions: ssrBuildRefer to the Vite SSR Build Options for more details.
76-76: Specify correct path for tsconfigPaths plugin
The tsconfigPaths plugin is configured with projects: ["./tsconfig.json"]. Confirm that the tsconfig.json file is located at this path relative to the vite.config.ts file. If the tsconfig.json is in a different location, update the path accordingly to ensure that TypeScript path aliases are resolved properly.
If the tsconfig.json is in the root directory of apps/webapp, then the path is correct. Otherwise, adjust the path like so:
tsconfigPaths({ projects: [
- "./tsconfig.json"
+ "../../tsconfig.json"
] }),This ensures that the TypeScript paths are correctly interpreted during the build.
69-75:
Ensure correct conditional inclusion of the Remix plugin
The condition !process.env.VITEST is used to exclude the Remix plugin during testing. Verify that this environment variable is set appropriately when running Vitest to prevent unintended behavior.
Make sure that when running tests with Vitest, the VITEST environment variable is defined. If not, the Remix plugin might interfere with testing.
Consider modifying the condition to:
-!process.env.VITEST &&
+process.env.NODE_ENV !== "test" &&This approach checks the NODE_ENV variable, which might be more reliable.
Alternatively, ensure that your test scripts set VITEST environment variable correctly.
apps/webapp/server/app.ts (2)
66-68: Confirm comprehensive error handling for sockets
While you're handling socket errors with socket.on("error", ...), ensure that all potential error events are properly managed to prevent unhandled exceptions.
Review the error handling to confirm that no errors can cause the process to crash.
9-13: Verify support for top-level await in your deployment environment
The use of top-level await in imports requires that your Node.js runtime and TypeScript compiler support ES modules and top-level await. Ensure that your environment is properly configured to handle this feature.
Run the following script to check your TypeScript configuration and Node.js version:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the configuration results more deeply to verify the TypeScript settings specifically for the webapp directory.
Top-level await is properly supported in your environment
The configuration is correctly set up for top-level await:
- Node.js version (22.9.0) well exceeds the minimum requirement
- The webapp's tsconfig.json has
"module": "esnext"and uses module bundler resolution - Package.json is configured with
"type": "module"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that top-level await is supported in your environment.
# Test: Check TypeScript configuration.
# Expected: "module" should be "esnext" and "target" should be "es2022" or higher.
if fd tsconfig.json | xargs -I {} jq '."compilerOptions".module, ."compilerOptions".target' {} ; then
echo "Checked tsconfig.json for correct module and target settings."
else
echo "Ensure that 'module' is set to 'esnext' and 'target' is set to 'es2022' or higher in tsconfig.json."
fi
# Test: Check Node.js version.
# Expected: Node.js version should be 14.8.0 or higher to support top-level await.
node_version=$(node -v | sed 's/v//')
required_version="14.8.0"
if [ "$(printf '%s\n' "$required_version" "$node_version" | sort -V | head -n1)" = "$required_version" ]; then
echo "Node.js version is sufficient for top-level await."
else
echo "Node.js version is too low. Please upgrade to Node.js 14.8.0 or higher."
fi
Length of output: 1135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check TypeScript configuration specifically for the webapp directory
fd tsconfig.json apps/webapp | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; cat {}; echo'
# Also check package.json for type field
fd package.json apps/webapp | xargs -I {} sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; jq ".type" {}; echo'
Length of output: 1983
apps/webapp/server.js (1)
71-73: Review the condition for the health check endpoint
The health check endpoint is registered only if process.env.DASHBOARD_AND_API_DISABLED === "true". This logic might be unintuitive since disabling the dashboard and API also disables the health check. Verify if this is the intended behavior.
Ensure the health check endpoint is available as expected in different configurations.
apps/webapp/app/v3/eventRepository.server.ts (1)
25-25: Verify compatibility of 'EventEmitter' import change
The import of EventEmitter has been changed from "node:stream" to "node:events". While this aligns with the standard Node.js module, ensure that all usages of EventEmitter in your codebase are compatible with this change, especially if the project supports older Node.js versions where EventEmitter may have been exported differently.
You can run the following script to check for other imports of EventEmitter from "node:stream":
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that all imports of EventEmitter in the codebase are consistently using "node:events" and there are no imports from "node:stream". The change aligns with the standard Node.js module location for EventEmitter. Additionally, looking at the package.json files, the project has a minimum Node.js requirement of >=18.20.0 where this module structure is fully supported.
Import change from 'node:stream' to 'node:events' is correct and safe
The change to import EventEmitter from "node:events" is the correct approach as:
- All other EventEmitter imports in the codebase use
"node:events" - This is the standard location for EventEmitter in modern Node.js
- The project's Node.js version requirements (>=18.20.0) fully support this module structure
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find import statements of EventEmitter from 'node:stream'
rg 'import\s+{\s*EventEmitter\s*}\s+from\s+"node:stream"' -t js
Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for EventEmitter imports from both node:stream and node:events
rg "import.*EventEmitter.*from ['\"]node:(stream|events)['\"]"
# Also check for any usage of EventEmitter to understand the context
rg "EventEmitter"
# Check the Node.js version requirements in package.json
fd "package.json" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 64400
apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts (1)
1-6: Verify cookie import updates across the codebase
The cookie has been moved from auth.github.ts to this new server file. Let's verify all imports have been updated correctly.
✅ Verification successful
All cookie imports have been correctly updated
The verification shows that:
- No old imports from
auth.githubremain - Two files correctly import from the new location
auth.github.server:apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.tsapps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.callback.tsx
- The cookie name "redirect-to" is only referenced in the cookie creation, with no stray usages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining imports from the old location and verify new imports
echo "Checking for old imports that need updating..."
rg "import.*redirectCookie.*from.*auth\.github[\"']" --type ts
echo "Verifying new import usage..."
rg "import.*redirectCookie.*from.*auth\.github\.server[\"']" --type ts
echo "Checking for any direct cookie name references that might need updating..."
rg "redirect-to" --type ts
Length of output: 800
apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.callback.tsx (2)
3-3: Verify cookie functionality remains intact.
The code uses redirectCookie for parsing and handling redirect URLs during authentication. Since this is a critical part of the authentication flow, we should verify the cookie functionality.
Let's check the cookie implementation:
Also applies to: 7-9
✅ Verification successful
Cookie functionality is properly implemented and maintained
The cookie implementation is consistent and working as expected across the authentication flow:
- In
auth.github.server.ts: Cookie is properly configured with security settings (httpOnly) and reasonable expiration (1 hour) - In
auth.github.ts: Cookie is correctly set during redirect handling - In
auth.github.callback.tsx: Cookie is properly parsed and used for redirection after authentication
The changes maintain the expected cookie functionality for handling authentication redirects.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the cookie implementation in the server file
# Look for cookie creation/configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'createCookie($$$)'
# Check for any other routes using this cookie to ensure consistent usage
rg -l "redirectCookie" apps/webapp/app/routes/
Length of output: 517
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine how the cookie is used across these files
rg "redirectCookie" apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts -A 5 -B 5
rg "redirectCookie" apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.callback.tsx -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 1363
3-3: LGTM! Verify server file exists.
The import path change to include .server suffix aligns with Remix's convention for server-only code, which is appropriate for cookie handling.
Let's verify the server file exists and exports the required cookie:
✅ Verification successful
Import path change verified successfully
The verification confirms that:
- The file
apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.tsexists - It properly declares and exports
redirectCookieusingcreateCookiewith appropriate security settings (httpOnly, maxAge) - The import path change in the callback route is correct
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the auth.github.server.ts file exists and exports redirectCookie
# Check if the file exists in the same directory
fd -e ts "auth.github.server.ts" apps/webapp/app/routes
# Verify the redirectCookie export
ast-grep --pattern 'export { redirectCookie }'
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the redirectCookie declaration in the server file
ast-grep --pattern 'const redirectCookie = $_'
# Also check if it's imported from somewhere else
rg "redirectCookie.*from" apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts
Length of output: 4118
apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts (1)
4-4: Verify cookie configuration consistency
The redirectCookie has been moved from local definition to a separate server file. Let's ensure the configuration remains consistent.
✅ Verification successful
Cookie configuration is properly maintained after relocation
The redirectCookie has been correctly moved to the server file with the same configuration:
- Name: "redirect-to"
- maxAge: 1 hour (60 * 60 seconds)
- httpOnly: true
The cookie is properly imported and used in the authentication flow for storing the redirect URL during the GitHub OAuth process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check cookie configuration in the server file
# Look for createCookie configuration to verify maxAge and httpOnly settings
rg -A 5 "createCookie.*redirectCookie" "./auth.github.server"
Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the correct path to the auth.github.server file
fd "auth.github.server"
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now let's check the cookie configuration in the correct file
rg -A 5 "createCookie.*redirectCookie" "apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts"
# Also let's check the git history to see the previous configuration
git show HEAD -- apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts | rg -A 5 "createCookie.*redirectCookie"
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the cookie definition
rg -A 5 "redirectCookie" "apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts"
# And let's see the entire content of both files to understand the context better
echo "=== auth.github.server.ts ==="
cat "apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.server.ts"
echo -e "\n=== auth.github.ts ==="
cat "apps/webapp/app/routes/auth.github.ts"
Length of output: 1668
apps/webapp/tsconfig.json (1)
3-3: Verify type definitions after removing remix.env.d.ts
The removal of remix.env.d.ts from includes aligns with the Remix Vite migration, but we should verify that all Remix-specific types are still properly handled.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of vite.config.ts to see if it includes any type definitions that might replace remix.env.d.ts.
Let me check one final thing to verify how the Remix types are being handled in the new setup.
Removal of remix.env.d.ts is safe as types are properly handled through @remix-run packages
The removal of remix.env.d.ts from includes is correct and aligns with the Remix Vite migration. The types are now being handled through:
- Direct imports from
@remix-run/node(as seen in vite.config.ts) - Vite's built-in type definitions through
vite/client - Global type declarations are properly managed through
global.d.tswhich is included in tsconfig.json
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to remix.env.d.ts and verify new type definition setup
# Check for any remaining references to remix.env.d.ts
rg -l "remix\.env\.d\.ts"
# Verify if there's a new type definition file for Remix
fd -e d.ts -e ts -p "remix|vite"
Length of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check vite.config.ts content and search for type-related configurations
cat apps/webapp/vite.config.ts
# Also check if there are any type definitions in node_modules that might be automatically included
rg -l "declare global" --type ts
Length of output: 2804
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Remix-specific type imports and declarations
rg -l "@remix-run.*types?" --type ts
# Also check the content of the global declarations we found
cat apps/webapp/app/services/worker.server.ts
Length of output: 26734
apps/webapp/app/v3/handleWebsockets.server.ts (1)
14-14: Verify singleton behavior with Vite HMR
Since this is part of the Remix Vite upgrade, ensure the WebSocket server singleton properly handles Hot Module Replacement and server reloads.
Let's check for proper cleanup handling in the server code:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the singleton implementation and WebSocket server initialization.
WebSocket singleton implementation is properly handled
The WebSocket server implementation already includes proper cleanup handling:
- The server is initialized in
noServermode, which is compatible with HMR - Connections are tracked in a Map and properly cleaned up when closed
- Each connection has an
onClosehandler that removes it from the tracking Map - The singleton pattern ensures only one WebSocket server instance exists
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's proper cleanup handling for the WebSocket server
# Look for dispose/cleanup patterns in server files
# Search for cleanup patterns in server files
echo "Searching for cleanup handlers..."
rg -l "beforeClose|onDispose|cleanup|teardown" apps/webapp/server
# Check the new server structure for WebSocket initialization
echo "Checking WebSocket initialization in new server structure..."
rg -A 5 "handleWebsockets" apps/webapp/server
Length of output: 825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the singleton implementation and WebSocket server initialization
echo "Checking singleton implementation..."
rg -A 10 "singleton.*wss" apps/webapp
echo "\nChecking WebSocket server initialization..."
rg -A 10 "initalizeWebSocketServer" apps/webapp
echo "\nChecking for any existing cleanup or dispose patterns..."
rg -A 5 "close|dispose|cleanup|destroy" apps/webapp/app/v3/handleWebsockets.server.ts
Length of output: 2932
package.json (1)
61-61: Verify Vite 5.x upgrade compatibility
The upgrade from Vite 4.x to 5.x is a major version bump that may include breaking changes. Please ensure all Vite plugins and configurations are compatible with Vite 5.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Vite configuration files to understand how the plugins are being used and verify compatibility.
Based on the analysis of the Vite configuration files and dependencies, I can now provide a final response:
Vite 5.x upgrade is properly configured and compatible
The upgrade from Vite 4.x to 5.x has been implemented correctly with all necessary supporting changes:
- The Vite configuration in
apps/webapp/vite.config.tsuses compatible plugins:vite-tsconfig-pathsv4.3.2vite-plugin-cjs-interopv2.1.5@remix-run/devv2.15.0 with Vite plugin support
- The configuration includes proper CommonJS interop settings for dependencies
- Node.js polyfills are correctly configured in the resolve.alias section
- The Vite server integration in
server.jsfollows the recommended setup for Remix
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Vite plugins that might need updates
rg '"vite-plugin-|@vitejs/' -A 1 $(fd 'package.json' apps packages integrations)
# Look for Vite config files that might need updates
fd 'vite.config' apps packages integrations
Length of output: 1222
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Vite config contents
cat apps/webapp/vite.config.ts packages/cli-v3/vite.config.ts
# Check if there are any Vite-specific issues or errors in recent commits
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' 'vite' -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 101502
apps/webapp/app/root.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Correct Vite asset import pattern.
The ?url suffix is the correct way to handle CSS imports in Vite, ensuring proper asset handling during build.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other stylesheets:
✅ Verification successful
Inconsistent CSS import patterns detected - update required
The codebase shows inconsistent CSS import patterns:
root.tsxcorrectly uses?urlsuffix for ViterenderMarkdown.server.tsuses direct CSS import without the suffix
Since this is a Vite migration, all client-side CSS imports should use the ?url suffix. However, the import in renderMarkdown.server.ts might be server-side only. Let's verify this:
Tailwind CSS import pattern is correctly implemented
The ?url suffix in root.tsx is correctly applied for client-side CSS. The other CSS import in renderMarkdown.server.ts is part of a server-side module (indicated by .server.ts extension) used for syntax highlighting with Prism.js, which doesn't require the Vite-specific ?url suffix as it's not served directly to the client.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other CSS imports to ensure consistent usage of ?url suffix
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' '\.css(\?url)?' apps/webapp/app
Length of output: 250
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of the CSS import in renderMarkdown.server.ts
rg -B 5 -A 5 "prismjs/plugins/line-numbers/prism-line-numbers.css" apps/webapp/app/services/renderMarkdown.server.ts
Length of output: 549
Line range hint 42-57: Review environment variable exposure to the client.
While the loader implementation is solid, please verify that it's safe to expose these environment variables to the client:
posthogProjectKeyhighlightProjectIdappEnvappOrigin
Let's check how these environment variables are defined and used:
✅ Verification successful
Environment variables are safely exposed to the client
The exposed environment variables are safe to share with the client-side:
POSTHOG_PROJECT_KEYis a public PostHog key (starts withphc_) used for analytics initializationHIGHLIGHT_PROJECT_IDis an optional public key for the Highlight monitoring serviceAPP_ENVandAPP_ORIGINare non-sensitive configuration values needed for client operation
The implementation follows best practices:
- Analytics keys are properly used for their intended client-side initialization
- Sensitive keys (like
AUTH_GITHUB_CLIENT_SECRET,RESEND_API_KEY) are not exposed - Environment variables are validated through a zod schema
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check environment variable definitions and usage
echo "Checking env.server.ts file..."
rg -A 5 "POSTHOG_PROJECT_KEY|HIGHLIGHT_PROJECT_ID|APP_ENV|APP_ORIGIN" apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts
echo "Checking for sensitive usage patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'process.env.$_' apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts
Length of output: 1307
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these variables are used in the frontend
echo "Checking PostHog usage..."
rg -A 5 "posthogProjectKey|POSTHOG_PROJECT_KEY" apps/webapp/app --type ts --type tsx
echo "Checking Highlight usage..."
rg -A 5 "highlightProjectId|HIGHLIGHT_PROJECT_ID" apps/webapp/app --type ts --type tsx
echo "Checking if these are public keys by looking at documentation or comments..."
rg -i "posthog|highlight" apps/webapp/app --type md --type txt
Length of output: 585
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with correct file extensions
echo "Checking PostHog usage..."
rg -A 5 "posthogProjectKey|POSTHOG_PROJECT_KEY" apps/webapp/app
echo "Checking Highlight usage..."
rg -A 5 "highlightProjectId|HIGHLIGHT_PROJECT_ID" apps/webapp/app
echo "Checking entry points for analytics initialization..."
rg -A 10 "posthog|highlight" apps/webapp/app/entry.client.tsx || true
rg -A 10 "posthog|highlight" apps/webapp/app/root.tsx || true
Length of output: 5463
apps/webapp/package.json (2)
6-6: Verify CommonJS compatibility with "type": "module"
The switch to ES modules might affect existing CommonJS dependencies. Ensure all dependencies support ESM, especially internal workspace packages.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that most require() and module.exports usage is in configuration files (tailwind, prettier, jest, eslint) which commonly use CommonJS format and are not affected by the "type": "module" in package.json. There's only one instance in production code (redis-worker) and one comment about CommonJS module in vite.config.ts.
Let's verify if these files are properly handled by checking their package.json configurations:
ES Modules configuration is properly set up and compatible
The module system configuration is correctly handled across the codebase:
- Configuration files (tailwind, prettier, eslint) use the
.jsor.cjsextension, which allows them to remain as CommonJS regardless of package.json settings - The redis-worker package already has
"type": "module"set, ensuring compatibility - The only production
require()usage in redis-worker can be safely converted to an import statement - No other CommonJS dependencies issues were found that would affect the webapp's switch to ES modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential CommonJS compatibility issues
# Look for require() calls that might need to be converted to import
rg "require\(" --type js --type ts
# Look for module.exports that might need to be converted to export
rg "module\.exports" --type js --type ts
Length of output: 1229
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files for these directories
echo "=== redis-worker package.json ==="
cat internal-packages/redis-worker/package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No package.json found"
# Check if there are any .cjs files which are explicitly marked as CommonJS
echo -e "\n=== Looking for .cjs files ==="
fd -e cjs
Length of output: 887
9-11: Review memory allocation and Node.js configuration
A few concerns about the script configurations:
- The
--max-old-space-size=8192(8GB) setting might be excessive for some environments - The
NODE_PATHconfiguration indev:workerseems specific to pnpm - verify if this is still needed with Vite
Consider making the memory limit configurable through an environment variable.
Also applies to: 14-15
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the actual usage context of these configurations to provide a more accurate assessment.
Memory and NODE_PATH configurations are appropriately set
The configurations are justified based on the codebase analysis:
-
The 8GB memory allocation (
--max-old-space-size=8192) is consistently used across production environments (docker, start scripts) and appears intentional for handling the Vite SSR bundling and server operations. -
The
NODE_PATHconfiguration indev:workeris necessary as it's part of a consistent pattern:- Used in Docker environment for production
- Used in e2e testing utilities
- Specifically required for pnpm module resolution in monorepo setup
No changes are needed as these configurations are deliberate architectural decisions rather than oversight.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for memory-related configurations in other files
rg -l "max-old-space-size"
# Check for NODE_PATH usage
rg -l "NODE_PATH"
Length of output: 181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of files with memory configurations
rg "max-old-space-size" -A 2 -B 2
# Check NODE_PATH usage context
rg "NODE_PATH" -A 2 -B 2
# Check server.js content for node path usage
cat apps/webapp/server.js
Length of output: 5891
| expand( | ||
| config({ | ||
| path: "../../.env", | ||
| }) | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid loading environment variables in the Vite config file
Loading environment variables using dotenv and dotenv-expand directly in the Vite configuration can lead to inconsistencies and potential security risks. Vite automatically loads environment variables from .env files into import.meta.env. It's recommended to leverage Vite's built-in mechanism for handling environment variables.
Apply this diff to remove the manual loading and rely on Vite's functionality:
-expand(
- config({
- path: "../../.env",
- })
-);Place your .env file in the root of your project (or as per Vite's conventions) so that Vite can automatically pick it up.
For more information, refer to the Vite Env Variables and Modes documentation.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| expand( | |
| config({ | |
| path: "../../.env", | |
| }) | |
| ); |
| cjsInterop({ | ||
| dependencies: [ | ||
| // The requested module 'cron-parser' is a CommonJS module, which may not support all module.exports as named exports. | ||
| // CommonJS modules can always be imported via the default export, for example using: | ||
| // import pkg from 'cron-parser'; | ||
| // const {parseExpression} = pkg; | ||
| "@prisma/instrumentation", | ||
| "cron-parser", | ||
| "react-use", | ||
| "regression", | ||
| // import * as TooltipPrimitive from "@radix-ui/react-tooltip" | ||
| // Tooltip.displayName = … | ||
| // TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'displayName') | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-tooltip", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-popover", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-dialog", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-label", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-select", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-tabs", | ||
| ], | ||
| }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Some dependencies can be removed from cjsInterop configuration
Based on the npm registry data, several dependencies can be removed from the cjsInterop plugin configuration as they already support ES Modules:
- All
@radix-ui/*packages (they expose ESM via./dist/index.mjs) react-use(exposes ESM viaesm/index.js)
The following should remain in the configuration as they don't show ESM support:
@prisma/instrumentationcron-parserregression
🔗 Analysis chain
Review the dependencies in cjsInterop plugin configuration
The cjsInterop plugin is configured with a list of dependencies for CommonJS interop. Verify if all the listed packages still require this interop. Some packages might have updated to provide ESM exports, making the plugin unnecessary for them.
Run the following script to check if the packages have ESM support:
Based on the results, you might remove packages that no longer need the interop, simplifying your configuration.
Additionally, consider whether you can use named imports or default imports directly without the plugin for some packages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if dependencies support ES Modules
for pkg in "@prisma/instrumentation" "cron-parser" "react-use" "regression" "@radix-ui/react-tooltip" "@radix-ui/react-popover" "@radix-ui/react-dialog" "@radix-ui/react-label" "@radix-ui/react-select" "@radix-ui/react-tabs"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm view "$pkg" module || echo "$pkg does not have 'module' field indicating ESM support."
done
Length of output: 3476
| const server = createServer(app); | ||
|
|
||
| // WebSocket setup | ||
| socketIo?.io.attach(server); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure socketIo is properly initialized before attaching
The optional chaining in socketIo?.io.attach(server); means that if socketIo is undefined, the Socket.IO server will not attach, potentially leading to missing WebSocket functionalities.
Ensure that socketIo is correctly imported and not undefined:
- socketIo?.io.attach(server);
+ if (socketIo) {
+ socketIo.io.attach(server);
+ } else {
+ console.error("socketIo is undefined. Socket.IO server not attached.");
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| socketIo?.io.attach(server); | |
| if (socketIo) { | |
| socketIo.io.attach(server); | |
| } else { | |
| console.error("socketIo is undefined. Socket.IO server not attached."); | |
| } |
|
|
||
| // WebSocket setup | ||
| socketIo?.io.attach(server); | ||
| server.removeAllListeners("upgrade"); // prevent duplicate upgrades from listeners created by io.attach() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Be cautious when removing all 'upgrade' event listeners
Using server.removeAllListeners("upgrade"); may unintentionally remove other 'upgrade' event listeners that are essential for your application or middleware.
Consider removing only the specific listener added by io.attach() to prevent duplicate upgrades without affecting other listeners:
- server.removeAllListeners("upgrade"); // prevent duplicate upgrades from listeners created by io.attach()
+ // Remove the specific 'upgrade' listener added by socket.io to prevent duplicates
+ const upgradeListeners = server.listeners("upgrade");
+ const socketIoListener = upgradeListeners.find(listener => listener.name === 'bound dispatch');
+ if (socketIoListener) {
+ server.removeListener("upgrade", socketIoListener);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server.removeAllListeners("upgrade"); // prevent duplicate upgrades from listeners created by io.attach() | |
| // Remove the specific 'upgrade' listener added by socket.io to prevent duplicates | |
| const upgradeListeners = server.listeners("upgrade"); | |
| const socketIoListener = upgradeListeners.find(listener => listener.name === 'bound dispatch'); | |
| if (socketIoListener) { | |
| server.removeListener("upgrade", socketIoListener); | |
| } |
|
|
||
| // Security and URL cleanup middleware | ||
| app.use((req, res, next) => { | ||
| res.set("Strict-Transport-Security", `max-age=${60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 100}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Set a realistic max-age for the HSTS header
The Strict-Transport-Security header sets max-age to 100 years (60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 100). This duration is excessively long and may not be practical. Consider setting it to 1 year (31536000 seconds) and include includeSubDomains and preload directives for better security.
Apply this diff to adjust the header:
- res.set("Strict-Transport-Security", `max-age=${60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 100}`);
+ res.set("Strict-Transport-Security", "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| res.set("Strict-Transport-Security", `max-age=${60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 100}`); | |
| res.set("Strict-Transport-Security", "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"); |
| const server = app.listen(port, async () => { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Ping the server and send an initial request | ||
| // That will trigger the Remix handler and should guarantee that Remix will break immediately if there's an issue | ||
| await performHealthcheck(port); | ||
| console.log(`✅ server ready: http://localhost:${port} [NODE_ENV: ${MODE}]`); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| console.error("Server started but healthcheck failed:", error); | ||
| process.exit(1); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure server starts after middleware is set up
The server starts listening before asynchronous middleware (like Vite server) is fully initialized. This might cause incoming requests to hit uninitialized middleware. Consider restructuring the code to start the server after all middleware is ready.
Refactor the server initialization:
-const server = app.listen(port, async () => {
- try {
- await performHealthcheck(port);
- console.log(`✅ server ready: http://localhost:${port} [NODE_ENV: ${MODE}]`);
- } catch (error) {
- console.error("Server started but healthcheck failed:", error);
- process.exit(1);
- }
-});
+async function startServer() {
+ try {
+ await performHealthcheck(port);
+ const server = app.listen(port, () => {
+ console.log(`✅ server ready: http://localhost:${port} [NODE_ENV: ${MODE}]`);
+ });
+
+ // Server cleanup
+ server.keepAliveTimeout = 65 * 1000;
+
+ process.on("SIGTERM", () => {
+ server.close((err) => {
+ if (err) {
+ console.error("Error closing express server:", err);
+ } else {
+ console.log("Express server closed gracefully.");
+ }
+ });
+ });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error("Server setup failed:", error);
+ process.exit(1);
+ }
+}
+
+await startServer();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const server = app.listen(port, async () => { | |
| try { | |
| // Ping the server and send an initial request | |
| // That will trigger the Remix handler and should guarantee that Remix will break immediately if there's an issue | |
| await performHealthcheck(port); | |
| console.log(`✅ server ready: http://localhost:${port} [NODE_ENV: ${MODE}]`); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Server started but healthcheck failed:", error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| async function startServer() { | |
| try { | |
| await performHealthcheck(port); | |
| const server = app.listen(port, () => { | |
| console.log(`✅ server ready: http://localhost:${port} [NODE_ENV: ${MODE}]`); | |
| }); | |
| // Server cleanup | |
| server.keepAliveTimeout = 65 * 1000; | |
| process.on("SIGTERM", () => { | |
| server.close((err) => { | |
| if (err) { | |
| console.error("Error closing express server:", err); | |
| } else { | |
| console.log("Express server closed gracefully."); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Server setup failed:", error); | |
| process.exit(1); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| await startServer(); |
| export const redirectCookie = createCookie("redirect-to", { | ||
| maxAge: 60 * 60, // 1 hour | ||
| httpOnly: true, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing cookie security configuration
The basic implementation looks good, but consider adding these security-related cookie attributes:
secure: trueto ensure HTTPS-onlysameSite: 'lax'to prevent CSRF attackspath: '/auth'to restrict cookie scope
export const redirectCookie = createCookie("redirect-to", {
maxAge: 60 * 60, // 1 hour
httpOnly: true,
+ secure: true,
+ sameSite: 'lax',
+ path: '/auth',
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const redirectCookie = createCookie("redirect-to", { | |
| maxAge: 60 * 60, // 1 hour | |
| httpOnly: true, | |
| }); | |
| export const redirectCookie = createCookie("redirect-to", { | |
| maxAge: 60 * 60, // 1 hour | |
| httpOnly: true, | |
| secure: true, | |
| sameSite: 'lax', | |
| path: '/auth', | |
| }); |
| "@remix-run/express": "2.15.0", | ||
| "@remix-run/node": "2.15.0", | ||
| "@remix-run/react": "2.15.0", | ||
| "@remix-run/router": "^1.21.0", | ||
| "@remix-run/serve": "2.15.0", | ||
| "@remix-run/server-runtime": "2.15.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify Node.js version compatibility
The upgrade includes significant version changes:
- Remix packages upgraded to 2.15.0
- Node.js types upgraded to ^20.14.14
- Added Vite v5
However, the engines field still specifies "node": ">=16.0.0". This should be updated to match the Node.js version required by the new dependencies.
"engines": {
- "node": ">=16.0.0"
+ "node": ">=20.0.0"
}Also applies to: 191-193, 209-209, 254-255
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/webapp/vite.config.ts (3)
9-9: Consider implementing Infisical for secure secrets managementThe TODO comment suggests replacing dotenv with Infisical. This would be a good security improvement as Infisical provides better secrets management with encryption and access control.
Would you like assistance in implementing the Infisical integration?
71-73: Document the usage of unstable_optimizeDeps flagWhile this flag addresses the navigation bug mentioned in the PR objectives, its unstable status warrants documentation and monitoring.
Consider adding a comment explaining why this flag is necessary:
future: { + // Enable unstable_optimizeDeps to fix navigation issues with server dependencies + // Track status at: https://github.com/remix-run/remix/issues/[ISSUE_NUMBER] unstable_optimizeDeps: true, },
31-45: Consider adding more commonly used Node.js module aliasesThe current list covers many core modules, but consider adding other commonly used ones to prevent potential resolution issues.
Consider adding these additional aliases:
resolve: { alias: [ // existing aliases... + { find: "util", replacement: "node:util" }, + { find: "events", replacement: "node:events" }, + { find: "fs", replacement: "node:fs" }, + { find: "url", replacement: "node:url" }, ], },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/webapp/vite.config.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/webapp/vite.config.ts (1)
23-28: Verify the server file structure implementation
The conditional inclusion of server/app.ts aligns with the PR's server file splitting strategy, but we should verify that all necessary server integrations are properly moved to this file.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code inspection, I can now provide a final response regarding the server file structure implementation.
Server file structure is properly implemented and follows best practices
The server implementation in apps/webapp/vite.config.ts correctly includes ./server/app.ts for the following reasons:
- The server/app.ts file exists and contains a well-structured Express application setup
- The app exports a single Express instance that handles:
- Registry proxy routes (with feature flag)
- Request context middleware
- Dashboard and API routes (with feature flag)
- WebSocket/Socket.io connections
- The server code is properly modularized and imported by the main server.js file through Vite's SSR module loading
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify server file structure and imports
# Check if server/app.ts exists and contains Express middleware
echo "Checking server file structure..."
fd -e ts -e js "server.(ts|js)" -x cat {}
fd "app.ts" -p "server/" -x cat {}
# Look for any remaining server integrations that might need to be moved
rg -l "express\.(Router|Application)" --type ts --type js
Length of output: 119769
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find server-related files and Express usage
# Look for server/app.ts in the repository
fd -e ts "app.ts" -x cat {}
# Look for Express middleware and router usage
rg -A 5 "express\.(Router|Application)" --type ts --type js
# Look for any server-related files
fd -e ts -e js "server" -x cat {}
Length of output: 103722
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for server-related files in the apps directory
fd -e ts -e js -p "apps/" "server" -x cat {}
# Look for Express middleware and router usage in apps directory
rg -A 5 "express\.(Router|Application)" --type ts --type js -g "apps/**"
# Look for any app.ts files in apps directory
fd -e ts "app.ts" -p "apps/" -x cat {}
Length of output: 3484
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/webapp/server.js (3)
20-25: Consider enhancing the URL cleanup middleware.The URL cleanup middleware correctly handles trailing slashes, but it could be improved by:
- Using
req.originalUrlinstead of manually concatenatingpathandquery- Adding input validation for the path parameter
- const query = req.url.slice(req.path.length); - const safepath = req.path.slice(0, -1).replace(/\/+/g, "/"); - res.redirect(301, safepath + query); + const safepath = req.path.slice(0, -1).replace(/\/+/g, "/"); + res.redirect(301, safepath + req.originalUrl.slice(req.path.length));
77-87: Improve logging configuration precision.The current skip logic for Vite requests could be enhanced:
- Use more precise patterns for file extensions
- Consider adding request timing for performance monitoring
app.use( - morgan("tiny", { + morgan(':method :url :status :response-time ms', { skip: (req) => { - // Vite dev server logs /@fs/ requests and hot reloads for specific files - // Unsure if this is the best way to suppress them from logs - if (req.url.startsWith("/@")) return true; - if (req.url.match(/\.[jt]sx?$/)) return true; + // Skip Vite development server requests + if (req.url.match(/^\/@(fs|vite|react-refresh)/)) return true; + // Skip source map requests + if (req.url.match(/\.(map|[jt]sx?)$/)) return true; return false; }, }) );
101-112: Enhance server cleanup handling.Consider improving the server cleanup logic:
- Add handlers for SIGINT and SIGQUIT signals
- Implement a timeout for graceful shutdown
- Verify the keepAliveTimeout value aligns with upstream proxies
server.keepAliveTimeout = 65 * 1000; +server.headersTimeout = server.keepAliveTimeout + 1000; + +const signals = ['SIGTERM', 'SIGINT', 'SIGQUIT']; +const shutdown = async (signal) => { + console.log(`Received ${signal}, starting graceful shutdown...`); + const shutdownTimeout = setTimeout(() => { + console.error('Shutdown timed out, forcing exit'); + process.exit(1); + }, 10000); -process.on("SIGTERM", () => { server.close((err) => { + clearTimeout(shutdownTimeout); if (err) { console.error("Error closing express server:", err); + process.exit(1); } else { console.log("Express server closed gracefully."); + process.exit(0); } }); -}); +}; + +signals.forEach(signal => { + process.on(signal, () => shutdown(signal)); +});
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/webapp/server.js(1 hunks)apps/webapp/vite.config.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/webapp/vite.config.ts
| app.use("/assets", express.static("build/client/assets", { immutable: true, maxAge: "1y" })); | ||
| app.use(express.static("build/client", { maxAge: "1h" })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add security headers for static file serving.
Consider adding security headers for static file serving to prevent potential security issues.
- app.use("/assets", express.static("build/client/assets", { immutable: true, maxAge: "1y" }));
- app.use(express.static("build/client", { maxAge: "1h" }));
+ app.use("/assets", express.static("build/client/assets", {
+ immutable: true,
+ maxAge: "1y",
+ setHeaders: (res) => {
+ res.set('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff');
+ res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-transform');
+ }
+ }));
+ app.use(express.static("build/client", {
+ maxAge: "1h",
+ setHeaders: (res) => {
+ res.set('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff');
+ }
+ }));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.use("/assets", express.static("build/client/assets", { immutable: true, maxAge: "1y" })); | |
| app.use(express.static("build/client", { maxAge: "1h" })); | |
| app.use("/assets", express.static("build/client/assets", { | |
| immutable: true, | |
| maxAge: "1y", | |
| setHeaders: (res) => { | |
| res.set('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff'); | |
| res.set('Cache-Control', 'no-transform'); | |
| } | |
| })); | |
| app.use(express.static("build/client", { | |
| maxAge: "1h", | |
| setHeaders: (res) => { | |
| res.set('X-Content-Type-Options', 'nosniff'); | |
| } | |
| })); |
| app.use(async (req, res, next) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| /** @type {import("./server/app.ts")} */ | ||
| const source = await viteServer.ssrLoadModule("./server/app.ts"); | ||
|
|
||
| return source.app(req, res, next); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| if (error instanceof Error) { | ||
| viteServer.ssrFixStacktrace(error); | ||
| } | ||
| next(error); | ||
| } | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in Vite middleware.
The current error handling could be improved by:
- Adding specific error types and handling
- Logging the error details before passing to next
app.use(async (req, res, next) => {
try {
/** @type {import("./server/app.ts")} */
const source = await viteServer.ssrLoadModule("./server/app.ts");
return source.app(req, res, next);
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof Error) {
viteServer.ssrFixStacktrace(error);
+ console.error('Vite SSR error:', error);
+ if (error.code === 'ENOENT') {
+ return res.status(404).send('Not found');
+ }
}
next(error);
}
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| app.use(async (req, res, next) => { | |
| try { | |
| /** @type {import("./server/app.ts")} */ | |
| const source = await viteServer.ssrLoadModule("./server/app.ts"); | |
| return source.app(req, res, next); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| viteServer.ssrFixStacktrace(error); | |
| } | |
| next(error); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| app.use(async (req, res, next) => { | |
| try { | |
| /** @type {import("./server/app.ts")} */ | |
| const source = await viteServer.ssrLoadModule("./server/app.ts"); | |
| return source.app(req, res, next); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| viteServer.ssrFixStacktrace(error); | |
| console.error('Vite SSR error:', error); | |
| if (error.code === 'ENOENT') { | |
| return res.status(404).send('Not found'); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| next(error); | |
| } | |
| }); |
| async function performHealthcheck(port, retries = 5, delay = 1000) { | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < retries; i++) { | ||
| try { | ||
| const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:${port}/`); | ||
|
|
||
| if (!res.ok) { | ||
| throw new Error(`Healthcheck failed with status ${res.status}`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return res.text(); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| if (i === retries - 1) throw error; | ||
| await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, delay)); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout and improve error handling in health check.
The health check implementation could be enhanced with:
- Request timeout to prevent hanging
- More specific error handling
- Exponential backoff for retries
-async function performHealthcheck(port, retries = 5, delay = 1000) {
+async function performHealthcheck(port, retries = 5, initialDelay = 1000) {
for (let i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
try {
- const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:${port}/`);
+ const controller = new AbortController();
+ const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000);
+
+ const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:${port}/`, {
+ signal: controller.signal
+ });
+ clearTimeout(timeout);
if (!res.ok) {
throw new Error(`Healthcheck failed with status ${res.status}`);
}
return res.text();
} catch (error) {
+ if (error.name === 'AbortError') {
+ console.warn(`Healthcheck attempt ${i + 1} timed out`);
+ } else {
+ console.warn(`Healthcheck attempt ${i + 1} failed:`, error.message);
+ }
+
if (i === retries - 1) throw error;
- await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
+
+ // Exponential backoff with jitter
+ const backoff = initialDelay * Math.pow(2, i) * (0.9 + Math.random() * 0.2);
+ await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, backoff));
}
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async function performHealthcheck(port, retries = 5, delay = 1000) { | |
| for (let i = 0; i < retries; i++) { | |
| try { | |
| const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:${port}/`); | |
| if (!res.ok) { | |
| throw new Error(`Healthcheck failed with status ${res.status}`); | |
| } | |
| return res.text(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (i === retries - 1) throw error; | |
| await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, delay)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| async function performHealthcheck(port, retries = 5, initialDelay = 1000) { | |
| for (let i = 0; i < retries; i++) { | |
| try { | |
| const controller = new AbortController(); | |
| const timeout = setTimeout(() => controller.abort(), 5000); | |
| const res = await fetch(`http://localhost:${port}/`, { | |
| signal: controller.signal | |
| }); | |
| clearTimeout(timeout); | |
| if (!res.ok) { | |
| throw new Error(`Healthcheck failed with status ${res.status}`); | |
| } | |
| return res.text(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| if (error.name === 'AbortError') { | |
| console.warn(`Healthcheck attempt ${i + 1} timed out`); | |
| } else { | |
| console.warn(`Healthcheck attempt ${i + 1} failed:`, error.message); | |
| } | |
| if (i === retries - 1) throw error; | |
| // Exponential backoff with jitter | |
| const backoff = initialDelay * Math.pow(2, i) * (0.9 + Math.random() * 0.2); | |
| await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, backoff)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
Hey, revisiting this now that the ecosystem has improved a bunch
vite-plugin-cjs-interopsolves a bunch of the changes to package imports like switching to default exports and vice versa that were required before. I couldn't get this working last time, but was possibly just blocked by unrelated bugs that caused me to write this solution offWhat we're left with is a much nicer and much more promising PR
Outstanding concerns
✅ Checklist
Testing
[Describe the steps you took to test this change]
Changelog
[Short description of what has changed]
Screenshots
[Screenshots]
💯
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Configuration Updates