more: split util-linux and POSIX implementations #12171
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
new command
|
Hello! I've noticed something unusual when checking this PR:
Is this intended? If so, just ignore this comment. Otherwise, please double-check the commits. |
gutjuri
reviewed
Jan 31, 2024
Co-authored-by: Juri Dispan <[email protected]>
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
1 similar comment
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
sebastiaanspeck
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2024
kbdharun
approved these changes
Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For #9612 and #11827.
common,linux,osx,windows,sunos,android, etc.I don't think BSD platforms and osx need a platform-specific page, as there are many examples already.
Unfortunately, util-linux options are quite incompatible with POSIX, as well as some options on NetBSD and FreeBSD (and thus macOS), given that
lessandmoreshare the same code on them. OpenBSD, as expected, fully follows POSIX, with the exception of the skip forward functionality, which is not currently implemented.