-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MdeModulePkg/DxeIpmiLibIpmiProtocol: Add depex #6538
Open
nhivp
wants to merge
1
commit into
tianocore:master
Choose a base branch
from
nhivp:fix-dxe-IpmiLib-depex
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is made an unconditional dependency, then the lookup of the protocol should be done in a CONSTRUCTOR and IpmiSubmitCommand() can be simplified to assume mIpmiProtocol is always valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @mdkinney, thanks for your reviewing.
The
DxeIpmiLibIpmiProtocol
always consumes the gIpmiProtocolGuid protocol, and declaring it in the[Depex]
section ensures that the library consumers execute only after the protocol is available. Without this, there is no guarantee of proper driver execution order.Regarding your suggestion to initialize
mIpmiProtocol
in a LIBRARY_CONSTRUCTOR, I agree this approach would simplify IpmiSubmitCommand() by removing the need for runtime protocol lookup. However, the current design expects the protocol to be available at the time of library use, and if it is not, calls to IpmiSubmitCommand() will fail as designed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you add to [Depex], then the protocol is guaranteed to be present when the entry point of this module is executed and CONSTRUCTOR services are executed. So looking up time of use is not required if it is added to [Depex]. If it is not added to [Depex], then the protocol will be checked on each use and can fail if the protocol is not present yet. If platforms depend on lazy evaluation of this protocol being present, then this change can not be accepted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @mdkinney for the clarification.
The check for
mIpmiProtocol == NULL
in theIpmiSubmitCommand ()
function is intended to perform a one-time lookup of thegIpmiProtocolGuid
protocol. Once the protocol is located,mIpmiProtocol
is cached for subsequent use, ensuring minimal overhead after the initial lookup.The primary intent of this change is to ensure that the
DxeIpmiLibIpmiProtocol
library consumes thegIpmiProtocolGuid
protocol reliably. Adding the protocol to the[Depex]
section consistently enforces proper driver execution order and guarantees the protocol is available when the consumer's DXE Entry Point is executed.I'm unsure if I understand correctly. Adding the
gIpmiProtocolGuid
protocol to the[Depex]
section of individual consumer drivers could address the issue. However, this change aims to simplify dependency management by moving the responsibility to theDxeIpmiLibIpmiProtocol
library itself.By declaring the protocol in the library’s
[Depex]
section:Existing and future consumers of the library are relieved of the need to explicitly handle the
gIpmiProtocolGuid
dependency.The library fully abstracts the protocol dependency, adhering to the principle of encapsulation and ensuring a cleaner, more maintainable design.
Additionally, this change ensures consistent behavior across all consumers without requiring them to have knowledge of the dependent protocol.