Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Line 19 in 8e39014

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 8e39014

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 8e39014

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 8e39014

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 8e39014

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 8e39014

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 8e39014

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 8e39014

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 8e39014

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 8e39014

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 8e39014

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 8e39014

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 8e39014

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 8e39014

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 8e39014

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 8e39014

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 8e39014

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 8e39014

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 8e39014

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 8e39014

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 8e39014

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 8e39014

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 8e39014

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 8e39014

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 8e39014

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 8e39014

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 8e39014

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 8e39014

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 8e39014

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 8e39014

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 8e39014

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 8e39014

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 8e39014

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 8e39014

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 8e39014

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 8e39014

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 8e39014

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 8e39014

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 8e39014

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 8e39014

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 8e39014

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 8e39014

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 8e39014

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 8e39014

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 8e39014

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 8e39014

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 8e39014

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 8e39014

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-28T17:05:44Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in c9e7963

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in c9e7963

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in c9e7963

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in c9e7963

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in c9e7963

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in c9e7963

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in c9e7963

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in c9e7963

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in c9e7963

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in c9e7963

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c9e7963

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in c9e7963

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in c9e7963

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in c9e7963

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in c9e7963

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in c9e7963

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c9e7963

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in c9e7963

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in c9e7963

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in c9e7963

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in c9e7963

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c9e7963

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in c9e7963

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in c9e7963

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c9e7963

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in c9e7963

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in c9e7963

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c9e7963

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in c9e7963

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in c9e7963

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in c9e7963

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in c9e7963

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c9e7963

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in c9e7963

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c9e7963

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in c9e7963

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c9e7963

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in c9e7963

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in c9e7963

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in c9e7963

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c9e7963

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c9e7963

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c9e7963

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in c9e7963

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in c9e7963

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c9e7963

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in c9e7963

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in c9e7963

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-29T01:43:40Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in cbfb6a8

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in cbfb6a8

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in cbfb6a8

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in cbfb6a8

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in cbfb6a8

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in cbfb6a8

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in cbfb6a8

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in cbfb6a8

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in cbfb6a8

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in cbfb6a8

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in cbfb6a8

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in cbfb6a8

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in cbfb6a8

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in cbfb6a8

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cbfb6a8

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in cbfb6a8

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in cbfb6a8

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in cbfb6a8

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in cbfb6a8

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cbfb6a8

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in cbfb6a8

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in cbfb6a8

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cbfb6a8

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in cbfb6a8

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cbfb6a8

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cbfb6a8

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in cbfb6a8

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in cbfb6a8

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cbfb6a8

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in cbfb6a8

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in cbfb6a8

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-06-30T04:23:10Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in acfe932

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in acfe932

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in acfe932

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in acfe932

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in acfe932

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in acfe932

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in acfe932

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in acfe932

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in acfe932

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in acfe932

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in acfe932

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in acfe932

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in acfe932

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in acfe932

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in acfe932

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in acfe932

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in acfe932

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in acfe932

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in acfe932

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in acfe932

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in acfe932

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in acfe932

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in acfe932

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in acfe932

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in acfe932

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in acfe932

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in acfe932

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in acfe932

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in acfe932

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in acfe932

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in acfe932

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in acfe932

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in acfe932

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in acfe932

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in acfe932

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in acfe932

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in acfe932

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in acfe932

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in acfe932

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in acfe932

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in acfe932

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in acfe932

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in acfe932

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in acfe932

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in acfe932

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in acfe932

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in acfe932

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in acfe932

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in acfe932

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in acfe932

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in acfe932

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in acfe932

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in acfe932

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-01T01:05:55Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 38ccffa

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 38ccffa

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 38ccffa

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 38ccffa

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 38ccffa

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 38ccffa

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 38ccffa

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 38ccffa

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 38ccffa

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 38ccffa

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 38ccffa

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 38ccffa

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 38ccffa

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 38ccffa

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 38ccffa

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 38ccffa

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 38ccffa

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 38ccffa

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 38ccffa

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 38ccffa

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 38ccffa

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 38ccffa

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 38ccffa

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 38ccffa

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 38ccffa

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 38ccffa

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 38ccffa

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 38ccffa

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 38ccffa

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 38ccffa

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 38ccffa

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 38ccffa

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 38ccffa

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 38ccffa

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 38ccffa

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 38ccffa

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 38ccffa

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 38ccffa

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 38ccffa

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 38ccffa

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 38ccffa

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 38ccffa

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 38ccffa

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 38ccffa

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-01T22:21:14Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6159626

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 6159626

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 6159626

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 6159626

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 6159626

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 6159626

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 6159626

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 6159626

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 6159626

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6159626

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 6159626

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 6159626

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6159626

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 6159626

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 6159626

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6159626

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6159626

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 6159626

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6159626

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6159626

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 6159626

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 6159626

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 6159626

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 6159626

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6159626

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6159626

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6159626

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6159626

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6159626

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6159626

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6159626

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6159626

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6159626

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 6159626

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 6159626

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 6159626

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6159626

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 6159626

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 6159626

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6159626

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 6159626

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6159626

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6159626

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6159626

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6159626

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6159626

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6159626

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6159626

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6159626

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6159626

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6159626

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6159626

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 6159626

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-02T01:12:47Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 1954472

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 1954472

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 1954472

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 1954472

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 1954472

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 1954472

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 1954472

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 1954472

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 1954472

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 1954472

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 1954472

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 1954472

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1954472

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 1954472

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 1954472

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 1954472

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 1954472

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 1954472

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 1954472

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1954472

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 1954472

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 1954472

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 1954472

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 1954472

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1954472

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 1954472

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 1954472

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1954472

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 1954472

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 1954472

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1954472

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 1954472

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 1954472

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 1954472

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 1954472

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 1954472

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1954472

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 1954472

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 1954472

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1954472

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 1954472

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1954472

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 1954472

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 1954472

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 1954472

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1954472

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1954472

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1954472

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 1954472

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 1954472

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1954472

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 1954472

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 1954472

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-07T01:23:49Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b32deef

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in b32deef

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in b32deef

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in b32deef

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in b32deef

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in b32deef

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in b32deef

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in b32deef

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in b32deef

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b32deef

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in b32deef

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in b32deef

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b32deef

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in b32deef

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in b32deef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b32deef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b32deef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in b32deef

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b32deef

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b32deef

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in b32deef

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in b32deef

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in b32deef

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in b32deef

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b32deef

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b32deef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b32deef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b32deef

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b32deef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b32deef

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b32deef

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b32deef

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b32deef

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in b32deef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in b32deef

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in b32deef

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b32deef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in b32deef

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in b32deef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b32deef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in b32deef

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b32deef

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b32deef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b32deef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b32deef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b32deef

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b32deef

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b32deef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b32deef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b32deef

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b32deef

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b32deef

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in b32deef

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-07T01:52:56Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in f73af28

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in f73af28

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in f73af28

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in f73af28

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in f73af28

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in f73af28

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in f73af28

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in f73af28

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in f73af28

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in f73af28

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in f73af28

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in f73af28

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in f73af28

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in f73af28

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in f73af28

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in f73af28

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in f73af28

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in f73af28

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in f73af28

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in f73af28

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in f73af28

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in f73af28

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in f73af28

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in f73af28

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in f73af28

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in f73af28

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in f73af28

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in f73af28

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in f73af28

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in f73af28

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in f73af28

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in f73af28

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in f73af28

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in f73af28

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in f73af28

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in f73af28

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in f73af28

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in f73af28

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in f73af28

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in f73af28

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in f73af28

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in f73af28

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in f73af28

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in f73af28

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in f73af28

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in f73af28

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in f73af28

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in f73af28

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in f73af28

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in f73af28

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in f73af28

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in f73af28

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in f73af28

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-07T22:35:33Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 5e4cd8e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 5e4cd8e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 5e4cd8e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 5e4cd8e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 5e4cd8e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 5e4cd8e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 5e4cd8e

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 5e4cd8e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 5e4cd8e

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 5e4cd8e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 5e4cd8e

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 5e4cd8e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 5e4cd8e

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 5e4cd8e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 5e4cd8e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 5e4cd8e

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 5e4cd8e

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 5e4cd8e

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 5e4cd8e

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 5e4cd8e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 5e4cd8e

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 5e4cd8e

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 5e4cd8e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 5e4cd8e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 5e4cd8e

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 5e4cd8e

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 5e4cd8e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 5e4cd8e

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 5e4cd8e

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 5e4cd8e

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 5e4cd8e

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-07T23:48:02Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 0d7e0ef

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 0d7e0ef

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 0d7e0ef

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 0d7e0ef

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 0d7e0ef

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 0d7e0ef

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 0d7e0ef

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 0d7e0ef

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 0d7e0ef

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 0d7e0ef

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 0d7e0ef

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 0d7e0ef

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 0d7e0ef

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 0d7e0ef

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 0d7e0ef

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 0d7e0ef

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 0d7e0ef

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 0d7e0ef

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 0d7e0ef

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 0d7e0ef

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 0d7e0ef

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 0d7e0ef

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 0d7e0ef

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 0d7e0ef

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 0d7e0ef

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 0d7e0ef

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 0d7e0ef

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 0d7e0ef

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 0d7e0ef

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 0d7e0ef

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 0d7e0ef

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-08T21:08:06Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 926106c

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 926106c

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 926106c

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 926106c

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 926106c

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 926106c

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 926106c

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 926106c

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 926106c

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 926106c

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 926106c

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 926106c

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 926106c

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 926106c

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 926106c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 926106c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 926106c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 926106c

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 926106c

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 926106c

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 926106c

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 926106c

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 926106c

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 926106c

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 926106c

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 926106c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 926106c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 926106c

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 926106c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 926106c

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 926106c

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 926106c

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 926106c

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 926106c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 926106c

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 926106c

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 926106c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 926106c

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 926106c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 926106c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 926106c

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 926106c

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 926106c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 926106c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 926106c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 926106c

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 926106c

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 926106c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 926106c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 926106c

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 926106c

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 926106c

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 926106c

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-10T13:50:25Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in addfefb

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in addfefb

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in addfefb

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in addfefb

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in addfefb

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in addfefb

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in addfefb

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in addfefb

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in addfefb

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in addfefb

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in addfefb

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in addfefb

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in addfefb

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in addfefb

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in addfefb

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in addfefb

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in addfefb

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in addfefb

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in addfefb

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in addfefb

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in addfefb

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in addfefb

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in addfefb

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in addfefb

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in addfefb

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in addfefb

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in addfefb

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in addfefb

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in addfefb

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in addfefb

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in addfefb

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in addfefb

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in addfefb

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in addfefb

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in addfefb

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in addfefb

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in addfefb

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in addfefb

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in addfefb

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in addfefb

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in addfefb

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in addfefb

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in addfefb

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in addfefb

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in addfefb

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in addfefb

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in addfefb

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in addfefb

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in addfefb

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in addfefb

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in addfefb

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in addfefb

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in addfefb

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-13T23:12:04Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b183796

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in b183796

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in b183796

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in b183796

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in b183796

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in b183796

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in b183796

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in b183796

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in b183796

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b183796

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in b183796

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in b183796

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b183796

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in b183796

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in b183796

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b183796

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b183796

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in b183796

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b183796

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b183796

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in b183796

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in b183796

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in b183796

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in b183796

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b183796

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b183796

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b183796

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b183796

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b183796

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b183796

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b183796

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b183796

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b183796

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in b183796

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in b183796

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in b183796

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b183796

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in b183796

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in b183796

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b183796

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in b183796

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b183796

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b183796

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b183796

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b183796

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b183796

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b183796

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b183796

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b183796

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b183796

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b183796

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b183796

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in b183796

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-14T03:54:13Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 1d40427

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 1d40427

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 1d40427

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 1d40427

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 1d40427

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 1d40427

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 1d40427

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 1d40427

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 1d40427

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 1d40427

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 1d40427

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 1d40427

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 1d40427

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 1d40427

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 1d40427

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 1d40427

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1d40427

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 1d40427

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 1d40427

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 1d40427

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 1d40427

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1d40427

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 1d40427

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 1d40427

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1d40427

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 1d40427

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 1d40427

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1d40427

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 1d40427

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 1d40427

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 1d40427

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 1d40427

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 1d40427

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 1d40427

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 1d40427

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 1d40427

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 1d40427

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 1d40427

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 1d40427

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 1d40427

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 1d40427

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 1d40427

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 1d40427

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 1d40427

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 1d40427

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 1d40427

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 1d40427

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 1d40427

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-16T13:02:33Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 3928b7e

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 3928b7e

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 3928b7e

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 3928b7e

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 3928b7e

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 3928b7e

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 3928b7e

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 3928b7e

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 3928b7e

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 3928b7e

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3928b7e

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 3928b7e

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 3928b7e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3928b7e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3928b7e

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 3928b7e

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3928b7e

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 3928b7e

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 3928b7e

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 3928b7e

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 3928b7e

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3928b7e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3928b7e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3928b7e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3928b7e

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3928b7e

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3928b7e

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 3928b7e

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 3928b7e

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 3928b7e

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3928b7e

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 3928b7e

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 3928b7e

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3928b7e

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3928b7e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3928b7e

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3928b7e

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3928b7e

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3928b7e

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3928b7e

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3928b7e

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3928b7e

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3928b7e

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 3928b7e

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-16T20:39:08Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 3200a50

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 3200a50

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 3200a50

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 3200a50

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 3200a50

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 3200a50

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 3200a50

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 3200a50

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 3200a50

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 3200a50

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 3200a50

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 3200a50

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 3200a50

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3200a50

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 3200a50

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 3200a50

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3200a50

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 3200a50

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 3200a50

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 3200a50

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 3200a50

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3200a50

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3200a50

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3200a50

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3200a50

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3200a50

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3200a50

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3200a50

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3200a50

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 3200a50

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 3200a50

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 3200a50

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 3200a50

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 3200a50

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 3200a50

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 3200a50

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 3200a50

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 3200a50

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 3200a50

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 3200a50

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 3200a50

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 3200a50

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 3200a50

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 3200a50

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 3200a50

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 3200a50

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 3200a50

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 3200a50

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-18T16:09:30Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in cfd7357

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in cfd7357

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in cfd7357

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in cfd7357

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in cfd7357

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in cfd7357

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in cfd7357

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in cfd7357

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in cfd7357

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in cfd7357

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in cfd7357

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in cfd7357

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in cfd7357

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in cfd7357

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in cfd7357

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in cfd7357

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cfd7357

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in cfd7357

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in cfd7357

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in cfd7357

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in cfd7357

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cfd7357

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in cfd7357

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in cfd7357

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cfd7357

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in cfd7357

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in cfd7357

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cfd7357

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in cfd7357

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in cfd7357

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in cfd7357

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in cfd7357

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in cfd7357

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in cfd7357

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in cfd7357

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in cfd7357

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in cfd7357

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in cfd7357

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in cfd7357

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in cfd7357

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in cfd7357

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in cfd7357

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in cfd7357

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in cfd7357

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in cfd7357

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in cfd7357

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in cfd7357

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in cfd7357

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-21T01:28:15Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in b65c3e9

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in b65c3e9

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in b65c3e9

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in b65c3e9

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in b65c3e9

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in b65c3e9

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in b65c3e9

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in b65c3e9

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in b65c3e9

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in b65c3e9

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in b65c3e9

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in b65c3e9

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in b65c3e9

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b65c3e9

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in b65c3e9

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in b65c3e9

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b65c3e9

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in b65c3e9

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in b65c3e9

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in b65c3e9

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in b65c3e9

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b65c3e9

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b65c3e9

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b65c3e9

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b65c3e9

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b65c3e9

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b65c3e9

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in b65c3e9

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in b65c3e9

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in b65c3e9

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in b65c3e9

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in b65c3e9

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in b65c3e9

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in b65c3e9

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in b65c3e9

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in b65c3e9

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in b65c3e9

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in b65c3e9

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in b65c3e9

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in b65c3e9

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in b65c3e9

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in b65c3e9

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in b65c3e9

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in b65c3e9

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-23T19:02:17Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in bf8ee2c

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in bf8ee2c

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in bf8ee2c

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in bf8ee2c

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in bf8ee2c

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in bf8ee2c

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in bf8ee2c

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in bf8ee2c

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in bf8ee2c

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in bf8ee2c

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in bf8ee2c

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in bf8ee2c

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in bf8ee2c

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in bf8ee2c

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in bf8ee2c

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in bf8ee2c

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in bf8ee2c

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in bf8ee2c

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in bf8ee2c

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in bf8ee2c

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in bf8ee2c

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in bf8ee2c

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in bf8ee2c

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in bf8ee2c

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in bf8ee2c

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in bf8ee2c

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in bf8ee2c

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in bf8ee2c

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in bf8ee2c

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in bf8ee2c

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in bf8ee2c

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-23T23:35:31Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in d0a0510

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in d0a0510

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in d0a0510

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in d0a0510

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in d0a0510

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in d0a0510

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in d0a0510

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in d0a0510

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in d0a0510

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in d0a0510

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in d0a0510

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in d0a0510

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in d0a0510

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d0a0510

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in d0a0510

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in d0a0510

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d0a0510

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in d0a0510

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in d0a0510

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in d0a0510

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in d0a0510

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d0a0510

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d0a0510

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d0a0510

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d0a0510

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d0a0510

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d0a0510

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d0a0510

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d0a0510

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in d0a0510

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in d0a0510

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in d0a0510

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in d0a0510

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in d0a0510

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in d0a0510

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in d0a0510

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in d0a0510

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in d0a0510

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in d0a0510

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in d0a0510

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in d0a0510

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in d0a0510

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in d0a0510

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in d0a0510

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in d0a0510

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in d0a0510

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in d0a0510

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in d0a0510

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-24T01:01:18Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6ca09f7

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 6ca09f7

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 6ca09f7

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 6ca09f7

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 6ca09f7

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 6ca09f7

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 6ca09f7

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 6ca09f7

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 6ca09f7

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 6ca09f7

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 6ca09f7

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 6ca09f7

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 6ca09f7

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 6ca09f7

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ca09f7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6ca09f7

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6ca09f7

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 6ca09f7

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 6ca09f7

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ca09f7

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 6ca09f7

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 6ca09f7

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ca09f7

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6ca09f7

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ca09f7

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ca09f7

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6ca09f7

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6ca09f7

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ca09f7

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6ca09f7

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 6ca09f7

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Bumps [@actions/github](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/tree/HEAD/packages/github) from 2.2.0 to 4.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/master/packages/github/RELEASES.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/commits/HEAD/packages/github) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <[email protected]>

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-24T19:34:10Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 6ea5ac1

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 6ea5ac1

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 6ea5ac1

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 6ea5ac1

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 6ea5ac1

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 6ea5ac1

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 6ea5ac1

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 6ea5ac1

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 6ea5ac1

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 6ea5ac1

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 6ea5ac1

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 6ea5ac1

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 6ea5ac1

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 6ea5ac1

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ea5ac1

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6ea5ac1

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 6ea5ac1

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 6ea5ac1

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 6ea5ac1

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 6ea5ac1

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 6ea5ac1

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 6ea5ac1

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 6ea5ac1

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 6ea5ac1

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 6ea5ac1

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 6ea5ac1

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 6ea5ac1

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 6ea5ac1

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 6ea5ac1

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 6ea5ac1

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 6ea5ac1

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-24T23:56:28Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in c56a3ba

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in c56a3ba

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in c56a3ba

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in c56a3ba

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in c56a3ba

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in c56a3ba

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in c56a3ba

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in c56a3ba

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in c56a3ba

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in c56a3ba

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in c56a3ba

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in c56a3ba

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in c56a3ba

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in c56a3ba

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in c56a3ba

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in c56a3ba

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c56a3ba

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in c56a3ba

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in c56a3ba

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in c56a3ba

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in c56a3ba

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c56a3ba

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in c56a3ba

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in c56a3ba

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c56a3ba

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in c56a3ba

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in c56a3ba

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in c56a3ba

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in c56a3ba

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in c56a3ba

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in c56a3ba

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in c56a3ba

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in c56a3ba

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in c56a3ba

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in c56a3ba

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in c56a3ba

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in c56a3ba

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in c56a3ba

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in c56a3ba

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in c56a3ba

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in c56a3ba

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in c56a3ba

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in c56a3ba

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in c56a3ba

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-25T00:18:02Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 72efcc3

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 72efcc3

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 72efcc3

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 72efcc3

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 72efcc3

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 72efcc3

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 72efcc3

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 72efcc3

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 72efcc3

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 72efcc3

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 72efcc3

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 72efcc3

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 72efcc3

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 72efcc3

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 72efcc3

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 72efcc3

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 72efcc3

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 72efcc3

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 72efcc3

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 72efcc3

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 72efcc3

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 72efcc3

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 72efcc3

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 The readable-readme project is an automated `Markdown` linting process written in `Typescript`. It can be used in any automated system like travis CI, circle CI, but preferrably GitHub Actions as it will work out-of-box with zero configuration. 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

tianhaoz95 · 2020-07-25T00:27:15Z

Title: Report for refs/pull/478/merge

Thanks for Using Readable Readme

This report is auto-generated by readable-readme to help your team improve the quality of READMEs.

Report for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Line 19 in 72efcc3

* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism

Suggestion: "Gracefully" can weaken meaning

Line 31 in 72efcc3

* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a

Suggestion: "be considered" may be passive voice

Line 37 in 72efcc3

behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in

Suggestion: "are expected" may be passive voice

Lines 57 to 58 in 72efcc3

	Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
	reported by contacting the project team at [email protected]. All

Suggestion: "be reported" may be passive voice

Line 59 in 72efcc3

complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that

Suggestion: "be reviewed" may be passive voice

Line 60 in 72efcc3

is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is

Suggestion: "is deemed" may be passive voice

Lines 60 to 61 in 72efcc3

 is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is 

 obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.

Suggestion: "is obligated" may be passive voice

Line 62 in 72efcc3

Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Suggestion: "be posted" may be passive voice

Line 70 in 72efcc3

 This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4, 

Suggestion: "is adapted" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for CONTRIBUTING.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

Just submit a PR and I will review and leave comments as soon as possible.

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for README.md

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Too often we find a great project, but give up 5 minutes later only because we can't get enough information from its `README`. I wouldn't blame the developers for the poor `README` readability because, first, unlike the code, there has never been a focus on `README` readability, and second, there is no good tools to enforce `README` readability. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 25 in 72efcc3

> note: the token is used to post analyze report as GitHub issues.

Suggestion: "is used" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for docs/contributors.md

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "In order to" is wordy or unneeded

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 In order to handle correctly checking in node_modules without devDependencies, we run [Husky](https://github.com/typicode/husky) before each commit. 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are followed" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "are excluded" may be passive voice

Line 13 in 72efcc3

 This step ensures that formatting and checkin rules are followed and that devDependencies are excluded. To make sure Husky runs correctly, please use the following workflow: 

Suggestion: "correctly" can weaken meaning

Line 22 in 72efcc3

 It will also make sure these changes are appropriately included in your commit (no further work is needed) 

Suggestion: "is needed" may be passive voice

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/bad-writing-1.md

Line 3 in 72efcc3

> I simply searched "bad writing" on Google and got this.

Suggestion: "simply" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

to write a book too. Afterall, it was the onnly thing you could

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 13 in 72efcc3

of 1816 in the environs of Geneva...we occasionally amused

Suggestion: "occasionally" can weaken meaning

Lines 15 to 16 in 72efcc3

 excited in us a playful desire of imitation" So, people were 

 stuck inside and bored. Mary Shelley decided to write a book

Suggestion: "were stuck" may be passive voice

Line 17 in 72efcc3

becuase it was so awful outside. I can totally see her point,

Suggestion: "it was" is wordy or unneeded

Line 23 in 72efcc3

Hmmm... This is really bad.

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 72efcc3

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 72efcc3

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for horrible/offensive.md

Line 5 in 72efcc3

 Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas...i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me. Ja rule is about pride in da music man. dont diss that shit on him. and nothin is wrong bein like tupac he was a brother too...fuckin white boys get things right next time. 

Suggestion: "things" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "it seems that" is wordy or unneeded

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "obviously" is a weasel word

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "relatively" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "am interested" may be passive voice

Line 7 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix says that I am loosing credibility. it seems that when ever someone comes and tells something else he looses credibility. let me introduce myself first I am new comer here and not (obviously) in any way professionaly involved in history studies (I have a PHD in Neuroscience). and not getting any money from the Turkish goverment. and I am not a Holocoust denying neo-nazi either.I just read the article because of the relatively new debate here in Germany(ok i will be honest I have a Turkish girl friend and I am interested in Turkish history. and now i am using her computer. Does that reduce my credibility, probably yes ha?). I am sory to give this description but I get the impression that i will soon be blamed of beeing a Turkish propagandist, goverment person, racist whatever. Am I too sensitive. No take a look at the discussion history and see that these accusations are there. 

Suggestion: "be blamed" may be passive voice

Line 8 in 72efcc3

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "largely" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 8 in 72efcc3

 I am making clear points that any sane unbiased human cam make. First of all the article issues the Genocide as a fact! A fact but with still some discussions (most of them being from the Turkish goverment). This gives the inevitible impression that all issiue is largely accepted(final verdict). Yet it is not!!! 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "be used" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "are met" may be passive voice

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "carelessly" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 9 in 72efcc3

 Secondly the term Genocide can only be used under certain conditions (as in the holocoust). in this case there is a real doubt if these conditions are met!!! still the article freely and carelessly uses the term just only because some people or countries recogonise it that way. Do we have the right to blame a nation with this ultimate crime just because of that??? Genocide guys this is no joke!!! tell it 100 times for 90 years and Turks are Genociders! Cool! 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "clearly" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "Many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "were fooled" may be passive voice

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 third: after building up the genocide idea The article mainly represents the opposing view as the view of the Turkish goverment as clearly described by the headings (the position of Turkey,the position of Turkish authorities, political issues) as well as the content. which inevitibly gives the impression that the opposing view is just bull S*** Turkish propaganda. But it is not! Many Prof. and researcher of the era say that it is not. (As seen in the attached letter). yet fadix wrote that these prof were actually accepting the genocide they were fooled in to this (quoting Israel Charny). this is ridiculous. I dont know who the hell is Israel Charny or he really claims something like that. But please we are not stupid people. this was a letter to the representatives and these people who signed it are Profs. for gods sake!!! also If these prof were in favor of the genocide and really fooled in this conspiracy later they would have said ""ok guys I am misslead and fooled into this"" and this would be the ultimate tool for Armenian side too ridicule and discredit the Turkish side. Is it the case? No!(so fadix what about credibility) 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Line 12 in 72efcc3

 I am not bitching anyone. I am not using citations and names to blurr peoples mind. if you read my previous adds you will see that i am trying to use a carefull language. I am sorry again if I used harsh words. But after reading the long history of discussion in this page I have the impression that Fadix (who seems to be the main edittor in this page)has a certain attitude towards the issue and despite serious oppsition now and in the past he is just pushing the article his way. 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "crystal clear" is a cliche

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 ok Fadix I believe in your good faith. I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history .please give me answers. I am just asking plain, crystal clear questions. I dont want to hear citations, dates and historian names. just logical anwers!! Just logical answers which will show that you are unbiased!!! Or you may choose to say I believe in Armenian genocide and that is why I chose to ignore... 

Suggestion: "are unbiased" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "easily" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is desribed" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "be declared" may be passive voice

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 1. how can you use the nomenclature or lets say the word ""genocide"" so easily knowing that it is desribed and only can be declared by international law. also knowing that there is robust objections to the usage of this term. Are you the ultimate expert. Are you the head of an international court?(if yes where is self defence?) ((you say Go try finding such a section in the Cambodian genocide article, the Nanking massacre article, Rwanda genocide article. I could not see a Cambodian genocide article, in Rwanda genocide: United Nations set up the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, so the guild is described by law. Nanking massacre is a perfect example!!! why is it not called a genocide but massacre? is it because the guilt is not described by law??!! and in the discussion there is no real objection to the issue accept the numbers) 

Suggestion: "is described" may be passive voice

Line 18 in 72efcc3

 2. why does the article present the genocide as a fact? (I hope you wont tell that it doesnt). why do you build up the article so that people are first instructed that there is indeed a genocide and only later show the objetions. 

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: issue found in 5 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history
Check for obscene content: issue found in 2 sentences. 😟
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- dont diss that shit on him
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: issue found in 8 sentences. 😟
- # Not Respectful TextYou suck
- Yo bitch Ja Rule is more succesful then you'll ever be whats up with you and hating you sad mofuckas
- i should bitch slap ur pethedic white faces and get you to kiss my ass you guys sicken me
- dont diss that shit on him
- fuckin white boys get things right next time
- this is ridiculous
- But please we are not stupid people
- I am a dumb ass who doesnt know any thing about history

Report for horrible/ignore/ignore-me.md

Line 1 in 72efcc3

# This readme should be ignored.

Suggestion: "be ignored" may be passive voice

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "Just" can weaken meaning

Line 3 in 72efcc3

 Just to make it obvious that this file is ignored no matter what, I will put a bunch of horrible writing here in case 

Suggestion: "is ignored" may be passive voice

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "it is" is wordy or unneeded

Line 4 in 72efcc3

that it is only ignored because there is nothing to fix.

Suggestion: "only" can weaken meaning

Line 10 in 72efcc3

 hardly erotic, much less romantic. Furthermore, it suggests a one-sided relationship: Felicity passively exists to slake Ricardo’s 

Suggestion: "hardly" can weaken meaning

Line 11 in 72efcc3

 thirst. Actually, this calls to mind Plato’s observation: “As wolves loves sheep, so lovers love their loves.” Wait, maybe it’s 

Suggestion: "maybe" can weaken meaning

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "There are" is unnecessary verbiage

Line 14 in 72efcc3

 There are so many. Where do I start? Okay, take Mariann Simms's winner from 2004: They had but one last remaining night together, 

Suggestion: "many" is a weasel word and can weaken meaning

Line 15 in 72efcc3

 so they embraced each other as tightly as that two-flavor entwined string cheese that is orange and yellowish-white, the orange 

Suggestion: "tightly" can weaken meaning

Line 16 in 72efcc3

 probably being a bland Cheddar and the white . . . Mozzarella, although it could possibly be Provolone or just plain American, as 

Suggestion: "just" can weaken meaning

Line 17 in 72efcc3

 it really doesn't taste distinctly dissimilar from the orange, yet they would have you believe it does by coloring it differently. 

Suggestion: "really" can weaken meaning

Sentiment Analysis:

Check for identity attack: no issue found 👌
Check for insult: no issue found 👌
Check for obscene content: no issue found 👌
Check for severe toxic content: no issue found 👌
Check for sexual explicit content: no issue found 👌
Check for threating content: no issue found 👌
Check for toxic content: no issue found 👌

Report for src/README.md