Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update datetime marshal to use UnixNano() #171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

TheRangiCrew
Copy link
Contributor

Previously used t.Nanosecond() which caused the marshalling to almost always result to t = 0. This fixes that.

Fixes #170

@remade remade merged commit fffe8a0 into surrealdb:main Nov 22, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: CustomDatetime Marshal() uses wrong nanoseconds
2 participants