Navigation Fix

[Mitzi-Laszlo]

No description provided.

[csarven]

I don't know about everyone else but I find it challenging to keep up. I don't know if and why this PR needs an Editor review.. I also don't know why or what led to this PR - of course I can manually go ahead and search for other activities that have something to do with "navigation" for moving a "labs" file, but I hope everyone can sympathise that this is extremely inefficient. When we have zillion issues flying around on many repositories... I can't make the connection immediately.

I'd consider this PR to be a minor change that the Creators should approve or just even skip PRs and commit right into staging. Too trivial of a change that should not require so many people involved. Let's try to move Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?

[Mitzi-Laszlo]

There has been an issue raised by the community talking about making the website editing and review process more efficient solid/process#217

Previously, rather than having staging/master and editorial review the Creators were trusted with keeping track of keeping the website up to date as long as it was in line with @timbl quotes and reviewed technical content. If the website content was not in line with reviewed technical content @timbl review was needed for website changes.

What is adding complication is now that so many people are involved in website updates and general communication is that a lot of tailored explanation is needed to be repeated multiple times at each step which is adding a lot of overhead for everyone.

The Editors already have a lot on their plate with specification editing, and adding website reviews seems to be an additional distracting burden that is hard for them to keep up with on time.

[Vinnl]

This looks like a minor change that doesn't need editorial approval.