Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC] Other front end boards #2

Open
dtcallcock opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

[RFC] Other front end boards #2

dtcallcock opened this issue Feb 18, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member

Right now it looks like DiPho will be a two board device, with one board having the photodiode + amp, and one board having the DAC, uC, power, and communications. It has already been mentioned that different versions of the photodiode board could be produced in the future (eg. with log amp). One could imagine a much broader range of applications though (eg. analog front end for voltage monitoring/logging, environmental monitors). I mention it now as, if this is thought to be a good idea, it may influence exactly how things are divided between the two boards and what kind of header should go between them.

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

Rf power meter + frequency counter is another idea.

@gkasprow
Copy link
Member

true, it could be a laser driver, humidity sensor, single channel Sampler, optical power meter, etc. I would expose all pins we have

@dhslichter
Copy link
Member

is this too much mission creep? there are a million little commodity IoT widgets out there. I don't think it hurts to expose all available pins, but maybe better to focus on making this a good photodiode monitor first?

@dtcallcock
Copy link
Member Author

better to focus on making this a good photodiode monitor first?

I'd argue that the photodiode aspect of this project is trivial. The 'IoT widget' aspect seems to be the tricky part and thus I think we should consider leveraging effort put in there.

is this too much mission creep?

I think this issue is more about keeping this in mind and not doing anything to preclude it unless there is good reason, rather than creeping the mission.

@dhslichter
Copy link
Member

dhslichter commented Feb 19, 2021

I'd argue that the photodiode aspect of this project is trivial.

Agreed. But making a good photodiode monitor is less about the photodiode circuit and more about the digital side of things, in this instance.

I think this issue is more about keeping this in mind and not doing anything to preclude it unless there is good reason, rather than creeping the mission.

Fair. Just wanted to raise the point. It's already starting to look like the all-singing, all-dancing IoT widget with 4 different communication protocols and 3 connectors and power harvesting and....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants