Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implicit conversions for put/get #5056

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gf712
Copy link
Member

@gf712 gf712 commented Jun 4, 2020

Implicit conversions as discussed in #5045. Would have to add all the primitive types, and probably come up with some better abstraction. This does the same as the Any::CastingRegistry, but by putting all this logic in SGObject we can add some very specific edge cases, like std::variant. I think this separates Any as a "type safe" type erasure abstraction from the parameters that use it.

EXPECT_THROW(obj->get<float64_t>(MockObject::kInt), ShogunException);
EXPECT_THROW(obj->get(Tag<float64_t>(MockObject::kInt)), ShogunException);
EXPECT_EQ(obj->get<float64_t>(MockObject::kInt), 10.0);
EXPECT_EQ(obj->get(Tag<float64_t>(MockObject::kInt)), 10.0);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@karlnapf so this won't throw anymore

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep.
But everything that looses information throws?
maybe a test for some examples?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

by lose information you mean something like 1.3 becomes 1? Right now I think this function only supports checks for overflow, e.g. int -10 is converted to unsigned int.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we wouldnt want that to happen for now I think.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vigsterkr would it make sense to extend safe_convert to check floating point casting to integers and see if the delta is larger than fepsilon?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I always thought that the safe_convert functions would be for overflow checks, not for loss of information when going from discrete to floating?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(on the other hand, why not :) )

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 9, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Dec 9, 2020
@gf712 gf712 added Tag: Cleanup and removed stale labels Dec 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants