feat:Support excluded html tag attributes in bbcode formats with false

[live627]

No description provided.

[live627]

I notice that this function assumes that returning false short circuits utilis.each, similar to dom.traverse. Only... it doesn't. Was that an oversight or was each()never intended to short circuit?

[live627]

Digging deeper to answer my own question, it seems that the code in question is a holdover from back when jQuery was used. I'll need to test it to see how it breaks things.

[live627]

I'm converting this one to a draft for now until I can write up a bunch of unit tests for the possibility of compound tag matching.

[live627]

Before i look into writing some tests for this, what are your thoughts @samclarke

[samclarke]

Looks good, would be useful to have. It does look like it would change the behaviour of false in matching but as only null is documented that should be fine.

[live627]

I actually didn't think of that. I'm going to set this to target v4.0.0 because of the BC break. Might be silly since it is undocumented. And there may be a chance that someone might be doing it that way.