Add size and len for PageRange, PhysFrameRange, PageRangeInclusive and PhysFrameRangeInclusive

[Wasabi375]

No description provided.

[Freax13]

Thank you for your contribution!

[Wasabi375]

Looks like the latest nightly version is breaking some of the asm! instructions. I would fix it, but I'm not sure what the problematic label in the assembly does, so I don't feel qualified :(

impl Segment for CS {
    get_reg_impl!("cs");

    /// Note this is special since we cannot directly move to [`CS`]; x86 requires the instruction
    /// pointer and [`CS`] to be set at the same time. To do this, we push the new segment selector
    /// and return value onto the stack and use a "far return" (`retfq`) to reload [`CS`] and
    /// continue at the end of our function.
    ///
    /// Note we cannot use a "far call" (`lcall`) or "far jmp" (`ljmp`) to do this because then we
    /// would only be able to jump to 32-bit instruction pointers. Only Intel implements support
    /// for 64-bit far calls/jumps in long-mode, AMD does not.
    #[inline]
    unsafe fn set_reg(sel: SegmentSelector) {
        unsafe {
            asm!(
                "push {sel}",
                "lea {tmp}, [1f + rip]",
                "push {tmp}",
                "retfq",
                "1:", // ERROR: avoid using labels containing only the digits `0` and `1` in inline assembly
                sel = in(reg) u64::from(sel.0),
                tmp = lateout(reg) _,
                options(preserves_flags),
            );
        }
    }
}

[Freax13]

Looks like the latest nightly version is breaking some of the asm! instructions. I would fix it, but I'm not sure what the problematic label in the assembly does, so I don't feel qualified :(

impl Segment for CS {
    get_reg_impl!("cs");

    /// Note this is special since we cannot directly move to [`CS`]; x86 requires the instruction
    /// pointer and [`CS`] to be set at the same time. To do this, we push the new segment selector
    /// and return value onto the stack and use a "far return" (`retfq`) to reload [`CS`] and
    /// continue at the end of our function.
    ///
    /// Note we cannot use a "far call" (`lcall`) or "far jmp" (`ljmp`) to do this because then we
    /// would only be able to jump to 32-bit instruction pointers. Only Intel implements support
    /// for 64-bit far calls/jumps in long-mode, AMD does not.
    #[inline]
    unsafe fn set_reg(sel: SegmentSelector) {
        unsafe {
            asm!(
                "push {sel}",
                "lea {tmp}, [1f + rip]",
                "push {tmp}",
                "retfq",
                "1:", // ERROR: avoid using labels containing only the digits `0` and `1` in inline assembly
                sel = in(reg) u64::from(sel.0),
                tmp = lateout(reg) _,
                options(preserves_flags),
            );
        }
    }
}

I just opened #492 to fix that.

[Freax13]

Do you mind waiting until #492 is merged or do you need this to be merged sooner?

[Wasabi375]

I dont mind waiting. I will need to use my own branch anyways as I also rely on changes on the next branch. At least I think I do. I currently have a commit from the next branch pinned, so I probably need to merge this change and next for my stuff to work.

[Freax13]

Could you rebase this onto the latest master branch?