Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables #122662
Open
+206
−116
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2024
Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included. This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum` (opening for perf first)
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
1 similar comment
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (58f8d0e): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 668.447s -> 665.442s (-0.45%) |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-perf
3 tasks
|
Can't we instead just emit a single no-op drop function shared by all these types, instead of using |
|
Let's discuss on the MCP Zulip thread to avoid splitting the discussion. |
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
optional-drop
branch
from
288ece0
to
080d085
Compare
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-perf
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 27, 2024
Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included. This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime. Accepted MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#730
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
optional-drop
branch
from
080d085
to
e4f3c16
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
optional-drop
branch
from
96eed21
to
d2277a2
Compare
|
@bors r=oli-obk,bjorn3 rollup=iffy Fixed another test. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included. This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. That's hard to avoid without changing the vtable format (e.g., to use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime.
Mark-Simulacrum
force-pushed
the
optional-drop
branch
from
d2277a2
to
ab17641
Compare
|
@bors r=oli-obk,bjorn3 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2024
…-obk,bjorn3 Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included. This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime. Accepted MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#730
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors retry Connection reset by peer in remote-test-client |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2024
…-obk,bjorn3 Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included. This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime. Accepted MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#730
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included.
This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime.
Accepted MCP: rust-lang/compiler-team#730