New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimized forwarding callers and callees #10510
Open
tenderlove
wants to merge
2
commits into
ruby:master
Choose a base branch
from
tenderlove:speed-forward
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+753
−106
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tenderlove
force-pushed
the
speed-forward
branch
from
April 11, 2024 23:49
e12e759
to
19040d6
Compare
ko1
reviewed
Apr 12, 2024
tenderlove
force-pushed
the
speed-forward
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 12, 2024 18:48
2929a9d
to
192b1b8
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tenderlove
force-pushed
the
speed-forward
branch
11 times, most recently
from
April 19, 2024 16:36
2964451
to
93c71fe
Compare
tenderlove
force-pushed
the
speed-forward
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 24, 2024 22:24
46ef870
to
063df23
Compare
This patch optimizes forwarding callers and callees. It only optimizes methods that only take `...` as their parameter, and then pass `...` to other calls. Calls it optimizes look like this: ```ruby def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(...) # optimized foo(123) ``` ```ruby def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(1, 2, ...) # optimized foo(123) ``` ```ruby def bar(*a) = a def foo(...) list = [1, 2] bar(*list, ...) # optimized end foo(123) ``` All variants of the above but using `super` are also optimized, including a bare super like this: ```ruby def foo(...) super end ``` This patch eliminates intermediate allocations made when calling methods that accept `...`. We can observe allocation elimination like this: ```ruby def m x = GC.stat(:total_allocated_objects) yield GC.stat(:total_allocated_objects) - x end def bar(a) = a def foo(...) = bar(...) def test m { foo(123) } end test p test # allocates 1 object on master, but 0 objects with this patch ``` ```ruby def bar(a, b:) = a + b def foo(...) = bar(...) def test m { foo(1, b: 2) } end test p test # allocates 2 objects on master, but 0 objects with this patch ``` How does it work? ----------------- This patch works by using a dynamic stack size when passing forwarded parameters to callees. The caller's info object (known as the "CI") contains the stack size of the parameters, so we pass the CI object itself as a parameter to the callee. When forwarding parameters, the forwarding ISeq uses the caller's CI to determine how much stack to copy, then copies the caller's stack before calling the callee. The CI at the forwarded call site is adjusted using information from the caller's CI. I think this description is kind of confusing, so let's walk through an example with code. ```ruby def delegatee(a, b) = a + b def delegator(...) delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) end def caller delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) end ``` Before we call the delegator method, the stack looks like this: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 4| # | 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | 6| end | 7| | 8| def caller | -> 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 10| end | ``` The ISeq for `delegator` is tagged as "forwardable", so when `caller` calls in to `delegator`, it writes `CI1` on to the stack as a local variable for the `delegator` method. The `delegator` method has a special local called `...` that holds the caller's CI object. Here is the ISeq disasm fo `delegator`: ``` == disasm: #<ISeq:delegator@-e:1 (1,0)-(1,39)> local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) [ 1] "..."@0 0000 putself ( 1)[LiCa] 0001 getlocal_WC_0 "..."@0 0003 send <calldata!mid:delegatee, argc:0, FCALL|FORWARDING>, nil 0006 leave [Re] ``` The local called `...` will contain the caller's CI: CI1. Here is the stack when we enter `delegator`: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 -> 4| # | CI1 (argc: 2) 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | cref_or_me 6| end | specval 7| | type 8| def caller | 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 10| end | ``` The CI at `delegatee` on line 5 is tagged as "FORWARDING", so it knows to memcopy the caller's stack before calling `delegatee`. In this case, it will memcopy self, 1, and 2 to the stack before calling `delegatee`. It knows how much memory to copy from the caller because `CI1` contains stack size information (argc: 2). Before executing the `send` instruction, we push `...` on the stack. The `send` instruction pops `...`, and because it is tagged with `FORWARDING`, it knows to memcopy (using the information in the CI it just popped): ``` == disasm: #<ISeq:delegator@-e:1 (1,0)-(1,39)> local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, post: 0, block: -1, kw: -1@-1, kwrest: -1]) [ 1] "..."@0 0000 putself ( 1)[LiCa] 0001 getlocal_WC_0 "..."@0 0003 send <calldata!mid:delegatee, argc:0, FCALL|FORWARDING>, nil 0006 leave [Re] ``` Instruction 001 puts the caller's CI on the stack. `send` is tagged with FORWARDING, so it reads the CI and _copies_ the callers stack to this stack: ``` Executing Line | Code | Stack ---------------+---------------------------------------+-------- 1| def delegatee(a, b) = a + b | self 2| | 1 3| def delegator(...) | 2 4| # | CI1 (argc: 2) -> 5| delegatee(...) # CI2 (FORWARDING) | cref_or_me 6| end | specval 7| | type 8| def caller | self 9| delegator(1, 2) # CI1 (argc: 2) | 1 10| end | 2 ``` The "FORWARDING" call site combines information from CI1 with CI2 in order to support passing other values in addition to the `...` value, as well as perfectly forward splat args, kwargs, etc. Since we're able to copy the stack from `caller` in to `delegator`'s stack, we can avoid allocating objects. I want to do this to eliminate object allocations for delegate methods. My long term goal is to implement `Class#new` in Ruby and it uses `...`. I was able to implement `Class#new` in Ruby [here](ruby#9289). If we adopt the technique in this patch, then we can optimize allocating objects that take keyword parameters for `initialize`. For example, this code will allocate 2 objects: one for `SomeObject`, and one for the kwargs: ```ruby SomeObject.new(foo: 1) ``` If we combine this technique, plus implement `Class#new` in Ruby, then we can reduce allocations for this common operation. Co-Authored-By: John Hawthorn <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Alan Wu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch optimizes forwarding callers and callees. It only optimizes methods that only take
...
as their parameter, and then pass...
to other calls.Calls it optimizes look like this:
All variants of the above but using
super
are also optimized, including a bare super like this:This patch eliminates intermediate allocations made when calling methods that accept
...
. We can observe allocation elimination like this:How does it work?
This patch works by using a dynamic stack size when passing forwarded parameters to callees. The caller's info object (known as the "CI") contains the stack size of the parameters, so we pass the CI object itself as a parameter to the callee. When forwarding parameters, the forwarding ISeq uses the caller's CI to determine how much stack to copy, then copies the caller's stack before calling the callee. The CI at the forwarded call site is adjusted using information from the caller's CI.
I think this description is kind of confusing, so let's walk through an example with code.
Before we call the delegator method, the stack looks like this:
The ISeq for
delegator
is tagged as "forwardable", so whencaller
calls in todelegator
, it writesCI1
on to the stack as a local variable for thedelegator
method. Thedelegator
method has a special local called...
that holds the caller's CI object.Here is the ISeq disasm fo
delegator
:The local called
...
will contain the caller's CI: CI1.Here is the stack when we enter
delegator
:The CI at
delegatee
on line 5 is tagged as "FORWARDING", so it knows to memcopy the caller's stack before callingdelegatee
. In this case, it will memcopy 1 and 2 to the stack before callingdelegatee
. It knows how much memory to copy from the caller becauseCI1
contains stack size information (argc: 2).Before executing the
send
instruction, we push...
on the stack. Thesend
instruction pops...
, and because it is tagged withFORWARDING
, it knows to memcopy (using the information in the CI it just popped):Instruction 001 puts the caller's CI on the stack.
send
is tagged with FORWARDING, so it reads the CI and copies the callers stack to this stack:The "FORWARDING" call site combines information from CI1 with CI2 in order to support passing other values in addition to the
...
value, as well as perfectly forward splat args, kwargs, etc.Since we're able to copy the stack from
caller
in todelegator
's stack, we can avoid allocating objects.I want to do this to eliminate object allocations for delegate methods. My long term goal is to implement
Class#new
in Ruby and it uses...
.I was able to implement
Class#new
in Rubyhere.
If we adopt the technique in this patch, then we can optimize allocating objects that take keyword parameters for
initialize
.For example, this code will allocate 2 objects: one for
SomeObject
, and one for the kwargs:If we combine this technique, plus implement
Class#new
in Ruby, then we can reduce allocations for this common operation.