Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: bump jackson version #2715

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

build: bump jackson version #2715

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Vovchyk
Copy link
Contributor

@Vovchyk Vovchyk commented Sep 10, 2024

Description

  • bumped jackson version to 2.15.4
  • added processing of the StreamConstraintsException exception (which was introduced in the newer version)
    in the JsonRpcWeb3ServerHandler class

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Requires Activation Code (Hard Fork)

fed:vovchyk/jackson-ver-bump

@Vovchyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Vovchyk commented Sep 10, 2024

pipeline:run

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@fmacleal fmacleal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I just have a single doubt to understand the reason behind the testing change, because I am curious.

Comment on lines +184 to +191
int depth = 998;
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(content.length() + 2*depth);
for (long i = 0; i < depth; i++) {
sb.append("[");
}
sb.append(content);
for (long i = 0; i < depth; i++) {
sb.append("]");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question:

Is it optimising because isn't necessary a loop big how was it? Did you had to change because it was failing? What's the reason for the change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right. basically to improve perf of the test a bit. This test was hanging a bit

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants