use standard debian packages

[jmikedupont2]

removing the embedded lib and compiling using standard debian packages. The one problem that I found was the the test had the lib before the file.

[raucao]

Thanks for the PR!

I'm afraid there's currently nobody maintaining this program, and it would also need upgrading to a newer version of the remoteStorage protocol. If you're interested in fixing and perhaps even improving rs-serve, I could give you commit access and you could basically change whatever code you want (except for removing/changing the license and original author credits, of course).

Regarding the PR itself, and without knowing much about C programming, just one question: the "debian" in the title makes it sound like this might not work on other distributions? I can't see anything debian-specific though, so I guess what this is doing is requiring the dependencies to be pre-installed from whatever distro's package manager, right?

[jmikedupont2]

I dont think i am ready to take on that yet

On Oct 23, 2016 4:06 PM, "Sebastian Kippe" [email protected] wrote:

Thanks for the PR!

I'm afraid there's currently nobody maintaining this program, and it would
also need upgrading to a newer version of the remoteStorage protocol. If
you're interested in fixing and perhaps even improving rs-serve, I could
give you commit access and you could basically change whatever code you
want (except for removing/changing the license and original author credits,
of course).

Regarding the changes themselves, and without knowing much about C
programming, just one question: the "debian" in the title makes it sound
like this might not work on other distributions? I can't see anything
debian-specific though, so I guess what this is doing is requiring the
dependencies to be pre-installed from whatever distro's package manager,
right?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#13 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APqoaUBDvDeRU5UIAxp6OPwnAwtbuM_Vks5q22n-gaJpZM4KeHnu
.

[raucao]

No problem!

Care to answer my question about the code changes though? It seems like you got it building on your machine, so that would be a good improvement to merge, of course.

[jmikedupont2]

Yes. I need to revisit it. is possible to test or use it as it is. Maybe I
don't need the new stuff

On Oct 25, 2016 3:52 PM, "Sebastian Kippe" [email protected] wrote:

No problem!

Care to answer my question about the code changes though? It seems like
you got it building on your machine, so that would be a good improvement to
merge, of course.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#13 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APqoadTFpUcEHF0Q_gwQZr53LjDgemo1ks5q3l38gaJpZM4KeHnu
.