Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ui): temp fix added for rjsf schema anyof type. #722

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

billcookie
Copy link
Contributor

@billcookie billcookie commented Dec 20, 2024

Overview

react-jsonschema-form any of was not working as intended and if type "null" was set then the parameter would not work as intended.

This is a known issue and is actively being worked on: rjsf-team/react-jsonschema-form#4380

Seems like currently two solutions:

  1. We change schema definitions to include a "back up" type e.g. a string
  2. We create a temporary patch for the anyOfType issue

What I've done

  • Created a function that fixes the issue.

What I haven't done

  • manually tested on all available nodes

How I tested

  • manually on attributeaggregator node

Screenshot

Which point I want you to review particularly

  • Possible refactors/improvements

Memo

This temporary fix and we should update react-jsonschema-form when the issue is patched.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new function to enhance JSON Schema handling for anyOf types.
    • Improved the ParamEditor component to utilize the new schema processing logic.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Added a comment in the ArrayFieldItemTemplate to address potential styling issues with icons.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments within the code to clarify the new functionality and its impact on schema processing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces improvements to JSON schema handling in the UI components. A new utility function patchAnyOfType is added to address issues with anyOf type definitions in JSON schemas. The changes focus on modifying how schemas are processed, particularly in the ParamEditor component, by applying a patch that handles complex schema types more robustly. The modifications aim to enhance schema type compatibility and provide more flexible schema processing.

Changes

File Change Summary
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/patchSchemaTypes.ts Added patchAnyOfType function to modify JSON schema definitions, handling anyOf type complexities
ui/src/features/Editor/components/RightPanel/components/ParamEditor/index.tsx Integrated patchAnyOfType using useMemo to process action.parameter schema before passing to SchemaForm
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx Added a comment noting potential icon styling issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • KaWaite

Poem

🐰 Schemas dancing, types so wild,
Patching anyOf with a rabbit's smile
JSON twirls, definitions unfurl
Code transforms with a magical swirl
Complexity tamed, schema's new art! 🎩✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for reearth-flow ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1f11c22
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/reearth-flow/deploys/676509ffc403d00008131da2
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-722--reearth-flow.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@billcookie billcookie marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 06:09
@billcookie billcookie merged commit c095f40 into main Dec 20, 2024
18 checks passed
@billcookie billcookie deleted the ui/any-of-null-array-react-json-schema-issue branch December 20, 2024 06:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/patchSchemaTypes.ts (4)

4-5: Typographical fix suggestion in comments
There's a minor spelling mistake in the comment: "We should regualry check this issue."

-// We should regualry check this issue...
+// We should regularly check this issue...

16-24: Performance concern: Avoid spread in reduce accumulator
When using the spread operator on an accumulator in a reduce callback, the time complexity becomes O(n²) for large inputs. Consider using an imperative approach to append new entries to the accumulator instead.

Example fix:

- newSchema.properties = Object.entries(newSchema.properties).reduce(
-   (acc, [key, value]) => ({
-     ...acc,
-     [key]: patchAnyOfType(value),
-   }),
-   {},
- );
+ const props: NonNullable<JSONSchema7["properties"]> = {};
+ for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(newSchema.properties)) {
+   props[key] = patchAnyOfType(value);
+ }
+ newSchema.properties = props;
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 19-19: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)


26-34: Performance concern: Avoid spread in reduce accumulator
Similar reduce usage appears for definitions. Consider using the same approach as above for a more efficient solution.

Example fix:

- newSchema.definitions = Object.entries(newSchema.definitions).reduce(
-   (acc, [key, value]) => ({
-     ...acc,
-     [key]: patchAnyOfType(value),
-   }),
-   {},
- );
+ const defs: NonNullable<JSONSchema7["definitions"]> = {};
+ for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(newSchema.definitions)) {
+   defs[key] = patchAnyOfType(value);
+ }
+ newSchema.definitions = defs;
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 29-29: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)


36-47: Avoid using the delete operator to remove properties
Using the delete operator can have performance implications and affect object shape optimizations. Consider assigning to undefined instead or restructuring your logic to skip the property.

Example fix:

- delete newSchema.anyOf;
+ newSchema.anyOf = undefined;
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d906d1 and 1f11c22.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx (1 hunks)
  • ui/src/components/SchemaForm/patchSchemaTypes.ts (1 hunks)
  • ui/src/features/Editor/components/RightPanel/components/ParamEditor/index.tsx (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • ui/src/components/SchemaForm/Templates/ArrayFieldItemTemplate.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/patchSchemaTypes.ts

[error] 43-43: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)


[error] 19-19: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)


[error] 29-29: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.

Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.

(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
ui/src/components/SchemaForm/patchSchemaTypes.ts (1)

49-56: Logic confirmed for patching array items
This recursive approach to patch items (whether it's an array or single schema) is valid and clear.

ui/src/features/Editor/components/RightPanel/components/ParamEditor/index.tsx (2)

34-41: Maintain clarity on temporary patch usage
This segment correctly applies the temporary patch to fix the known RJSF issue. Ensure you remove or update this patch once the upstream library provides the official fix.


Line range hint 74-79: Schema form integration looks solid
The usage of patchedSchema in the SchemaForm ensures that the custom fix seamlessly addresses the RJSF anyOf issue without disturbing other logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants