Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integracion con padpoes #1785

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 3.13
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Bgeninatti
Copy link
Contributor

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti commented Dec 21, 2021

Integra la herramienta padpoes a los github actions.

Esta herramienta sirve para agregar una serie de revisiones automáticas en los PR:

Los inline-comments son creados utilizando github problem-matchers

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti marked this pull request as draft December 21, 2021 19:50
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti force-pushed the integracion-con-padpoes branch 2 times, most recently from 1d7392e to af5da3d Compare December 21, 2021 20:00
@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2021 23:46
@cmaureir
Copy link
Collaborator

Hola @Bgeninatti una pregunta.
Si habilitamos esto solo marcará las entradas fuzzy, vacias, memoria, etc o fallará el build?

Tenemos el caso ahora con 3.11 que tenemos que dejar unas entradas en fuzzy para que el build pase.

@Bgeninatti Bgeninatti changed the base branch from 3.10 to 3.11 October 30, 2022 22:42
@Bgeninatti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hola @cmaureir !

Hice un rebase con la rama 3.11 y pasa el build.

Estuve revisando el caso el problema reportado en #1845

Entiendo que siempre que haya una entrada que contiene el string :ref:Availability <availability> hay que marcarlo como fuzzy. Es así?

Se me ocurre que podemos agregar un chequeo en padpoes para poner una revisión automática en esas entradas como esta #2110 (comment)

que te parece?

@cmaureir cmaureir changed the base branch from 3.11 to 3.12 October 14, 2023 11:46
@cmaureir cmaureir changed the base branch from 3.12 to 3.13 November 21, 2024 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants