PEP 667: Mark as Accepted

[Eclips4]

• SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
• Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
• Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
• Resolution link points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post
• Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
• Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3784.org.readthedocs.build/pep-0667/

[hugovk]

• Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
  (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
  or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

This is needed.

For PEP 667, https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html#summary-release-highlights links to https://docs.python.org/3.13/reference/datamodel.html#frame.f_locals.

Perhaps this is enough?

[Eclips4]

• Canonical docs/spec linked with a canonical-doc directive
  (or canonical-pypa-spec for packaging PEPs,
  or canonical-typing-spec for typing PEPs)

This is needed.

For PEP 667, https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html#summary-release-highlights links to https://docs.python.org/3.13/reference/datamodel.html#frame.f_locals.

Perhaps this is enough?

I would also like to point out the "locals" function, as PRs with doc updates change its description: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/118265/files
What do you think about that?

[hugovk]

Following the 🔒 Discord discussion, let's only mark as Accepted for now.

Please could you update the PR? We don't need the canonical docs banner yet, and there should be some more docs added during the sprint.

[Eclips4]

Following the 🔒 Discord discussion, let's only mark as Accepted for now.

Please could you update the PR? We don't need the canonical docs banner yet, and there should be some more docs added during the sprint.

Done!

[hugovk]

Thanks!