Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bring web ui in line with supported caps in IPA #91

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck commented Oct 21, 2024

updates draft in line with IPA #1346.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated options for the per-user credit cap in the form.
    • Enhanced validation for commit hash input with error messaging.
  • Improvements

    • Improved state management for user input options.
    • Asynchronous fetching of branches and commit hashes for up-to-date data.
  • User Interface

    • Maintained UI structure with consistent dropdown selections for a better user experience.
    • Cosmetic updates to headings and status indicators for improved visual presentation.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 21, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
draft ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 22, 2024 0:03am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily affect the IPAForm component within the server/app/query/create/page.tsx file. Key modifications include updates to the options for the per_user_credit_cap SelectMenu, enhancements to validation logic for commit hashes, and the introduction of new state variables for managing user inputs. The form submission logic has been reorganized to utilize the existing handleFormSubmit function in two separate handlers. Additionally, the component now fetches branches and commit hashes asynchronously, ensuring the latest data is available upon rendering.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
server/app/query/create/page.tsx - Updated per_user_credit_cap options in SelectMenu from ["16", "32", "64", "128", "256"] to ["1", "2", "3", "4", "8", "16", "32", "64", "128"].
- Enhanced validation logic for commit hash input.
- Introduced several state variables for user input management.
- Reorganized form submission logic to use handleFormSubmit in two handlers.
- Implemented asynchronous fetching of branches and commit hashes.
server/.npmrc - Added configuration setting save-exact=true to ensure exact package versions are saved.
server/app/query/page.tsx - Modified class attributes in h2 and h3 elements for styling consistency.
server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx - Adjusted class attribute order in dd element for "Params" section.

Possibly related PRs

  • add page for running queries #73: The changes in server/app/query/page.tsx related to the Page component's functionality and state management are relevant as they may interact with the IPAForm component's data handling and user interface.
  • Dark mode fixes #90: The updates to dark mode styling in both server/app/query/page.tsx and server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx could be related to the UI structure of the IPAForm component, ensuring consistent visual presentation across different components.

Suggested reviewers

  • cberkhoff
  • akoshelev

Poem

In the garden where forms do play,
The options bloom in bright array.
With toggles set and hashes checked,
Our IPAForm is now perfect!
A hop, a skip, a joyful cheer,
For changes made, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1d796f and 19a7ac5.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • server/.npmrc (1 hunks)
  • server/app/query/create/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • server/app/query/page.tsx (1 hunks)
  • server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • server/.npmrc
  • server/app/query/page.tsx
  • server/app/query/view/[id]/page.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • server/app/query/create/page.tsx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
server/app/query/create/page.tsx (3)

Line range hint 359-516: LGTM: New IPA query configuration options added

The addition of new configuration options (malicious security, stall detection, multi-threading, disable metrics, and reveal aggregation) enhances the flexibility of IPA queries. The implementation using Switch components and hidden inputs is consistent and ensures that the form data always includes these fields.

For consistency, consider using a custom component for these switches to reduce code duplication. For example:

interface ToggleOptionProps {
  label: string;
  name: string;
  checked: boolean;
  onChange: (checked: boolean) => void;
}

function ToggleOption({ label, name, checked, onChange }: ToggleOptionProps) {
  return (
    <div className="items-center pt-4">
      <div className="block text-sm font-medium leading-6 text-gray-900">
        {label}
      </div>
      <div className="block pt-1 text-sm font-medium leading-6 text-gray-900">
        <Switch
          checked={checked}
          onChange={onChange}
          className={`${
            checked ? "bg-blue-600" : "bg-gray-200"
          } relative inline-flex size-6 w-11 items-center rounded-full transition-colors focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-indigo-500 focus:ring-offset-2`}
        >
          <span
            className={`${
              checked ? "translate-x-6" : "translate-x-1"
            } inline-block size-4 rounded-full bg-white transition-transform`}
          />
        </Switch>
        <input
          type="hidden"
          name={name}
          value={checked.toString()}
        />
      </div>
    </div>
  );
}

Then, you can use this component for each option:

<ToggleOption
  label="Malicious Security"
  name="malicious_security"
  checked={maliciousSecurityEnabled}
  onChange={setMaliciousSecurityEnabled}
/>
// Repeat for other options

This would make the code more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies between different options.


Line range hint 534-679: LGTM: Improved SelectMenu components with better state management

The refactoring of SelectMenu and PassedStateSelectMenu components improves code reusability and consistency. The addition of disabled state handling in PassedStateSelectMenu is well-implemented, providing both visual feedback and functional restrictions.

Consider extracting the disabled styling logic into a separate utility function or constant to improve readability and maintainability. For example:

const getDisabledStyles = (disabled: boolean) => 
  disabled ? "opacity-25 pointer-events-none" : "";

// Then use it like this:
<div className={`relative ${getDisabledStyles(disabled)}`}>
  {/* ... */}
</div>

This would make it easier to update the disabled styling across all components if needed in the future.


Backend Missing Implementation for New Configuration Options

The backend does not handle the new configuration options introduced in the frontend:

  • malicious_security
  • stall_detection
  • multi_threading
  • disable_metrics
  • reveal_aggregation

Please implement the necessary backend logic to process these configuration fields to ensure full functionality.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-679: Overall LGTM: Significant improvements to IPAForm and UI components

The changes in this PR successfully achieve the objective of bringing the web UI in line with supported caps in IPA. Key improvements include:

  1. Updated per_user_credit_cap options for more granular control.
  2. Addition of new configuration options (malicious security, stall detection, etc.) enhancing IPA query flexibility.
  3. Improved form validation and user feedback, particularly for commit hash selection.
  4. Refactored SelectMenu components for better reusability and state management.

These changes enhance the functionality and user experience of the IPA query creation process while maintaining code quality and consistency.

To ensure that these UI changes align with the backend capabilities, please run the following verification:

This will help confirm that the backend is prepared to handle the new configuration options introduced in the UI.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new UI options are supported by the backend API

# Check for new configuration options in the API endpoints
rg -i "malicious_security|stall_detection|multi_threading|disable_metrics|reveal_aggregation" server/

Length of output: 449


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the backend API processes the new UI configuration options

# Search for where the new configuration options are implemented in backend API handlers
rg -i "malicious_security|stall_detection|multi_threading|disable_metrics|reveal_aggregation" server/ --context 3

Length of output: 2323

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6b0ee9 and a1d796f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/app/query/create/page.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
server/app/query/create/page.tsx (2)

354-354: LGTM: Updated per_user_credit_cap options align with IPA changes

The new options for per_user_credit_cap now include smaller values, which aligns with the PR objective to bring the web UI in line with supported caps in IPA. This change provides users with more granular control over the credit cap.


Line range hint 518-532: LGTM: Improved form submission button behavior

The changes to the submit button enhance user experience by:

  1. Providing visual feedback (opacity change) when the button is disabled.
  2. Preventing form submission when the commit hash is invalid or empty.

The use of clsx for conditional class names is a good practice, making the code more readable and maintainable.

Copy link
Collaborator

@akoshelev akoshelev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck merged commit a38d945 into main Oct 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck deleted the small-cap branch October 22, 2024 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants