-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
preserve helper logs on bounce #87
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
defeb2c
to
8963aa4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
server/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- server/package.json (1 hunks)
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ | |||
"chartjs-adapter-spacetime": "^1.0.1", | |||
"clsx": "^2.0.0", | |||
"haikunator": "^2.1.2", | |||
"next": "14.2.11", | |||
"next": "=14.2.11", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider the trade-offs of exact version pinning
The change from "next": "^14.2.11"
to "next": "=14.2.11"
locks the Next.js version to exactly 14.2.11. While this ensures consistency across environments, it may prevent automatic security updates and bug fixes.
Consider these alternatives:
- Use a tilde (
~
) instead of an equals sign to allow patch updates:"next": "~14.2.11"
- Keep the caret (
^
) to allow minor updates, but use a package lock file to ensure consistency. - If exact pinning is necessary, implement a process to regularly check for and manually update to new versions.
Could you explain the reasoning behind this exact version pinning? If it's to address a specific issue, consider documenting it in a comment.
e74070c
to
ef519b6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sidecar/app/routes/start.py (1)
64-65
: Consider a more comprehensive approach to handling complex function signaturesWhile adding pylint disable comments addresses the immediate linter warnings, it doesn't solve the underlying issue of complex function signatures. This approach might lead to decreased code quality and maintainability in the long run.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Conduct a comprehensive review of function signatures across the project to identify patterns of overly complex functions.
- Develop a consistent strategy for handling complex parameter sets, such as using configuration objects or dataclasses.
- Consider creating a custom pylint plugin or configuration that aligns with your project's standards for function complexity.
- Document any decisions made about function complexity and parameter handling in your project's coding guidelines.
By addressing this issue systematically, you can improve overall code quality, maintainability, and consistency across the project.
Also applies to: 157-158
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- sidecar/app/routes/start.py (2 hunks)
- sidecar/cli/cli.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- sidecar/cli/cli.py
# pylint: disable=too-many-arguments | ||
# pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to reduce the number of arguments
While adding pylint disable comments addresses the immediate linter warnings, it might be beneficial to consider refactoring the function to reduce the number of arguments. This could improve the function's maintainability and readability.
Potential refactoring options:
- Group related parameters into a configuration object or dataclass.
- Use keyword-only arguments to make the function calls more explicit.
- Consider if some of these parameters could be set as default configurations elsewhere.
Example refactoring:
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class IPAHelperConfig:
gate_type: str
stall_detection: bool
multi_threading: bool
disable_metrics: bool
reveal_aggregation: bool
def start_ipa_helper(
query_id: str,
commit_hash: str,
config: IPAHelperConfig,
background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
request: Request
):
# Function implementation
This approach would reduce the number of direct arguments and make the function signature cleaner.
# pylint: disable=too-many-arguments | ||
# pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring to reduce the number of arguments
Similar to the start_ipa_helper
function, it would be beneficial to refactor this function to reduce the number of arguments. This can improve maintainability and readability of the code.
Suggested refactoring approach:
- Group related parameters into a configuration object or dataclass.
- Use keyword-only arguments for clarity.
Example refactoring:
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass
class IPAQueryConfig:
size: int
max_breakdown_key: int
max_trigger_value: int
per_user_credit_cap: int
malicious_security: bool
def start_ipa_query(
query_id: str,
commit_hash: str,
config: IPAQueryConfig,
background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
request: Request
):
# Function implementation
This refactoring would simplify the function signature and make it easier to add or modify parameters in the future without changing the function signature.
adds a timestamp to the log file that the draft process writes to, so that it's not overwritten when we restart draft.
Summary by CodeRabbit
next
package version specification to an exact version, preventing automatic updates.