Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

preserve helper logs on bounce #87

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck commented Sep 25, 2024

adds a timestamp to the log file that the draft process writes to, so that it's not overwritten when we restart draft.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved logging functionality for the helper sidecar command, ensuring unique timestamped log files for each execution.
  • Chores
    • Updated the next package version specification to an exact version, preventing automatic updates.
  • Documentation
    • Enhanced comments for code quality management in several functions, clarifying pylint directives.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
draft ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 26, 2024 2:12am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the etc/start_helper_sidecar.sh script to improve logging functionality for the run-helper-sidecar command. A new variable, log_file, has been introduced to generate a log file name dynamically based on the current date and time, replacing the previous static path. Additionally, the server/package.json file has been updated to change the version specification of the next package from a caret (^) notation to an exact version (=), which restricts updates to a specific version. Comments in sidecar/cli/cli.py have also been updated for clarity regarding pylint directives.

Changes

File Change Summary
etc/start_helper_sidecar.sh Introduced log_file variable for dynamic log file naming based on date and time; updated output redirection.
server/package.json Changed next package version specification from "^14.2.11" to "=14.2.11" to prevent automatic updates.
sidecar/cli/cli.py Updated pylint directive comments from too-many-arguments to too-many-positional-arguments for clarity.
sidecar/app/routes/start.py Added pylint disable comments for start_ipa_helper and start_ipa_query functions to address argument count warnings.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the logs where bunnies hop,
A new file name will never stop.
With timestamps bright, they dance and play,
Each run a tale of the day!
Hoppy logs, oh what a sight,
In the moon's soft, gentle light! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8963aa4 and 3e7f011.

🔇 Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • server/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/package.json (1 hunks)

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
"chartjs-adapter-spacetime": "^1.0.1",
"clsx": "^2.0.0",
"haikunator": "^2.1.2",
"next": "14.2.11",
"next": "=14.2.11",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider the trade-offs of exact version pinning

The change from "next": "^14.2.11" to "next": "=14.2.11" locks the Next.js version to exactly 14.2.11. While this ensures consistency across environments, it may prevent automatic security updates and bug fixes.

Consider these alternatives:

  1. Use a tilde (~) instead of an equals sign to allow patch updates: "next": "~14.2.11"
  2. Keep the caret (^) to allow minor updates, but use a package lock file to ensure consistency.
  3. If exact pinning is necessary, implement a process to regularly check for and manually update to new versions.

Could you explain the reasoning behind this exact version pinning? If it's to address a specific issue, consider documenting it in a comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
sidecar/app/routes/start.py (1)

64-65: Consider a more comprehensive approach to handling complex function signatures

While adding pylint disable comments addresses the immediate linter warnings, it doesn't solve the underlying issue of complex function signatures. This approach might lead to decreased code quality and maintainability in the long run.

Suggestions for improvement:

  1. Conduct a comprehensive review of function signatures across the project to identify patterns of overly complex functions.
  2. Develop a consistent strategy for handling complex parameter sets, such as using configuration objects or dataclasses.
  3. Consider creating a custom pylint plugin or configuration that aligns with your project's standards for function complexity.
  4. Document any decisions made about function complexity and parameter handling in your project's coding guidelines.

By addressing this issue systematically, you can improve overall code quality, maintainability, and consistency across the project.

Also applies to: 157-158

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e74070c and ef519b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • sidecar/app/routes/start.py (2 hunks)
  • sidecar/cli/cli.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • sidecar/cli/cli.py

Comment on lines +64 to +65
# pylint: disable=too-many-arguments
# pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider refactoring to reduce the number of arguments

While adding pylint disable comments addresses the immediate linter warnings, it might be beneficial to consider refactoring the function to reduce the number of arguments. This could improve the function's maintainability and readability.

Potential refactoring options:

  1. Group related parameters into a configuration object or dataclass.
  2. Use keyword-only arguments to make the function calls more explicit.
  3. Consider if some of these parameters could be set as default configurations elsewhere.

Example refactoring:

from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class IPAHelperConfig:
    gate_type: str
    stall_detection: bool
    multi_threading: bool
    disable_metrics: bool
    reveal_aggregation: bool

def start_ipa_helper(
    query_id: str,
    commit_hash: str,
    config: IPAHelperConfig,
    background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
    request: Request
):
    # Function implementation

This approach would reduce the number of direct arguments and make the function signature cleaner.

Comment on lines +157 to +158
# pylint: disable=too-many-arguments
# pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider refactoring to reduce the number of arguments

Similar to the start_ipa_helper function, it would be beneficial to refactor this function to reduce the number of arguments. This can improve maintainability and readability of the code.

Suggested refactoring approach:

  1. Group related parameters into a configuration object or dataclass.
  2. Use keyword-only arguments for clarity.

Example refactoring:

from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class IPAQueryConfig:
    size: int
    max_breakdown_key: int
    max_trigger_value: int
    per_user_credit_cap: int
    malicious_security: bool

def start_ipa_query(
    query_id: str,
    commit_hash: str,
    config: IPAQueryConfig,
    background_tasks: BackgroundTasks,
    request: Request
):
    # Function implementation

This refactoring would simplify the function signature and make it easier to add or modify parameters in the future without changing the function signature.

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck merged commit 40e7c9b into main Sep 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck deleted the preserve-helper-logs-on-bounce branch September 26, 2024 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants