-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Subspace to the list #110
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Subspace is a layer one blockchain with over 300 stars on a [Github repo](https://github.com/subspace/subspace) and 10,000 nodes according to [telemetry](https://telemetry.subspace.network/#/0x0c121c75f4ef450f40619e1fca9d1e8e7fbabc42c895bc4790801e85d5a91c34). Would appreciate if you add the project to the list, thanks!
@@ -199,6 +199,7 @@ maintained by [Parity Technologies](https://www.parity.io/). Source code availab | |||
- [SubQuery](https://subquery.network) - A GraphQL indexer and query service that allows users to easily create indexed data sources and host them online for free. | |||
- [Nova SubQuery API](https://github.com/nova-wallet/subquery-nova) - A SubQuery API implementation for operation history and staking analytics. | |||
- [Subscan](https://www.subscan.io/) - Multi-network explorer for Substrate-based chains. | |||
- [Subspace](https://github.com/subspace/subspace) - The first layer-one blockchain that can fully resolve the blockchain trilemma by simultaneously achieving scalability, security, and decentralization. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's certainly not the first. This trilemma was always bullshit. It's just that early chains designs were dumb.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Curious what other projects you're referring to that solved the scalability issues with no compromises?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Polkadot. Mina maybe first. Many zk roll ups. (all somewhat conventional looking threat models)
Omniledger paper was kinda early too. An implementation even exists, unsure if ever deployed. (80% honest)
All the false cases poses a problem here too..
Optimistic roll ups claim this. Imho they're wrong, but arguing that gets nasty: Alone, the word "secure" means "in threat models reasonable experts accept", not "in the threat model that favors my pet project." You need to write down their implicit assumptions before arguing they're unreaosnable. Afaik nobody ever bothered.
Payment channels claim this. Afaik they're secure, but not really scalable. Although easier, arguing this still becomes nasty.
Individual bridges between two chains cannot be called scalable, but if both chains have real finality then their threat model is 2/3 honest on both, not all necessarily so bad. A bridge ecosystem like cosmos becomes scalable, but wrecks this threat model. It's plauslbe however that cosmos' airdrop culture kinda adequately addressed this in practice, if only by dumb luck. Afak nobody ever surveyed zones' validator overlap. At least this should fall appart easily if you keep everything in theory land.
Subspace is a layer-one blockchain with over 300 stars on a Github repo and 10,000 nodes according to telemetry. Would appreciate if you add the project to the list, thanks!