net-snmp: support compilation with GCC 11 permissively #25577
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use #elif defined instead of #elifdef as seen elsewhere throughout the patch
file. This avoids the following errors when compiling with GCC 11:
```
mibgroup/ucd-snmp/proc.c:45:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #elifdef; did you mean #ifdef?
45 | #elifdef HAVE_PCRE_H
| ^~~~~~~
| ifdef
mibgroup/ucd-snmp/proc.c:243:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #elifdef; did you mean #ifdef?
243 | #elifdef HAVE_PCRE_H
| ^~~~~~~
| ifdef
```
Signed-off-by: Wei-Ting Yang <[email protected]>
Yang-Wei-Ting
force-pushed
the
elifdef-to-elif-defined
branch
from
c103291 to
27bf1e7
Compare
|
where is GCC11 used? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Maintainer: @stintel
Compile tested: armv7, imx/cortexa7, OpenWrt 23.05
Description:
200-add-pcre2-support.patch uses
#elif defined9 times and#elifdeftwice.Maybe we can change those two
#elifdefto#elif definedso that it is more consistent and more permissive to GCC 11?