Docs: Document about roles, people and processes

[tordans]

@tyrasd following our conversation on the last iD community call I created this draft of a separate document that gives more visibility on who is doing what in this repository and how some of the core processes are strucutres.

This is not as fleshed out as #1229, especially the process part. But a good way to improve this will be using it and changing it over time, I think.

In this document I changed my role to the contributor role which I still offer to do.

---

Parts of this are inspired by https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/blob/master/AUTHORS.md – thanks a lot

[github-actions]

🍱 You can preview the tagging presets of this pull request here.

[tordans]

In https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/creating-a-default-community-health-file#supported-file-types the suggested name for this file is GOVERNANCE.md

A GOVERNANCE file lets people know about how your project is governed. For example, it might discuss project roles and how decisions are made.

I think this fits what we are trying to do here so I think we should use this name.

[matkoniecz]

Suggested change

	- PRs need approval from two people: the author and one more contributors before being merged.
	- PRs need approval from two people: the author and one or more contributors before being merged.

[matkoniecz]

There are other ways to amend this. BTW, is "contributor" requiring any experience/presence? Past accepted PR? It is kind of unclear

[tordans]

BTW, is "contributor" requiring any experience/presence? Past accepted PR? It is kind of unclear

I just added a very high level section to handle the question how the defined roles are assigned https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1230/files#diff-87a0c4623bffa64c60b62a39eeab1c40bd0f329cebc177f5e4492555fb5d42aeR68-R73
This does not go into details on which criteria are used to make this decision which is IMO fine because in the absence of published criteria it is clear IMO that the person responsible for the step will have to make a judgement decision.

Ping @tyrasd

[matkoniecz]

Just to clarify: all comments I made here are not statement/request/official communication of any organization. And it is just my regular, hopefully useful, nitpicking/debugging.