Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix gpuCost computation error #2658

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: v1.109
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ElieLiabeuf
Copy link

What does this PR change?

Solve gpuCost computation error

Does this PR address any GitHub or Zendesk issues?

Closes #2657

Does this PR require changes to documentation?

No

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 22, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
opencost ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 25, 2024 10:11am

@mattray
Copy link
Collaborator

mattray commented Mar 22, 2024

@ElieLiabeuf thanks for the contribution. Could you sign your commit and fix the DCO warning? This looks relatively straightforward

@mattray mattray added opencost OpenCost issues vs. external/downstream P1 Estimated Priority (P0 is highest, P4 is lowest) kubecost Relevant to Kubecost's downstream project E2 Estimated level of Effort (1 is easiest, 4 is hardest) labels Mar 22, 2024
Signed-off-by: Elie Liabeuf <[email protected]>
@ElieLiabeuf
Copy link
Author

@ElieLiabeuf thanks for the contribution. Could you sign your commit and fix the DCO warning? This looks relatively straightforward

It's fixed, thanks.

@mattray
Copy link
Collaborator

mattray commented Apr 10, 2024

@AjayTripathy you asked him to contribute this patch in #2657, could you review?

@AjayTripathy
Copy link
Contributor

AjayTripathy commented Apr 11, 2024

@ElieLiabeuf this generally LGTM but I'm struggling to test this on my end without shared GPUs. Could you share how you tested and verified this fix?

In particular, could you share the results of /costDataModel after the fix along with node labels? I think that should be sufficient to get this merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
E2 Estimated level of Effort (1 is easiest, 4 is hardest) kubecost Relevant to Kubecost's downstream project needs-follow-up opencost OpenCost issues vs. external/downstream P1 Estimated Priority (P0 is highest, P4 is lowest)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants