Org maintainers update #1703
Org maintainers update #1703
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Toddy Mladenov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Toddy Mladenov <[email protected]>
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # Owners (in alphabetical order) | |||
| # Note: This is only for the notaryproject/notary repo and includes the Org level maintainers | |||
| * @hukeping @jonnystoten @niazfk @priteshbandi @shizhMSFT @toddysm @vaninrao10 @yizha1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For inactive repos without activities neither active repo maintainers in recent 1~2 years, should we prioritize the archival process instead? There is an issue notaryproject/.github#70 already proposed archive the notary repo.
This will relax unnecessary workloads to org maintainers and avoid confusing new users going forward. We add new maintainers to those repos indicate that new maintainers are responsible for its continuous maintenance for users. FYI the archival process below from the archival process doc:
The repository-level maintainers should be noticed about this archiviation issue. Once the proposal issue has a supermajority (two-thirds) of approval from Notary Project governance maintainers and there is no response from the repository-level maintainers after 30 days notice, the repository can be archived.”
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I would suggest merging this PR to refresh the latest org maintainers, and tracking the archiving issue at notaryproject/.github#70
Addresses notaryproject/.github#66, notaryproject/.github#67, notaryproject/.github#68, and notaryproject/.github#69