New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: pickChildren breaks when components are wrapped in HOC #2815
base: canary
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
updated react types, fixed alphabetical sorting in package.json
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@sapkra is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextUI Inc Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe recent updates primarily focus on refining dependencies and enhancing functionality. Key changes include the removal and updates of several packages in Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (2)
Additional comments not posted (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
if ( | ||
targetChild.displayName && | ||
typeof item.type === "object" && | ||
(item.type as ComponentType).displayName === targetChild.displayName | ||
) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refine the component type checking logic.
- if (
- targetChild.displayName &&
- typeof item.type === "object" &&
- (item.type as ComponentType).displayName === targetChild.displayName
- ) {
+ if (targetChild.displayName && item.type?.displayName === targetChild.displayName) {
This change simplifies the condition by using optional chaining and removes the redundant type check, making the code cleaner and potentially more performant.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
if ( | |
targetChild.displayName && | |
typeof item.type === "object" && | |
(item.type as ComponentType).displayName === targetChild.displayName | |
) { | |
if (targetChild.displayName && item.type?.displayName === targetChild.displayName) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you please share a failing example for us to test?
📝 Description
In my project I'm wrapping every component with an HOC, which leads to the problem that pickChildren won't detect the right component type. This change will use the displayName instead which can be passed down by the HOC.
⛳️ Current behavior (updates)
🚀 New behavior
💣 Is this a breaking change (Yes/No):
No, I don't think so. Already tested a few cases.
Summary by CodeRabbit