noble-ciphers

Auditable & minimal JS implementation of Salsa20, ChaCha and AES.

🔒 Auditable
🔻 Tree-shaking-friendly: use only what's necessary, other code won't be included
🏎 Ultra-fast, hand-optimized for caveats of JS engines
🔍 Unique tests ensure correctness: property-based, cross-library and Wycheproof vectors
💼 AES: ECB, CBC, CTR, GCM, SIV (nonce misuse-resistant)
💃 Salsa20, ChaCha, XSalsa20, XChaCha, Poly1305, ChaCha8, ChaCha12
🥈 Two AES implementations: choose between friendly webcrypto wrapper and pure JS one
🪶 21KB for everything, 10KB for ChaCha build

For discussions, questions and support, visit GitHub Discussions section of the repository.

This library belongs to noble cryptography

noble cryptography — high-security, easily auditable set of contained cryptographic libraries and tools.

Zero or minimal dependencies
Highly readable TypeScript / JS code
PGP-signed releases and transparent NPM builds
All libraries: ciphers, curves, hashes
Check out homepage for reading resources, documentation and apps built with noble

Usage

npm install @noble/ciphers

We support all major platforms and runtimes. For Deno, ensure to use npm specifier. For React Native, you may need a polyfill for getRandomValues. A standalone file noble-ciphers.js is also available.

// import * from '@noble/ciphers'; // Error: use sub-imports, to ensure small app size
import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
// import { xchacha20poly1305 } from 'npm:@noble/[email protected]/chacha'; // Deno

Examples
Implementations
Guidance
Security
Speed
Upgrading
Contributing & testing
Resources

Examples

Encrypt with XChaCha20-Poly1305

import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(24);
const chacha = xchacha20poly1305(key, nonce);
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = chacha.encrypt(data);
const data_ = chacha.decrypt(ciphertext); // utils.bytesToUtf8(data_) === data

Encrypt with AES-256-GCM

import { gcm } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(24);
const aes = gcm(key, nonce);
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = aes.encrypt(data);
const data_ = aes.decrypt(ciphertext); // utils.bytesToUtf8(data_) === data

Use existing key instead of a new one

const key = new Uint8Array([
  169,  88, 160, 139, 168,  29, 147, 196,
   14,  88, 237,  76, 243, 177, 109, 140,
  195, 140,  80,  10, 216, 134, 215,  71,
  191,  48,  20, 104, 189,  37,  38,  55
]);
const nonce = new Uint8Array([
  180,  90,  27, 63, 160, 191, 150,
   33,  67, 212, 86,  71, 144,   6,
  200, 102, 218, 32,  23, 147,   8,
   41, 147,  11
]);
// or, hex:
import { hexToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
const key2 = hexToBytes('4b7f89bac90a1086fef73f5da2cbe93b2fae9dfbf7678ae1f3e75fd118ddf999');
const nonce2 = hexToBytes('9610467513de0bbd7c4cc2c3c64069f1802086fbd3232b13');

Encrypt without nonce

import { xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto'
import { hexToBytes, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
const key = hexToBytes('fa686bfdffd3758f6377abbc23bf3d9bdc1a0dda4a6e7f8dbdd579fa1ff6d7e1');
const chacha = managedNonce(xchacha20poly1305)(key); // manages nonces for you
const data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
const ciphertext = chacha.encrypt(data);
const data_ = chacha.decrypt(ciphertext);

Use same array for input and output

import { chacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';

const key = randomBytes(32);
const nonce = randomBytes(12);
const buf = new Uint8Array(12 + 16);
const _data = utf8ToBytes('hello, noble');
buf.set(_data, 0); // first 12 bytes
const _12b = buf.subarray(0, 12);

const chacha = chacha20poly1305(key, nonce);
chacha.encrypt(_12b, buf);
chacha.decrypt(buf, _12b); // _12b now same as _data

All imports

import { gcm, siv } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';

// Unauthenticated encryption: make sure to use HMAC or similar
import { ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { salsa20, xsalsa20 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20, xchacha20, chacha8, chacha12 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';

// Utilities
import { bytesToHex, hexToBytes, bytesToUtf8, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { managedNonce, randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';

Implementations

Salsa

import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { secretbox } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa'; // == xsalsa20poly1305
import { salsa20, xsalsa20 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';

Salsa20 stream cipher was released in 2005. Salsa's goal was to implement AES replacement that does not rely on S-Boxes, which are hard to implement in a constant-time manner. Salsa20 is usually faster than AES, a big deal on slow, budget mobile phones.

XSalsa20, extended-nonce variant was released in 2008. It switched nonces from 96-bit to 192-bit, and became safe to be picked at random.

Nacl / Libsodium popularized term "secretbox", a simple black-box authenticated encryption. Secretbox is just xsalsa20-poly1305. We provide the alias and corresponding seal / open methods.

Check out PDF and wiki.

ChaCha

import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';
import { chacha20, xchacha20, chacha8, chacha12 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';

ChaCha20 stream cipher was released in 2008. ChaCha aims to increase the diffusion per round, but had slightly less cryptanalysis. It was standardized in RFC 8439 and is now used in TLS 1.3.

XChaCha20 extended-nonce variant is also provided. Similar to XSalsa, it's safe to use with randomly-generated nonces.

Check out PDF and wiki.

AES

import { gcm, siv, ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
const plaintext = new Uint8Array(32).fill(16);
const key = randomBytes(32); // 24 for AES-192, 16 for AES-128
for (let cipher of [gcm, siv]) {
  const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(12));
  const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
  const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ctr, cbc]) {
  const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(16));
  const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
  const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ecb]) {
  const stream = cipher(key);
  const ciphertext_ = stream.encrypt(plaintext);
  const plaintext_ = stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}

AES is a variant of Rijndael block cipher, standardized by NIST in 2001. We provide the fastest available pure JS implementation.

We support AES-128, AES-192 and AES-256: the mode is selected dynamically, based on key length (16, 24, 32).

AES-GCM-SIV nonce-misuse-resistant mode is also provided. It's recommended to use it, to prevent catastrophic consequences of nonce reuse. Our implementation of SIV has the same speed as GCM: there is no performance hit.

Check out AES internals and block modes.

Webcrypto AES

import { gcm, ctr, cbc, randomBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
const plaintext = new Uint8Array(32).fill(16);
const key = randomBytes(32);
for (const cipher of [gcm]) {
  const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(12));
  const ciphertext_ = await stream.encrypt(plaintext);
  const plaintext_ = await stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}
for (const cipher of [ctr, cbc]) {
  const stream = cipher(key, randomBytes(16));
  const ciphertext_ = await stream.encrypt(plaintext);
  const plaintext_ = await stream.decrypt(ciphertext_);
}

We also have a separate wrapper over WebCrypto built-in.

It's the same as using crypto.subtle, but with massively simplified API.

Unlike pure js version, it's asynchronous.

Poly1305, GHash, Polyval

import { poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/_poly1305';
import { ghash, polyval } from '@noble/ciphers/_polyval';

We expose polynomial-evaluation MACs: Poly1305, AES-GCM's GHash and AES-SIV's Polyval.

Poly1305 (PDF, wiki) is a fast and parallel secret-key message-authentication code suitable for a wide variety of applications. It was standardized in RFC 8439 and is now used in TLS 1.3.

Polynomial MACs are not perfect for every situation: they lack Random Key Robustness: the MAC can be forged, and can't be used in PAKE schemes. See invisible salamanders attack. To combat invisible salamanders, hash(key) can be included in ciphertext, however, this would violate ciphertext indistinguishability: an attacker would know which key was used - so HKDF(key, i) could be used instead.

FF1

Format-preserving encryption algorithm (FPE-FF1) specified in NIST Special Publication 800-38G. See more info.

Managed nonces

import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
import { gcm, siv, ctr, cbc, ecb } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { xsalsa20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/salsa';
import { chacha20poly1305, xchacha20poly1305 } from '@noble/ciphers/chacha';

const wgcm = managedNonce(gcm);
const wsiv = managedNonce(siv);
const wcbc = managedNonce(cbc);
const wctr = managedNonce(ctr);
const wsalsapoly = managedNonce(xsalsa20poly1305);
const wchacha = managedNonce(chacha20poly1305);
const wxchacha = managedNonce(xchacha20poly1305);

// Now:
const encrypted = wgcm(key).encrypt(data); // no nonces

We provide API that manages nonce internally instead of exposing them to library's user.

For encrypt, a nonceBytes-length buffer is fetched from CSPRNG and prenended to encrypted ciphertext.

For decrypt, first nonceBytes of ciphertext are treated as nonce.

Guidance

Which cipher should I pick?

XChaCha20-Poly1305 is the safest bet these days. AES-GCM-SIV is the second safest. AES-GCM is the third.

How to encrypt properly

Use unpredictable key with enough entropy
- Random key must be using cryptographically secure random number generator (CSPRNG), not Math.random etc.
- Non-random key generated from KDF is fine
- Re-using key is fine, but be aware of rules for cryptographic key wear-out and encryption limits
Use new nonce every time and don't repeat it
- chacha and salsa20 are fine for sequential counters that never repeat: 01, 02...
- xchacha and xsalsa20 should be used for random nonces instead
Prefer authenticated encryption (AEAD)
- HMAC+ChaCha / HMAC+AES / chacha20poly1305 / aes-gcm is good
- chacha20 without poly1305 or hmac / aes-ctr / aes-cbc is bad
- Flipping bits or ciphertext substitution won't be detected in unauthenticated ciphers
Don't re-use keys between different protocols
- For example, using secp256k1 key in AES is bad
- Use hkdf or, at least, a hash function to create sub-key instead

Nonces

Most ciphers need a key and a nonce (aka initialization vector / IV) to encrypt a data:

ciphertext = encrypt(plaintext, key, nonce)

Repeating (key, nonce) pair with different plaintexts would allow an attacker to decrypt it:

ciphertext_a = encrypt(plaintext_a, key, nonce)
ciphertext_b = encrypt(plaintext_b, key, nonce)
stream_diff = xor(ciphertext_a, ciphertext_b)   # Break encryption

So, you can't repeat nonces. One way of doing so is using counters:

for i in 0..:
    ciphertext[i] = encrypt(plaintexts[i], key, i)

Another is generating random nonce every time:

for i in 0..:
    rand_nonces[i] = random()
    ciphertext[i] = encrypt(plaintexts[i], key, rand_nonces[i])

Counters are OK, but it's not always possible to store current counter value: e.g. in decentralized, unsyncable systems.

Randomness is OK, but there's a catch: ChaCha20 and AES-GCM use 96-bit / 12-byte nonces, which implies higher chance of collision. In the example above, random() can collide and produce repeating nonce.

To safely use random nonces, utilize XSalsa20 or XChaCha: they increased nonce length to 192-bit, minimizing a chance of collision. AES-SIV is also fine. In situations where you can't use eXtended-nonce algorithms, key rotation is advised. hkdf would work great for this case.

Encryption limits

A "protected message" would mean a probability of 2**-50 that a passive attacker successfully distinguishes the ciphertext outputs of the AEAD scheme from the outputs of a random function. See draft-irtf-cfrg-aead-limits for details.

Max message size:
- AES-GCM: ~68GB, 2**36-256
- Salsa, ChaCha, XSalsa, XChaCha: ~256GB, 2**38-64
Max amount of protected messages, under same key:
- AES-GCM: 2**32.5
- Salsa, ChaCha: 2**46, but only integrity is affected, not confidentiality
- XSalsa, XChaCha: 2**72
Max amount of protected messages, across all keys:
- AES-GCM: 2**69/B where B is max blocks encrypted by a key. Meaning 2**59 for 1KB, 2**49 for 1MB, 2**39 for 1GB
- Salsa, ChaCha, XSalsa, XChaCha: 2**100

AES internals and block modes

cipher = encrypt(block, key). Data is split into 128-bit blocks. Encrypted in 10/12/14 rounds (128/192/256bit). Every round does:

S-box, table substitution
Shift rows, cyclic shift left of all rows of data array
Mix columns, multiplying every column by fixed polynomial
Add round key, round_key xor i-th column of array

For non-deterministic (not ECB) schemes, initialization vector (IV) is mixed to block/key; and each new round either depends on previous block's key, or on some counter.

ECB — simple deterministic replacement. Dangerous: always map x to y. See AES Penguin
CBC — key is previous round’s block. Hard to use: need proper padding, also needs MAC
CTR — counter, allows to create streaming cipher. Requires good IV. Parallelizable. OK, but no MAC
GCM — modern CTR, parallel, with MAC
SIV — synthetic initialization vector, nonce-misuse-resistant. Guarantees that, when a nonce is repeated, the only security loss is that identical plaintexts will produce identical ciphertexts.
XTS — used in hard drives. Similar to ECB (deterministic), but has [i][j] tweak arguments corresponding to sector i and 16-byte block (part of sector) j. Not authenticated!

GCM / SIV are not ideal:

Conservative key wear-out is 2**32 (4B) msgs
MAC can be forged: see Poly1305 section above. Same for SIV

Security

The library has not been independently audited yet.

It is tested against property-based, cross-library and Wycheproof vectors, and has fuzzing by Guido Vranken's cryptofuzz.

If you see anything unusual: investigate and report.

Constant-timeness

JIT-compiler and Garbage Collector make "constant time" extremely hard to achieve timing attack resistance in a scripting language. Which means any other JS library can't have constant-timeness. Even statically typed Rust, a language without GC, makes it harder to achieve constant-time for some cases. If your goal is absolute security, don't use any JS lib — including bindings to native ones. Use low-level libraries & languages. Nonetheless we're targetting algorithmic constant time.

Supply chain security

Commits are signed with PGP keys, to prevent forgery. Make sure to verify commit signatures.
Releases are transparent and built on GitHub CI. Make sure to verify provenance logs
Rare releasing is followed to ensure less re-audit need for end-users
Dependencies are minimized and locked-down:
- If your app has 500 dependencies, any dep could get hacked and you'll be downloading malware with every install. We make sure to use as few dependencies as possible
- We prevent automatic dependency updates by locking-down version ranges. Every update is checked with npm-diff
Dev Dependencies are only used if you want to contribute to the repo. They are disabled for end-users:
- scure-base, micro-bmark and micro-should are developed by the same author and follow identical security practices
- prettier (linter), fast-check (property-based testing) and typescript are used for code quality, vector generation and ts compilation. The packages are big, which makes it hard to audit their source code thoroughly and fully

Randomness

We're deferring to built-in crypto.getRandomValues which is considered cryptographically secure (CSPRNG).

In the past, browsers had bugs that made it weak: it may happen again. Implementing a userspace CSPRNG to get resilient to the weakness is even worse: there is no reliable userspace source of quality entropy.

Speed

To summarize, noble is the fastest JS implementation of Salsa, ChaCha and AES.

You can gain additional speed-up and avoid memory allocations by passing output uint8array into encrypt / decrypt methods.

Benchmark results on Apple M2 with node v20:

encrypt (64B)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 485,672 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 466,200 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 312,500 ops/sec @ 3μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 151,057 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 124,984 ops/sec @ 8μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 146,477 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 145,518 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 126,119 ops/sec @ 7μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 43,207 ops/sec @ 23μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 39,363 ops/sec @ 25μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 23,773 ops/sec @ 42μs/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 24,134 ops/sec @ 41μs/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 23,520 ops/sec @ 42μs/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 8,420 ops/sec @ 118μs/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 8,126 ops/sec @ 123μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─xsalsa20poly1305 x 195 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─chacha20poly1305 x 199 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─xchacha20poly1305 x 198 ops/sec @ 5ms/op
├─aes-256-gcm x 76 ops/sec @ 13ms/op
└─aes-256-gcm-siv x 78 ops/sec @ 12ms/op

Unauthenticated encryption:

encrypt (64B)
├─salsa x 1,287,001 ops/sec @ 777ns/op
├─chacha x 1,555,209 ops/sec @ 643ns/op
├─xsalsa x 938,086 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
└─xchacha x 920,810 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─salsa x 353,107 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─chacha x 377,216 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
├─xsalsa x 331,674 ops/sec @ 3μs/op
└─xchacha x 336,247 ops/sec @ 2μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─salsa x 57,084 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
├─chacha x 59,520 ops/sec @ 16μs/op
├─xsalsa x 57,097 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
└─xchacha x 58,278 ops/sec @ 17μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─salsa x 479 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
├─chacha x 491 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
├─xsalsa x 483 ops/sec @ 2ms/op
└─xchacha x 492 ops/sec @ 2ms/op

AES
encrypt (64B)
├─ctr-256 x 689,179 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 639,795 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 668,449 ops/sec @ 1μs/op
encrypt (1KB)
├─ctr-256 x 93,668 ops/sec @ 10μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 94,428 ops/sec @ 10μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 151,699 ops/sec @ 6μs/op
encrypt (8KB)
├─ctr-256 x 13,342 ops/sec @ 74μs/op
├─cbc-256 x 13,664 ops/sec @ 73μs/op
└─ecb-256 x 22,426 ops/sec @ 44μs/op
encrypt (1MB)
├─ctr-256 x 106 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
├─cbc-256 x 109 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
└─ecb-256 x 179 ops/sec @ 5ms/op

Compare to other implementations:

xsalsa20poly1305 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─tweetnacl x 108 ops/sec @ 9ms/op
└─noble x 190 ops/sec @ 5ms/op

chacha20poly1305 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 1,360 ops/sec @ 735μs/op
├─stablelib x 117 ops/sec @ 8ms/op
└─noble x 193 ops/sec @ 5ms/op

chacha (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 2,035 ops/sec @ 491μs/op
├─stablelib x 206 ops/sec @ 4ms/op
└─noble x 474 ops/sec @ 2ms/op

ctr-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 3,530 ops/sec @ 283μs/op
├─stablelib x 70 ops/sec @ 14ms/op
├─aesjs x 31 ops/sec @ 32ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 4,589 ops/sec @ 217μs/op
└─noble x 107 ops/sec @ 9ms/op

cbc-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 993 ops/sec @ 1ms/op
├─stablelib x 63 ops/sec @ 15ms/op
├─aesjs x 29 ops/sec @ 34ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 1,087 ops/sec @ 919μs/op
└─noble x 110 ops/sec @ 9ms/op

gcm-256 (encrypt, 1MB)
├─node x 3,196 ops/sec @ 312μs/op
├─stablelib x 27 ops/sec @ 36ms/op
├─noble-webcrypto x 4,059 ops/sec @ 246μs/op
└─noble x 74 ops/sec @ 13ms/op

Upgrading

Upgrade from micro-aes-gcm package is simple:

// prepare
const key = Uint8Array.from([
  64, 196, 127, 247, 172, 2, 34, 159, 6, 241, 30,
  174, 183, 229, 41, 114, 253, 122, 119, 168, 177,
  243, 155, 236, 164, 159, 98, 72, 162, 243, 224, 195,
]);
const message = 'Hello world';

// previous
import * as aes from 'micro-aes-gcm';
const ciphertext = await aes.encrypt(key, aes.utils.utf8ToBytes(message));
const plaintext = await aes.decrypt(key, ciphertext);
console.log(aes.utils.bytesToUtf8(plaintext) === message);

// became =>

import { gcm } from '@noble/ciphers/aes';
import { bytesToUtf8, utf8ToBytes } from '@noble/ciphers/utils';
import { managedNonce } from '@noble/ciphers/webcrypto';
const aes = managedNonce(gcm)(key);
const ciphertext = aes.encrypt(utf8ToBytes(message));
const plaintext = aes.decrypt(key, ciphertext);
console.log(bytesToUtf8(plaintext) === message);

Contributing & testing

Clone the repository
npm install to install build dependencies like TypeScript
npm run build to compile TypeScript code
npm run test will execute all main tests

Resources

Check out paulmillr.com/noble for useful resources, articles, documentation and demos related to the library.

License

The MIT License (MIT)

See LICENSE file.

Name		Name	Last commit message	Last commit date
Latest commit History 128 Commits
.github		.github
.vscode		.vscode
benchmark		benchmark
build		build
esm		esm
src		src
test		test
.gitignore		.gitignore
.prettierrc.json		.prettierrc.json
LICENSE		LICENSE
README.md		README.md
SECURITY.md		SECURITY.md
package-lock.json		package-lock.json
package.json		package.json
tsconfig.esm.json		tsconfig.esm.json
tsconfig.json		tsconfig.json

License

mirceanis/noble-ciphers

Folders and files

Latest commit

History

Repository files navigation

noble-ciphers

This library belongs to noble cryptography

Usage

Examples

Encrypt with XChaCha20-Poly1305

Encrypt with AES-256-GCM

Use existing key instead of a new one

Encrypt without nonce

Use same array for input and output

All imports

Implementations

Salsa

ChaCha

AES

Webcrypto AES

Poly1305, GHash, Polyval

FF1

Managed nonces

Guidance

Which cipher should I pick?

How to encrypt properly

Nonces

Encryption limits

AES internals and block modes

Security

Constant-timeness

Supply chain security

Randomness

Speed

Upgrading

Contributing & testing

Resources

License

About

Resources

License

Security policy

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages 0

Languages

Packages