-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
microsoft ebpf-for-windows Q-a Discussions
Sort by:
Latest activity
🙏 Q&A Discussions
Ask the community for help
-
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 should eBPF for Windows allow multi-level nesting in map-in-map?
help wantedExtra attention is needed -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 BPF program should not delete outer map entries in map-in-map
bugSomething isn't working -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Should _ebpf_epoch_cpu_table[cpu_id].thread_table switch to a lock-free hash table?
optimizationAffects perf but not correctness or applicability -
You must be logged in to vote 🙏 Should _ebpf_epoch_cpu_table[cpu_id].free_list switch to using an InterlockedSList?
optimizationAffects perf but not correctness or applicability