Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
migrate device from TTN V2 to TTN V3 #22
migrate device from TTN V2 to TTN V3 #22
Changes from 3 commits
8f98697
9f4234e
de20a31
68b3e7b
bf9ecbd
acc99ef
c438660
85ded3f
83591b4
38f1f47
da813c9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check error status.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I have planned to check return value, unfortunately API saveField is of datatype
void
.In this case, I believe we can use API getField to read the value written in FRAM, and then compare to check for error.
Please advice on this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See previous.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can return an error. Check return value. As a consequence, rejoinNetwork can return an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, I have planned to check return value, unfortunately API saveField is of datatype
void
.In this case, I believe we can use API getField to read the value written in FRAM, and then compare to check for error.
@terrillmoore Please advice on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I filed a bug report but didn't make the change. No, don't use getField(); the saveField() API is going to change to be bool, and we'll deal with it then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
created a pull-request for changes with
McciCatena::cFram::saveField()
- Catena-Arduino-Platform PR-317