docs: update scripts to TypeScript #484
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Conflicts: # package.json # yarn.lock
|
Love dropping the unmaintained dependencies and simplified codegen. Also using the @maplibre/maplibre-gl-style-spec package versus manually fetching the json. So awesome! Thank you. |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 10.0.0-beta.1 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've migrated all
scriptsto TypeScript. Along the way, I've:react-docgenbranch fromrnmapboxasyncnode fs methodsnode-dirdependencygeneratetocodegenas a more common used script name (we generate not only docs but also styles implementation)@maplibre/maplibre-gl-style-specpackageOnly the
symbolStyleofAnnotationseems to drop with the new setup. TBH I don't really understand the usecase, why this object is exposed via the ref. Maybe it should be removed anyway?