fix regarding not using the correct plural number when checking if a plural form is translated #93
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is this a fix, improvement or something else?
This pull request addresses issue #92 by fixing a bug in the IsTranslatedN() and IsTranslatedNC() functions, which previously failed to utilize the do.pluralForm(n) method. This resulted in incorrect checks against the msgstr[N] instead of the appropriate plural form.
What does this change implement/fix?
This change rectifies the issue, enabling you to correctly verify the existence of a translation and subsequently retrieve it or display a placeholder as needed. Here's an example of how this can be used in Go:
I have ...