Glyma.su chen 2022.yml

[ellatownsend90]

Curated and ready for review

[ellatownsend90]

Ready and awaiting a review

[StevenCannon-USDA]

This one mostly looks good to me, but I would like to see the comments be made more precise and specific.
Rather than "the role of Ft homologs is not fully understood since so many go into flowering time", let's use these points from the abstract:

  - GmFT3b expression was induced by photoperiod and circadian rhythm and was more responsive to long-day (LD) conditions, but there were no significant differences in flowering time between the wild-type, the GmFT3b overexpressors, and the ft3b knockouts under natural long-day, short-day, or LD conditions.
  - GmFT3b acts redundantly in flowering time regulation and may be compensated by other FT homologs in soybean.

For the synopsis - again, I think this should be more precise and specific. Let's use:
phenotype_synopsis: A flowering time locus, orthologous to Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), but apparently redundant with other FT loci in soybean.

For the gene_model_full_id, this one from assembly one is OK ... glyma.Wm82.gnm1.ann1.Glyma19g28390 ... but somewhat preferable would be one of the newer annotations. The first choice (we need to document this) would be from assembly 4 (glyma.Wm82.gnm4.ann1; glyma.Wm82.gnm4.ann1.Glyma.19G108100), because those genes are in the current gene families. For example, the FT genes are in this family:
http://dev.lis.ncgr.org:50082/?family=Legume.fam3.00317

So, please change gene_model_full_id to glyma.Wm82.gnm4.ann1.Glyma.19G108100