-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
PHP 8.4 support added #23
PHP 8.4 support added #23
Conversation
manishranjan-adobe
commented
Oct 18, 2024
Q | A |
---|---|
Documentation | yes/no |
Bugfix | yes/no |
BC Break | yes/no |
New Feature | yes/no |
RFC | yes/no |
QA | yes/no |
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
c5f9db7
to
82d6eac
Compare
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
…deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @manishranjan-adobe - There are a couple of BC breaks here that need reverting
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Please fix CS issues first |
@gsteel I see, we are using an outdated version of laminas/laminas-coding-standard which ultimately relies on squizlabs/php_codesniffer again which is not supporting 8.0 onwards. I am not sure if it kept outdated for a reason. |
An upgrade to laminas-coding-standard 2.5 or 3.0 may be required, at which point the direct dev dependency on |
…desniffer Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
…deprecated, the explicit nullable type must be used instead Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@gsteel I have fixed the PHPCS issues. Also, the laminas/laminas-coding-standard and squizlabs/php_codesniffer were updated. You might need to fix the CI pipeline. The below check may not be working properly after the upgrade. |
You should can run:
to fix cs |
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@gsteel @samsonasik All checks passed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few more adjustments and we should be getting there!
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@gsteel PR looks good to me. Let us know, if we miss something or need to relook. cheers |
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@manishranjan-adobe Please address @samsonasik's review feedback and then this can get merged 👍 |
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@samsonasik Suggested changes addressed. Please have a look. Thanks |
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
@gsteel As suggested, the changes have been made. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Signed-off-by: manishranjan-adobe <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @manishranjan-adobe 😅