Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 fix: disallow files containing unwanted files when initializing a project #4510

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

afzal442
Copy link

Fixes: #4487

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @afzal442!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @afzal442. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@afzal442 afzal442 changed the title 🐛 fix: disallow files containing .go or .yaml ext files when initializing a project 🐛 fix: disallow files containing unwanted files when initializing a project Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @afzal442,

That is great!

Could we just:

a) Improve the text message for:
"Target directory is not empty and contains a disallowed file %q. Files with the following extensions [%s] are not allowed to avoid conflicts with the tooling."

b) For this to be merged, we need it to be in a single commit. To maintain a clean git history and follow the general policy of Kubernetes projects (one PR, one commit, one change), could you please squash the commits? This makes it easier to revert changes if needed.

Otherwise, everything looks great here! As soon as you address these, we can get this merged.

Thank you so much for your contribution 🥇 – it's really great work!

@afzal442 afzal442 force-pushed the fix-allowed-files-ext branch from c4ab8d5 to bb1b899 Compare January 21, 2025 09:52
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/ok-to-test
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afzal442, camilamacedo86

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 21, 2025
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86: Overrode contexts on behalf of camilamacedo86: pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

In response to this:

/override pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

Hi @afzal442

Can you please rebase your branch with master?
Also, see that the logic of it seems not accurate : https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-ci-logs/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_kubebuilder/4510/pull-kubebuilder-test/1881642141856305152

we need to fix it.

@afzal442 afzal442 force-pushed the fix-allowed-files-ext branch from bb1b899 to 4e37805 Compare January 21, 2025 13:37
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@afzal442 afzal442 force-pushed the fix-allowed-files-ext branch from 4e37805 to d2968d1 Compare January 21, 2025 16:50
@afzal442
Copy link
Author

/test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@afzal442: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0 d2968d1 link true /test pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/overwrite pull-kubebuilder-e2e-k8s-1-32-0

(The prow is broken)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support flake.nix and flake.lock as allowed files when initializing a project
4 participants