Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

operator kubensync (0.3.1) #4437

Merged

Conversation

eryalito
Copy link
Contributor

@eryalito eryalito commented Jun 1, 2024

Thanks submitting your Operator. Please check below list before you create your Pull Request.

New Submissions

Updates to existing Operators

  • Did you create a ci.yaml file according to the update instructions?
  • Is your new CSV pointing to the previous version with the replaces property if you chose replaces-mode via the updateGraph property in ci.yaml?
  • Is your new CSV referenced in the appropriate channel defined in the package.yaml or annotations.yaml ?
  • Have you tested an update to your Operator when deployed via OLM?
  • Is your submission signed?

Your submission should not

  • Modify more than one operator
  • Modify an Operator you don't own
  • Rename an operator - please remove and add with a different name instead
  • Modify any files outside the above mentioned folders
  • Contain more than one commit. Please squash your commits.

Operator Description must contain (in order)

  1. Description about the managed Application and where to find more information
  2. Features and capabilities of your Operator and how to use it
  3. Any manual steps about potential pre-requisites for using your Operator

Operator Metadata should contain

  • Human readable name and 1-liner description about your Operator
  • Valid category name1
  • One of the pre-defined capability levels2
  • Links to the maintainer, source code and documentation
  • Example templates for all Custom Resource Definitions intended to be used
  • A quadratic logo

Remember that you can preview your CSV here.

--

1 If you feel your Operator does not fit any of the pre-defined categories, file an issue against this repo and explain your need

2 For more information see here

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Dear @eryalito,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (kubensync/0.3.1) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.30.0 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value automation.kubensync.com/v1alpha1, Kind=ManagedResource: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (kubensync.v0.3.1) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Dear @eryalito,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (kubensync/0.3.1) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.30.0 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value automation.kubensync.com/v1alpha1, Kind=ManagedResource: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (kubensync.v0.3.1) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Dear @eryalito,
Some errors and/or warnings were found while doing the check of your operator (kubensync/0.3.1) against the entire suite of validators for Operator Framework with Operator-SDK version v1.30.0 and the command $ operator-sdk bundle validate <bundle-path> --select-optional suite=operatorframework.

Errors (:bug:) must be fixed while warnings (:warning:) are informative, and fixing them might improve the quality of your solution.

Type Message
⚠️ Value automation.kubensync.com/v1alpha1, Kind=ManagedResource: provided API should have an example annotation
⚠️ Value : (kubensync.v0.3.1) csv.Spec.minKubeVersion is not informed. It is recommended you provide this information. Otherwise, it would mean that your operator project can be distributed and installed in any cluster version available, which is not necessarily the case for all projects.

Signed-off-by: Eryalito <[email protected]>
@eryalito eryalito changed the title Update kubensync 0.3.1 operator kubensync (0.3.1) Jun 1, 2024
@eryalito eryalito marked this pull request as ready for review June 1, 2024 19:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from haripate and tomasbakk June 1, 2024 19:35
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Dockerfile or bundle.Dockerfile is added/changed. Note that for security reasons none of these files are going to be used when building bundle. Docker file will be generated and all label information is taken from annotations.yaml.

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

/merge possible

@framework-automation framework-automation merged commit bb803d8 into k8s-operatorhub:main Jun 1, 2024
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants