Visualize uninstrumented services in the dependency diagrams

[nidhey27]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Closes [Feature]: Visualize uninstrumented services in the dependency diagrams #3804
• Replaces Visualize uninstrumented services in the dependency diagrams #4853

Description of the changes

• Updated GetDependencies to identify and include client spans without corresponding server spans, ensuring a complete dependency graph.
• Implemented updateServiceDependencyLinks to streamline the update of service dependencies, reducing code duplication.
• Enabled the representation of uninstrumented services in the dependency graph by inferring names from client spans lacking server spans.

How was this change tested?

• Introduced TestInferredServiceDependency to specifically evaluate the functionality of inferred service dependencies in the scenario of uninstrumented services.
• Created a client span without a corresponding server span and asserted the correct formation of dependencies, ensuring the inclusion of inferred services in the dependency graph.
• Employed assertions to confirm the presence and accuracy of inferred service dependencies, ensuring they are adequately represented with the correct attributes and relationships.

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[nidhey27]

Ref PR: #4853

[kannan-ak]

+1, we are awaiting this feature.
Currently the deep dependency graph is not showing the relationship with the databases and other non-instrumented services, for the given service.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.76%. Comparing base (a72dfc3) to head (d031261).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5062      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.20%   93.76%   -1.44%     
==========================================
  Files         343      343              
  Lines       16813    16846      +33     
==========================================
- Hits        16006    15795     -211     
- Misses        608      869     +261     
+ Partials      199      182      -17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger	10.43% <0.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
cassandra-3.x	18.31% <0.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
cassandra-4.x	18.31% <0.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-5.x	20.81% <0.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-6.x	20.81% <0.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-7.x	20.87% <0.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x	21.10% <0.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
grpc	?
kafka	10.13% <0.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
opensearch-1.x	20.90% <0.00%> (-0.07%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x	20.93% <0.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests	91.74% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.