session: add new session package

[Jorropo]

This replaces #563 and #561.

TODO:

• Tests
• Wire bitswap to unwrap the session
• Revert 22fa8b1 and wire the gateway to use this new package.
• Changelog (@Jorropo will do later)
• ¿ tracing ?

Questions:

• Right now consumer is a simple comparable to ensure it doesn't panic the map, it might be interesting to enforce something like interface[S any]{ comparable; SessionBadge() S } because this would enforce at compile time that the session consumer is not mixing different session types together (which would not work).
• Should GetOrCreate return (S, error) instead of S, bool ?
  Passing errors can always be done efficiently through closures as create does not leak, the important part is to not save in the map failed sessions.
• Should it be ContextWithSession(context.Context, ...Option) ? We might want to add something like a request root in there.

[Jorropo]

We ultimately went that route because it satisfy both:

• Session producers don't need a pointer to some already shared object (like blockservice) to inject a session in their context.
• It permits session consumers which don't need to maintain more state than in the session object to only inject their session in the context instead maintaining their own uint64 → session structures for it. This allows such state contained sessions to be cleaned up by the GC automatically.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4c3a1f2) 65.54% compared to head (fa52546) 65.29%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #570      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.54%   65.29%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         206      203       -3     
  Lines       25587    25516      -71     
==========================================
- Hits        16770    16660     -110     
- Misses       7344     7372      +28     
- Partials     1473     1484      +11     

see 16 files with indirect coverage changes