-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
663/mk/standardize op client requests #971
Merged
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
440e588
chore(open-payments): standardize incoming payment requests
mkurapov d22c304
chore(open-payments): standardize outgoing payment requests
mkurapov c196901
chore(open-payments): update tests for ilp-stream-connection & paymen…
mkurapov 85aa9d5
chore(open-payments): add test mock functions
mkurapov a59b1e5
chore(open-payments): add remaining tests for request functions
mkurapov 8a235dd
chore(open-payments): address comments
mkurapov 581a5e4
chore(open-payments): use types suggestion
mkurapov b7035d2
Merge branch 'main' into 663/mk/standardize-op-client-requests
mkurapov 6490fff
chore(open-payments): remove extraneous tests
mkurapov d42bc5b
chore(open-payments): address object copy suggestion
mkurapov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we check that the spy is called?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's already testing this (albeit indirectly): if the
createResponseValidator
doesn't get the properpath
andmethod
when its called, the test will fail based on the expectation oftrue
on L57There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, the
true
! 👍There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not the easiest to see when first reading it, but that was the best solution I could come up with to test the correct validator was passed in